Recipient

South London Legal Partnership

First report 16 May 2018•Latest report 16 May 2018

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Local government · Local authority service. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports: 1
Published responses: 0%
Concerns addressed: 0
Stated actions: 0

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found

0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from South London Legal Partnership linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

16 May2018
Inner West London
Concerns raised6
1. Narrow road width placing cyclists in a vulnerable position
2. Failure to repair dangerous road dip in LAVENDER HILL
3. Inadequate cycle lane provision leading up to the traffic lights
1. Yellow box preventing cyclists from legally stopping in the junction
2. Inadequate protection for cyclists approaching the junction
3. Lack of cycle lane provision in LAVENDER HILL immediately past the junction
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements
No action or position from this recipient is clearly linked to the concerns in this report.
AI-generated summary

Lucia CICCIOLI · Prevention of Future Deaths report

This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

Report summary

Lucia CICCIOLI was cycling westbound through the junction of Latchmere Road and Elspeth Road towards Lavender Hill when she lost her balance after travelling over a dip in the road and collided with a MAN lorry. She sustained fatal injuries and died at the scene. The principal concerns were inadequate cycle-lane provision and protection, the junction layout and yellow box, the narrow road, and a dangerous dip in the road requiring urgent repair.

Read the report on judiciary.uk
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to South London Legal Partnership; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Narrow road width placing cyclists in a vulnerable position
Wider context from the report
“5) The narrow aspect of LAVENDER HILL immediately past the said junction places cyclists a vulnerable position when they arrive in LAVENDER HILL from the said junction. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to South London Legal Partnership; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Failure to repair dangerous road dip in LAVENDER HILL
Wider context from the report
“6) The dip in the road in LAVENDER HILL (between position 4 and position 5 on the Reconstruction Plan) is dangerous and is in need of urgent repair. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to South London Legal Partnership; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Inadequate cycle lane provision leading up to the traffic lights
Wider context from the report
“1) There is an inadequate cycle lane leading up to the traffic lights leading up to the traffic lights at the junction of LATCHMERE ROAD and ELSPETH ROAD (the cycle lane is coloured pink on the Reconstruction Plan). ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to South London Legal Partnership; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Yellow box preventing cyclists from legally stopping in the junction
Wider context from the report
“3) There is a yellow box in the middle of the said junction (situated between position 3 and 4 on The Reconstruction Plan) which causes concerns to cyclists when they are either proceeding straight through or turning right from the junction as they are prevented from legally stopping in the said yellow box. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to South London Legal Partnership; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Inadequate protection for cyclists approaching the junction
Wider context from the report
“2) There is inadequate protection generally for cyclists riding towards the junction with LATCHMERE ROAD and ELSPETH ROAD particularly for those cyclists that wish to go straight over the said junction towards LAVENDER HILL or for those cyclists that wish to turn right at that junction into LATCHMERE ROAD. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to South London Legal Partnership; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Lack of cycle lane provision in LAVENDER HILL immediately past the junction
Wider context from the report
“4) There is no cycle lane provision in LAVENDER HILL immediately past the said junction. ”
Open source report

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026

Reports, concerns and published responses

Reports over time

Concerns raised6

Narrow road width placing cyclists in a vulnerable position

Failure to repair dangerous road dip in LAVENDER HILL

Inadequate cycle lane provision leading up to the traffic lights

Yellow box preventing cyclists from legally stopping in the junction

Inadequate protection for cyclists approaching the junction

Lack of cycle lane provision in LAVENDER HILL immediately past the junction