Recipient

Wakefield MDCIncludes reports addressed to a minister or senior office-holder acting for this organisation.

Pin Request correction

First report 13 Nov 2015•Latest report 13 Nov 2015

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Nursing-home operator. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Wakefield MDC linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Addressed to: Joanne Roney, Chief Executive, Wakefield MDC.

    West Yorkshire (East)

    AI-generated summary

    Irene Scholey · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Irene Scholey, an elderly and vulnerable 73-year-old woman, died from pneumonia and empyema after living permanently with two daughters in a household described as dysfunctional and inappropriate for her wellbeing. The report identified concerns that her wellbeing would have been safeguarded if relevant agencies had been able to access and share information about her home environment, and noted the potential benefit of extending the Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub to elderly and vulnerable adults.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Wakefield MDC; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unsafe and inappropriate household environment for an elderly and vulnerable adult

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The household was dysfunctional, was an inappropriate environment for Irene Scholey to be living in, and was a risk to her physical and emotional wellbeing. (4) A safeguarding alert was raised in respect of Mrs Scholey in April/May 2012. (5) Her wellbeing would have been safeguarded had all relevant agencies been able to access, and to share, information relating to the home environment in which Mrs Scholey was living. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Wakefield MDC; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of relevant agencies to access and share information about vulnerable adults’ home environments

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The household was dysfunctional, was an inappropriate environment for Irene Scholey to be living in, and was a risk to her physical and emotional wellbeing. (4) A safeguarding alert was raised in respect of Mrs Scholey in April/May 2012. (5) Her wellbeing would have been safeguarded had all relevant agencies been able to access, and to share, information relating to the home environment in which Mrs Scholey was living. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026