Recipient

The FA Group

Pin Request correction

First report 8 Dec 2015•Latest report 8 Dec 2015

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from The FA Group linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Avon

    AI-generated summary

    Ben Clive HISCOX · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ben Clive HISCOX lost his footing while running close to the touchline during play and came into contact with the clubhouse. The report raised concerns that the distance between the touchline and clubhouse was less than Football Association guidelines and that no action appeared to have been taken by the referee on the day.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to The FA Group; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the referee to take action in respect of applicable F. A. guidelines

    Wider context from the report

    “the distance between the touchline and the clubhouse was less than the F. A. recommendation guidelines putting players at risk of death or injury. No action appears to have been taken on the day by the referee in respect of the above F. A. Guidelines ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to The FA Group; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate distance between the touchline and the clubhouse

    Wider context from the report

    “the distance between the touchline and the clubhouse was less than the F. A. recommendation guidelines putting players at risk of death or injury. No action appears to have been taken on the day by the referee in respect of the above F. A. Guidelines ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026