Recipient

Trinity Medical Centre, South Shields

First report 3 Jan 2014•Latest report 3 Jan 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Trinity Medical Centre, South Shields linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Gateshead and South Tyneside

    AI-generated summary

    Keith Fleming · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Keith Fleming underwent elective reversal of an ileostomy in January 2013 and was discharged home on 14 January. He developed an unrecognised internal infection, was admitted as an emergency on 6 February, and died on 10 February 2013 despite urgent treatment. The substantive concerns included the absence of recorded temperature and blood pressure readings, insufficient monitoring and communication between surgical and community services, and inadequate care planning and record keeping after discharge.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Trinity Medical Centre, South Shields; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate relevant postoperative risks and complications to community carers

    Wider context from the report

    “The General Practitioner and consequently the nursing staff were not aware of that the anastomosis of the bowel carried out during the original operation ( 2007) had dehised. Nor were they aware of an internal area of abscess adjacent to the repaired stoma site , only discovered on post mortem and together leading to a catastrophic infection within the deceased particularly and significantly in the area of his left buttock. The reality was the infection within the otherwise pelvic area had tracked through the pelvis into the area of the left buttock. It was the presence of the swelling of this area of the buttock which was to alert the deceased’ wife several days after his discharge home to the growing crisis and resulted in her summoning her husband’s GP Dr.████████. The Doctor immediately recognized the symptoms, arranged for the deceased’ emergency admission to the South Tyneside District Hospital. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Trinity Medical Centre, South Shields; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate systematic assessment of physical symptoms

    Wider context from the report

    “The care plan devised during this period of community nursing care did identify a need to record temperature and blood pressure readings. Unfortunately these readings were not carried out and accordingly were not recorded. Physical symptoms were noted but only on a generalized – impressionistic basis - tiredness, responsiveness to questions and discussion – level of activity and mobility – diet. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Trinity Medical Centre, South Shields; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to measure and record community patients’ vital signs

    Wider context from the report

    “The care plan devised during this period of community nursing care did identify a need to record temperature and blood pressure readings. Unfortunately these readings were not carried out and accordingly were not recorded. Physical symptoms were noted but only on a generalized – impressionistic basis - tiredness, responsiveness to questions and discussion – level of activity and mobility – diet. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Trinity Medical Centre, South Shields; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of surgical teams to maintain ongoing oversight after discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “Whilst it has to be acknowledged in early correspondence to his GP from Professor████████ the surgeon in charge of the patient at the Freeman Hospital the possibility of pelvic infection was mooted as a risk factor in the proposed reversal -- no plans specifically provided on discharge for this possible contingency or appears. On discharge the care of the deceased was to be managed within the Community and the deceased was to be seen by the surgical team as “a follow up” some time in the future. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Trinity Medical Centre, South Shields; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a discharge plan for possible pelvic infection

    Wider context from the report

    “Whilst it has to be acknowledged in early correspondence to his GP from Professor████████ the surgeon in charge of the patient at the Freeman Hospital the possibility of pelvic infection was mooted as a risk factor in the proposed reversal -- no plans specifically provided on discharge for this possible contingency or appears. On discharge the care of the deceased was to be managed within the Community and the deceased was to be seen by the surgical team as “a follow up” some time in the future. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026