Recipient

University of Exeter Students' Guild

First report 14 Dec 2015•Latest report 14 Dec 2015

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Other public bodies · Students' union. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from University of Exeter Students' Guild linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Exeter and Greater Devon

    AI-generated summary

    William Jeffrey MASKELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William Jeffrey MASKELL, who had Bipolar Disorder, was found collapsed in his university room after ingesting a fatal quantity of Venlafaxine and Lamotrigine. He was taken to hospital but was declared deceased. Concerns included the lack of a clear protocol for involving relevant agencies and the Police, delays in attending and forcing entry, and a risk of future deaths from untimely intervention.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to University of Exeter Students' Guild; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient capacity for timeous intervention for students in distress

    Wider context from the report

    “3. There is a real risk of future deaths of students in distress for lack of timeous intervention because of the current restraints. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to University of Exeter Students' Guild; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prioritise welfare over student privacy in urgent intervention decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The respect for the autonomy of the student in running his/her private life appeared to take precedence over a real concern for welfare, resulting in delays in attendance at the scene and a reluctance to take the decision to force entry. It appears that the Students Union’s opposition to any erosion of the students’ human rights (to privacy) was a factor. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to University of Exeter Students' Guild; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a clear protocol for agency and police involvement

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The decision to go to William’s room was hampered by the lack of a clear protocol for the involvement of the relevant agencies and the Police. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026