Recipient

Watford General Hospital

Pin Request correction

First report 12 Jan 2017•Latest report 26 Feb 2020

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
2

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Watford General Hospital linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Hertfordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Jack Postle · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jack Postle was delivered by emergency caesarean section on 29 September 2017 after two missed opportunities for earlier delivery, and died on 5 October 2017 following treatment in a specialist neonatal unit. The principal concerns were insufficient capacity at the maternity unit to provide safe care and guidance that limited the availability of caesarean section in some circumstances.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Watford General Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient capacity at the maternity unit

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) That there is insufficient capacity at the WGH maternity unit to provide a safe level of care to patients. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Watford General Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Guidance limiting the availability of caesarean section, including after failed induction

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) That the guidance provided to consultants, for outlining options to an expectant mother, seek to limit the availability of caesarean section, even following failed induction. Of the three options, LSCS is the only one to include the caveat ‘but not as first choice’. This caveat is included without reference to any other clinical considerations which might affect the appropriateness of the options. (Para. 10 Induction of labour including out-patient and use of intrapartum oxytocin, 1st September 2016, Version 3.1) ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Watford General Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to reference relevant clinical considerations when presenting birth options

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) That the guidance provided to consultants, for outlining options to an expectant mother, seek to limit the availability of caesarean section, even following failed induction. Of the three options, LSCS is the only one to include the caveat ‘but not as first choice’. This caveat is included without reference to any other clinical considerations which might affect the appropriateness of the options. (Para. 10 Induction of labour including out-patient and use of intrapartum oxytocin, 1st September 2016, Version 3.1) ”
    Open source report

  2. Bedfordshire and Luton

    AI-generated summary

    Jennifer Elisabeth Lestajo CLARK · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jennifer Elisabeth Lestajo CLARK was born after a birthing pool delivery, and the midwife did not recognise that she was unwell until she collapsed about 30 minutes after delivery. She was transferred to Luton & Dunstable Hospital, where she died. Concerns included inadequate neonatal facilities at Watford General Hospital and the associated risk to babies’ lives in the future.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Watford General Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of adequate neonatal facilities and bed capacity

    Wider context from the report

    “1. a Consultant Paediatrician from the Hospital, during the course of his evidence, explained that there were over 5,500 births at Watford General Hospital every year, and that the Neonatal Unit only had a limited number of beds and was inadequate for that number of births. Despite having submitted a detailed Proposal for Expansion of the Neonatal Unit, this had been rejected 2. Without adequate neonatal facilities at the Hospital there is a high risk of babies’ lives being at risk in the future ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026