Recipient

SunnysideIncludes reports addressed to a minister or senior office-holder acting for this organisation.

Pin Request correction

First report 21 Dec 2017•Latest report 21 Dec 2017

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Residential care home. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Sunnyside linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Addressed to: Registered Manager of Sunnyside Care Centre.

    Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Margaret Ellen Postill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Margaret Ellen Postill, a resident with dementia at Sunnyside Care Home, fell twice on 2 May 2017 and later developed seizures after a subdural hematoma was identified. She deteriorated over the following weeks, was moved to palliative care, and died on 31 May 2017. Concerns included the lack of evaluation and completed assessment sheets after her return to the care home, and poor-quality documentation at Tameside Hospital concerning the second visit and decision-making.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Sunnyside; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to evaluate patients after return

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There did not appear to have been any evaluation of Mrs Postill after her return on 2nd May 2017. In particular no evaluation/assessment sheets were completed.(Home) ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Sunnyside; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of detail in decision-making documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The document held by Tameside Hospital relating to the second visit was of poor quality .In particular there was a lack of detail around the decision making.(TGH) ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Sunnyside; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor-quality documentation of second visits

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The document held by Tameside Hospital relating to the second visit was of poor quality .In particular there was a lack of detail around the decision making.(TGH) ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Sunnyside; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete evaluation or assessment sheets

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There did not appear to have been any evaluation of Mrs Postill after her return on 2nd May 2017. In particular no evaluation/assessment sheets were completed.(Home) ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026