Recipient

SMA Medical Practice

Pin Request correction

First report 2 Jul 2021•Latest report 2 Jul 2021

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from SMA Medical Practice linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Samantha Singh · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Samantha Singh developed a suspected nut allergy, was assessed as having a mixed nut allergy, and was prescribed an EpiPen. On 25 July 2020, she became unwell at home and suffered a cardiac arrest attributable to anaphylactic shock; she could not be resuscitated. The concerns included the miscategorisation of her test results, prescription of only one EpiPen, and lack of referral to an allergy clinic or follow-up appointment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to SMA Medical Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to offer follow-up appointments for allergy-related issues

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Following the appointment on 27 November 2019 Miss Singh was not referred to allergy clinic or offered a follow-up appointment to address issues arising from her allergy diagnosis. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to SMA Medical Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prescribe at least two EpiPens

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) At a GP appointment on 27 November 2019, Miss Singh was prescribed a single EpiPen. NICE guidance at the time indicated that no fewer than two epi-pens should be prescribed to a patient. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to SMA Medical Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to refer allergy patients to an allergy clinic

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Following the appointment on 27 November 2019 Miss Singh was not referred to allergy clinic or offered a follow-up appointment to address issues arising from her allergy diagnosis. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to SMA Medical Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to accurately categorise RAST test results

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Results of Miss Singh’s RAST test were wrongly categorised by the surgery as normal. As such, no further action was indicated by the surgery. It was only Miss Singh’s perseverance that led to a follow-up appointment being arranged to discuss the results with her GP where the mistake was discovered ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026