First report 24 Nov 2014•Latest report 24 Nov 2014
Recipient record
Reports, concerns and published responses
Private and voluntary organisations · Company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.
Reports
1
Naming this recipient
Published responses
100%
Found for named reports
Concerns addressed
3
Across all linked responses
Stated actions
5
Described in responses
Reports over time
Reports over time
Reports naming this recipient by issue year.
Evidence profile
Report topics
Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.
100%published responses found
5stated actions described
Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.
Concerns and recipient responses
Statements from Salter Labs linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.
Surrey
Concerns raised3
Failure to properly engage the humidifier screw cap, causing loss of oxygen flow to the nasal cannula
Absence of a visual or audible alarm indicating loss of oxygen flow to the nasal cannula
Failure of accompanying training and literature to explain the oxygen-flow implications of improper humidifier screw-cap engagement
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something this recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.3
Action
Ensure updated equipment-provider literature includes reference to the humidifier safety valve.
Stated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 24 November 2014.
Action
Add multilingual labeling instructing users to check that the lid is properly sealed and explaining that leaks can reduce oxygen delivery.
Stated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 24 November 2014.
Action
Complete a multidisciplinary technical review of the humidifier thread design and document its findings in the risk management file.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 November 2014.
Respondent positions A position is what this recipient says about the concern when it does not describe a specific action.4
Position
The equipment provider is responsible for updating training and literature about the implications of improperly engaging the humidifier cap.
Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
Position
The current humidifier thread design is appropriate and has reduced cross-threading risk as far as possible.
Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
Position
The humidifier’s existing safety valve and leak-test instructions provide warnings for blockages and leaks, including cross-threading-related leaks.
Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
Position
The concentrator manufacturer is responsible for addressing the absence of a visual or audible alarm for lost oxygen flow.
Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.