Recipient

St Luke's Primary Care Centre

Pin Request correction

First report 12 Apr 2018•Latest report 12 Apr 2018

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from St Luke's Primary Care Centre linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Northamptonshire

    AI-generated summary

    William John Callis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William John Callis, who was suffering from depression and had sought help from his GP surgery, died by hanging himself at his home on 28 March 2017. The inquest identified that there was no specific instruction on the correct procedure for a GP practice to follow when referring a patient to the Urgent Care and Assessment team.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to St Luke's Primary Care Centre; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of specific instructions for GP practices making referrals to the Urgent Care and Assessment team

    Wider context from the report

    “1) During the inquest it became clear that there was no specific instruction as to the correct procedure for a GP practice to adopt when making a referral to the Urgent Care and Assessment team. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026