Recipient

University of Gloucestershire

Pin Request correction

First report 5 Nov 2021•Latest report 5 Nov 2021

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Other public bodies · University. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from University of Gloucestershire linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Katrina Makunova · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Katrina Makunova had experienced abuse, coercive and controlling behaviour, and threats before she was fatally pushed by her ex-boyfriend on 12 July 2018. The report identified concerns about knives and gang affiliation not being consistently recognised or recorded as risk factors, and about workload pressures affecting the capacity of police Child Safety Units to carry out safeguarding effectively and safely.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to University of Gloucestershire; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consistently record knife possession

    Wider context from the report

    “Concern 1: Whilst significant steps have been taken to recognize contextual abuse by all the organizations since the death, there remains a concern. Police officers knew of the perpetrator’s wearing of a knife. Possession of a knife was not recognized in risk assessments and not always recorded by police, nor social services. It was also unclear from police evidence when gang affiliation should be explored and when it would be recognized as a risk. Those around Katrina, knew of her past and present association with gang members; yet this too never seems to have been investigated and identified by police as a risk factor. Evidence was heard from her brother and another witness that her fear of what harm the might do led her not to make a full disclosure of his controlling behaviour to the police. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to University of Gloucestershire; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to recognise knife possession in risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “Concern 1: Whilst significant steps have been taken to recognize contextual abuse by all the organizations since the death, there remains a concern. Police officers knew of the perpetrator’s wearing of a knife. Possession of a knife was not recognized in risk assessments and not always recorded by police, nor social services. It was also unclear from police evidence when gang affiliation should be explored and when it would be recognized as a risk. Those around Katrina, knew of her past and present association with gang members; yet this too never seems to have been investigated and identified by police as a risk factor. Evidence was heard from her brother and another witness that her fear of what harm the might do led her not to make a full disclosure of his controlling behaviour to the police. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to University of Gloucestershire; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to investigate and identify gang affiliation as a risk factor

    Wider context from the report

    “Concern 1: Whilst significant steps have been taken to recognize contextual abuse by all the organizations since the death, there remains a concern. Police officers knew of the perpetrator’s wearing of a knife. Possession of a knife was not recognized in risk assessments and not always recorded by police, nor social services. It was also unclear from police evidence when gang affiliation should be explored and when it would be recognized as a risk. Those around Katrina, knew of her past and present association with gang members; yet this too never seems to have been investigated and identified by police as a risk factor. Evidence was heard from her brother and another witness that her fear of what harm the might do led her not to make a full disclosure of his controlling behaviour to the police. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to University of Gloucestershire; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient Child Safety Unit workforce capacity to fulfil safeguarding responsibilities safely

    Wider context from the report

    “Concern 2: The workload pressures in the Child Safety Units of the MPS were considerable and cited by officers who had been disciplined as reasons for some failures. However data presented to the court by the MPS did not reassure that the MPS would be able to establish a CSU workforce of sufficient capacity to enable officers to fulfil their safeguarding role effectively and safely. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026