Recipient

Trafford Adult Safeguarding Board

Pin Request correction

First report 22 Dec 2017•Latest report 22 Dec 2017

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Trafford Adult Safeguarding Board linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Russell Charles ROBB · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Russell Charles ROBB died at Manchester Royal Infirmary on 9 April 2016 after taking a fatal combination of prescribed and non-prescribed drugs with alcohol. The report identified inadequate monitoring and lack of regular medication reviews, no apparent guidelines to limit the quantity of drugs available, and limited information sharing between agencies involved in adult safeguarding.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Trafford Adult Safeguarding Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limited information sharing between adult safeguarding board members

    Wider context from the report

    “which ultimately led to his death. There was no evidence of regular reviews of his medication. There appeared to be no guidelines in place to reduce the quantity of drugs available to Mr Robb at any one time. (CCG; Secretary of State for Health) 2. There was limited evidence of information sharing between the members of the Trafford Adult Safeguarding Board. This meant that the Local Authority were unaware of volume of interaction between the Police and Mr Robb.(Adult Safeguarding Board).As a result only 1 strategic meeting took place over a 6 year period ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Trafford Adult Safeguarding Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of regular medication reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “which ultimately led to his death. There was no evidence of regular reviews of his medication. There appeared to be no guidelines in place to reduce the quantity of drugs available to Mr Robb at any one time. (CCG; Secretary of State for Health) 2. There was limited evidence of information sharing between the members of the Trafford Adult Safeguarding Board. This meant that the Local Authority were unaware of volume of interaction between the Police and Mr Robb.(Adult Safeguarding Board).As a result only 1 strategic meeting took place over a 6 year period ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Trafford Adult Safeguarding Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to hold strategic safeguarding meetings at an adequate frequency

    Wider context from the report

    “which ultimately led to his death. There was no evidence of regular reviews of his medication. There appeared to be no guidelines in place to reduce the quantity of drugs available to Mr Robb at any one time. (CCG; Secretary of State for Health) 2. There was limited evidence of information sharing between the members of the Trafford Adult Safeguarding Board. This meant that the Local Authority were unaware of volume of interaction between the Police and Mr Robb.(Adult Safeguarding Board).As a result only 1 strategic meeting took place over a 6 year period ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Trafford Adult Safeguarding Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of guidelines to reduce the quantity of drugs available at one time

    Wider context from the report

    “which ultimately led to his death. There was no evidence of regular reviews of his medication. There appeared to be no guidelines in place to reduce the quantity of drugs available to Mr Robb at any one time. (CCG; Secretary of State for Health) 2. There was limited evidence of information sharing between the members of the Trafford Adult Safeguarding Board. This meant that the Local Authority were unaware of volume of interaction between the Police and Mr Robb.(Adult Safeguarding Board).As a result only 1 strategic meeting took place over a 6 year period ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026