Recipient

TPP Group Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 17 Feb 2023•Latest report 17 Feb 2023

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from TPP Group Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Newcastle upon Tyne and North Tyneside

    AI-generated summary

    Rachelle Naomi Ross · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rachelle Naomi Ross, aged 34, had not undergone a smear test before being diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma in November 2020. Despite treatment, the cancer metastasised and she died at home on 20 April 2022. The report raised concerns that GP systems did not automatically flag patients who failed to attend smear tests, potentially requiring manual recording of warnings.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to TPP Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of automatic GP-record alerts for smear-test non-responders

    Wider context from the report

    “1. During the course of the inquest I heard evidence from ████████, GP Partner at the Collingwood Health Group who informed me that GP practice records do not include an alert from EMIS or System 1 IT systems to provide an automatic flag on a patient's GP medical records if they are classed as a non-responder for a smear test by the National Screening Service. 2. The alert system is only triggered after a patient attends a smear test. For a non-responder, they go back into the three or five year waiting list for a National Screening invitation for a smear test. 3. An automatic flag or alert when a patient fails to attend for a smear test as part of the National Screening Service, would mean that a GP surgery would not have to manually add a warning as an entry onto an individual’s GP records. It would standardise the approach across all GP surgeries and could increase patient safety. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026