Recipient

Via East Midlands Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 1 Jun 2026•Latest report 1 Jun 2026

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Via East Midlands Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Nottingham and Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Phillip Tetley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Phillip Tetley died on 1 December 2025 after being struck by vehicles while crossing the A620 Straight Mile in Ranby. The report raised concerns about the lack of provision to assist people crossing the road, the increased use of the overflow carpark, and incomplete warning signage that might leave drivers unaware of the risks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Via East Midlands Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide adequate warning signage for pedestrians crossing near the car park

    Wider context from the report

    “The court heard evidence that the possibility of a crossing is being considered by the council. The overflow carpark to the south of the A620 has been increased in size and there is an increase in the number of people crossing the road to get to the prison estate. Many of those crossing expressed concern about crossing the road safely. The court is concerned that if nothing is done to assist those crossing the road there is a risk of future deaths. The court also received initial evidence from VIA in the form of a written statement that warning signs had been installed on the approach to the carpark, but then heard evidence that only “SLOW” signage had been installed, and planned “PEDESTRIANS IN THE ROAD/CROSSING” signage had not. As a result, drivers may be unaware of the risks posed at the car park location. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Via East Midlands Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of assistance for pedestrians crossing the road

    Wider context from the report

    “The court heard evidence that the possibility of a crossing is being considered by the council. The overflow carpark to the south of the A620 has been increased in size and there is an increase in the number of people crossing the road to get to the prison estate. Many of those crossing expressed concern about crossing the road safely. The court is concerned that if nothing is done to assist those crossing the road there is a risk of future deaths. The court also received initial evidence from VIA in the form of a written statement that warning signs had been installed on the approach to the carpark, but then heard evidence that only “SLOW” signage had been installed, and planned “PEDESTRIANS IN THE ROAD/CROSSING” signage had not. As a result, drivers may be unaware of the risks posed at the car park location. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026