Recipient

Staffordshire, Shropshire and Black Country Newborn and Maternity Network

First report 14 Feb 2020•Latest report 14 Feb 2020

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Health-system partnership. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Staffordshire, Shropshire and Black Country Newborn and Maternity Network linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Leicester City and South Leicestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Marley Hope Slack · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Marley Hope Slack was born prematurely as the smaller of twins and died on 20 February 2019 after being found unresponsive in her parents’ bed. The report raised concern that the Trust’s prominent co-sleeping advice did not state that premature or low-birth-weight babies should not be co-slept with, and the inquest heard that her sleeping environment presented more than a minimal risk of sudden infant death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Staffordshire, Shropshire and Black Country Newborn and Maternity Network; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Omission of advice not to co-sleep with premature or low birth weight babies from prominent co-sleeping guidance

    Wider context from the report

    “The Red Book for your Trust contains in its inside cover a colourful list of 'Do's' and 'Don'ts' regarding co-sleeping which is obviously meant to be eye catching and for quick reference. You have accredited the information to the Lullaby Trust. I am concerned as the 'Don't section on co-sleeping does not include that premature or low birth weight babies should not be co-slept with whereas the rest of the Lullaby Trust's advice about not co-sleeping if you smoke, drink or take drugs is quoted. I acknowledge that the advice is repeated in full in 'The Safe Sleep Assessment' section inside the booklet at page 15. However, if you are providing information that appears to be designed for immediate impact it should contain the appropriate correct information and advice. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026