Recipient

Treanor Pujol Limited

First report 30 Apr 2018•Latest report 30 Apr 2018

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Treanor Pujol Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Matthew Luke Fulleylove · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Matthew Luke Fulleylove, aged 30, sustained a fatal head injury on 5 June 2014 when his head became trapped between two heavy industrial machines passing on adjacent rail tracks during the production of large concrete beams. Concerns were raised about the restricted working space, the small gap between the machines, continued machinery passes, and the incomplete implementation of recommended safety measures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Treanor Pujol Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient working space beside track 12 near metal support legs and operating heavy railed machines

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) A Witness at the Inquest expressed concern about the safety of operatives who have only a restricted space in which to work in the vicinity of metal support legs at the side of track 12 in the factory. As heavy railed machines with rotating industrial saws are operating in close proximity concerns were raised as to the risk of fatal injuries being sustained due to the limited space available. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Treanor Pujol Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Relaxation of the stringent system of work for machinery passing

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) A Witness told the Inquest that heavy industrial machines of the type involved in this fatality do still pass each other on tracks 11 and 12 despite criticisms voiced by an Expert Engineer in relation to the small gap between them coupled with the fact that some of the remedial safety measures advocated by the Expert Engineer have not been implemented. In fairness, it recognised that a Director of Treanor Pujol Limited did attempt to explain that the incidence of ‘machinery passes’ is now much reduced and some protective measures have been implemented, together with greater levels of suspension and training. Nonetheless, concern remains that any relaxation in the stringent system of work advocated by the Expert Engineer may give rise to a repetition of the circumstances which brought about the fatality on 05/06/2014. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Treanor Pujol Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prevent heavy industrial machines passing each other in a small gap on tracks 11 and 12

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) A Witness told the Inquest that heavy industrial machines of the type involved in this fatality do still pass each other on tracks 11 and 12 despite criticisms voiced by an Expert Engineer in relation to the small gap between them coupled with the fact that some of the remedial safety measures advocated by the Expert Engineer have not been implemented. In fairness, it recognised that a Director of Treanor Pujol Limited did attempt to explain that the incidence of ‘machinery passes’ is now much reduced and some protective measures have been implemented, together with greater levels of suspension and training. Nonetheless, concern remains that any relaxation in the stringent system of work advocated by the Expert Engineer may give rise to a repetition of the circumstances which brought about the fatality on 05/06/2014. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Treanor Pujol Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to implement advocated remedial safety measures for machinery passing

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) A Witness told the Inquest that heavy industrial machines of the type involved in this fatality do still pass each other on tracks 11 and 12 despite criticisms voiced by an Expert Engineer in relation to the small gap between them coupled with the fact that some of the remedial safety measures advocated by the Expert Engineer have not been implemented. In fairness, it recognised that a Director of Treanor Pujol Limited did attempt to explain that the incidence of ‘machinery passes’ is now much reduced and some protective measures have been implemented, together with greater levels of suspension and training. Nonetheless, concern remains that any relaxation in the stringent system of work advocated by the Expert Engineer may give rise to a repetition of the circumstances which brought about the fatality on 05/06/2014. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026