Sandman Signature Sheffield Quays Hotel

Private and voluntary organisations · Venue

Pin Request correction

First report 29 Mar 2016•Latest report 29 Mar 2016

Reports, concerns and published responses

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Sandman Signature Sheffield Quays Hotel linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Addressed to Hilton Sheffield, now represented here by Sandman Signature Sheffield Quays Hotel.

    South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Adam Ben Miles · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Adam Ben Miles attended a Christmas party at the Hilton Hotel in Sheffield on 12 December 2015 and drowned after falling into the canal basin. The concerns included smoking being permitted near the canal, the lack of effective barriers separating people from the canal, and the absence of means of escape for anyone who fell in.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Sandman Signature Sheffield Quays Hotel; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of means of escape from the canal for people who fall in

    Wider context from the report

    “[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) That smokers were allowed to smoke outside the hotel near the canal. (2) That there wasn't any rails or other effective barriers to segregate drinkers from the dangers of the canal (3) That the canal didn't have any means of escape for anyone who fell in. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Sandman Signature Sheffield Quays Hotel; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Allowing smokers to smoke outside the hotel near the canal

    Wider context from the report

    “[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) That smokers were allowed to smoke outside the hotel near the canal. (2) That there wasn't any rails or other effective barriers to segregate drinkers from the dangers of the canal (3) That the canal didn't have any means of escape for anyone who fell in. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Sandman Signature Sheffield Quays Hotel; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of rails or other effective barriers segregating drinkers from the canal

    Wider context from the report

    “[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) That smokers were allowed to smoke outside the hotel near the canal. (2) That there wasn't any rails or other effective barriers to segregate drinkers from the dangers of the canal (3) That the canal didn't have any means of escape for anyone who fell in. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026