Recipient

The Northern Medical CentreIncludes reports addressed to a minister or senior office-holder acting for this organisation.

Pin Request correction

First report 8 May 2014•Latest report 8 May 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from The Northern Medical Centre linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Addressed to: The Partners, Northern Medical Centre, 580 Holloway Road, London.

    Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Frank POPE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Frank Pope had ischaemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease and an abdominal aortic aneurysm, and was admitted to hospital several times in 2013 for ischaemic colitis. He died on 12 December 2013 after rapidly deteriorating from a further episode of ischaemic colitis; concerns were raised that patients who lack capacity to manage follow-up appointments may miss them when family members are not included in correspondence, with no clear backup process identified.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to The Northern Medical Centre; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a back-up process for patients who lack capacity to make decisions about attending follow-up consultations

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Mr Pope’s family had concerns, which I share, that where a patient does not have capacity to make decisions about attending follow-up consultations, appointments might be missed when family members are not copied into correspondence. It was accepted that patient confidentiality would normally preclude such direct family involvement but that there may be circumstances when it is in the patient’s best interests to use this approach, to ensure follow-up occurs. It was not clear from the evidence heard at the inquest what steps are taken when a patient is deemed not to have capacity to make this type of health decision. Concerns were raised that there is no ‘back-up’ process in place and that future deaths could occur as a consequence. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to The Northern Medical Centre; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to involve family members in follow-up correspondence where patients lack capacity to make decisions about attending follow-up consultations

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Mr Pope’s family had concerns, which I share, that where a patient does not have capacity to make decisions about attending follow-up consultations, appointments might be missed when family members are not copied into correspondence. It was accepted that patient confidentiality would normally preclude such direct family involvement but that there may be circumstances when it is in the patient’s best interests to use this approach, to ensure follow-up occurs. It was not clear from the evidence heard at the inquest what steps are taken when a patient is deemed not to have capacity to make this type of health decision. Concerns were raised that there is no ‘back-up’ process in place and that future deaths could occur as a consequence. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026