Recipient

Transport Focus

Pin Request correction

First report 28 Sep 2021•Latest report 28 Sep 2021

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Other public bodies · Transport consumer body. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
1stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Transport Focus linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. South London

    AI-generated summary

    Dane CHINNERY and 6 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 9 November 2016, a tram travelling between Lloyd Park Station and Sandilands station derailed and overturned after the driver became disorientated and failed to brake before a tight curve; seven passengers were killed. The substantive concerns included inadequate risk assessment and mitigation, a lack of a just culture discouraging reporting of health and safety concerns, and the risk of under-reporting incidents.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Transport Focus; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Risk of under-reporting of incidents

    Wider context from the report

    “The risk of under-reporting of incidents ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
100%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026