Recipient

Stockport Homes Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 19 Mar 2024•Latest report 19 Mar 2024

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Housing · Registered provider of social housing. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Stockport Homes Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Ian Dixon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ian Dixon, who had confusion, was unsteady on his feet and had a history of falls, was found deceased at the bottom of the stairs in his home on 8 June 2023 after suffering an extensive skull fracture and acute right-sided subdural haematoma. A principal concern was that there was no policy or review process to confirm that urgent equipment requested through the council and Stockport Homes had been installed or to identify delays, and the handrail had not been fitted despite being recorded as complete.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stockport Homes Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to review completion and delays in urgent equipment installation and repairs

    Wider context from the report

    “The Inquest heard that there is no policy in place governing the interaction between Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council and Stockport Homes following a request for the installation of equipment. This means that there is no review undertaken to check whether urgent equipment has been installed, urgent repairs completed or if there are delays/issues with the works requested. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stockport Homes Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a policy governing interaction following equipment installation requests

    Wider context from the report

    “The Inquest heard that there is no policy in place governing the interaction between Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council and Stockport Homes following a request for the installation of equipment. This means that there is no review undertaken to check whether urgent equipment has been installed, urgent repairs completed or if there are delays/issues with the works requested. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026