Recipient

TGF Management Services Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 25 Nov 2014•Latest report 25 Nov 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from TGF Management Services Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    RICHARD ANTHONY TURNER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Richard Anthony Turner was working as a slinger when a crane jib section fell onto him during a lifting manoeuvre on 10 January 2014. He was taken to hospital and underwent several procedures before dying on 4 February 2014. Concerns included possible complacency among employees, a lack of a standard procedure to remind employees about lifting plans and risks, and limited evidence of toolbox talks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to TGF Management Services Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of regular procedures and toolbox talks to remind employees of lifting plans, risks and health and safety issues

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) By working closely with the same person and dealing with the same type of work in the same place, employees can become complacent with regard to health and safety and the risks involved in their work (2) Lifting Plans were signed by employees dealing with conducting a lifting operation, planning and preparation, supervision requirements, and other safety procedures to be followed which were signed by Mr Turner on 29 November 2011. (3) There does not seen to be any standard procedure in place to remind employees of these Lifting Plans, risks involved, health and safety issues with regard to the work. (4) There was evidence of only one “Toolbox Talk” having taken place since the accident. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to TGF Management Services Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Risk of employee complacency arising from repetitive work with the same people and in the same place

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) By working closely with the same person and dealing with the same type of work in the same place, employees can become complacent with regard to health and safety and the risks involved in their work (2) Lifting Plans were signed by employees dealing with conducting a lifting operation, planning and preparation, supervision requirements, and other safety procedures to be followed which were signed by Mr Turner on 29 November 2011. (3) There does not seen to be any standard procedure in place to remind employees of these Lifting Plans, risks involved, health and safety issues with regard to the work. (4) There was evidence of only one “Toolbox Talk” having taken place since the accident. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026