Recipient

The New Lodge Nursing Care

Pin Request correction

First report 28 Mar 2018•Latest report 1 Mar 2021

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Nursing home. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
2

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from The New Lodge Nursing Care linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Derby and Derbyshire

    AI-generated summary

    Shirley FROGGTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Shirley Froggtt died on 8 November 2018 after falling from a wheelchair at a nursing home, sustaining a fractured femur followed by bronchopneumonia. The report identified that her care plan required a lap-strap, but it was not applied because a buckle was missing, and raised concerns about the nursing home’s systems for ensuring compliance with care plans, policies and protocols.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to The New Lodge Nursing Care; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of robust systems ensuring compliance with care plans, policies and protocols

    Wider context from the report

    “On the evidence heard at inquest I was not satisfied that New Lodge Nursing Home had any robust systems in place to ensure compliance with care plans, policies and protocols. ”
    Open source report

  2. Derby and Derbyshire

    AI-generated summary

    Donald Martin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Donald Martin, a 96-year-old resident of Langdale Heights Nursing Home with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease receiving long-term oxygen treatment, was observed struggling to breathe on 14 January 2016 and was pronounced deceased shortly after the ambulance arrived. The court found non-causative deficiencies in the emergency response before the ambulance service arrived. Concerns included whether the nurse in charge understood why or when CPR should be carried out on a flat surface and her lack of knowledge about deflating patient mattresses during an emergency.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to The New Lodge Nursing Care; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to know how to deflate patient mattresses in an emergency

    Wider context from the report

    “Nurse Cecilia Banjoko was the nurse in charge on 14 January 2016. During the course of the inquest she gave evidence that she no longer works at Langdale Heights Nursing Home and is now a nurse at The New Lodge Nursing Home in Mickleover, Derby. She gave evidence that since Mr Martin's death she had attended and completed practical training in relation to basic life support and cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, she also gave evidence that (i) she did not know then and still did not know why the ambulance controller had asked her to move Mr Martin from his bed to the floor prior to the arrival of the ambulance crew and (ii) she did not know how to deflate a patient’s mattress at the time of Mr Martin's death and was still unaware of how to do so. I am concerned that Nurse Banjoko: (i) may not understand why or when it appropriate to carry out CPR on a flat service; (ii) does not know how to deflate patient mattresses in the event of an emergency. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to The New Lodge Nursing Care; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to understand why or when to carry out CPR on a flat surface

    Wider context from the report

    “Nurse Cecilia Banjoko was the nurse in charge on 14 January 2016. During the course of the inquest she gave evidence that she no longer works at Langdale Heights Nursing Home and is now a nurse at The New Lodge Nursing Home in Mickleover, Derby. She gave evidence that since Mr Martin's death she had attended and completed practical training in relation to basic life support and cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, she also gave evidence that (i) she did not know then and still did not know why the ambulance controller had asked her to move Mr Martin from his bed to the floor prior to the arrival of the ambulance crew and (ii) she did not know how to deflate a patient’s mattress at the time of Mr Martin's death and was still unaware of how to do so. I am concerned that Nurse Banjoko: (i) may not understand why or when it appropriate to carry out CPR on a flat service; (ii) does not know how to deflate patient mattresses in the event of an emergency. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026