Recipient

Shimano Inc.

Pin Request correction

First report 5 May 2014•Latest report 5 May 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Shimano Inc. linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Neil Andrew Blood · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Neil Andrew Blood died shortly after falling from his bicycle under a passing van and its rear wheel while cycling in St Helier, Jersey, on 31 July 2013. The report raised concerns about the oversight, control, legislation, risks and warnings associated with the supply of pedal cycle cleats and shoes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Shimano Inc.; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consider potential risks and dangers of pedal cycle cleats and shoes

    Wider context from the report

    “2. To Department of Transport (UK): What oversight, control or legislation governs the supply of pedal cycle cleats and shoes, and what consideration has been given to the potential risks and dangers involved and what warnings should be supplied at the time of purchase? ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Shimano Inc.; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of warnings supplied at the time of purchase of pedal cycle cleats and shoes

    Wider context from the report

    “2. To Department of Transport (UK): What oversight, control or legislation governs the supply of pedal cycle cleats and shoes, and what consideration has been given to the potential risks and dangers involved and what warnings should be supplied at the time of purchase? ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Shimano Inc.; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of oversight, control or legislation governing the supply of pedal cycle cleats and shoes

    Wider context from the report

    “2. To Department of Transport (UK): What oversight, control or legislation governs the supply of pedal cycle cleats and shoes, and what consideration has been given to the potential risks and dangers involved and what warnings should be supplied at the time of purchase? ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026