Recipient

Westfield Residential Home Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire

Pin Request correction

First report 26 Jun 2026•Latest report 26 Jun 2026

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Westfield Residential Home Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    Susan Dale · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Susan Dale, a resident of Westfields Residential Home, fell while being assisted with her morning routine on 8 April 2026 and later deteriorated, was taken to hospital, and died on 18 April 2026. The principal concerns were inaccurate and inconsistent records about the fall, moving her despite a recorded possible head injury without prompt clinical assessment, and the absence of an effective handover to staff taking over her care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Westfield Residential Home Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inaccurate and inconsistent record keeping

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The record keeping in the home appears to be inaccurate and inconsistent ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Westfield Residential Home Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide handover information between care shifts

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The senior care worker who came on shift later that day said she did not receive any hand over from the staff going off shift. This is a concern as observations need to be carried out when someone has fallen and banged their head and a handover would detail such incidents and whether there are any concerns with residents. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Westfield Residential Home Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to follow the falls policy for suspected head, neck, back or hip injury

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The falls policy of the home states that there are number of scenarios to consider before lifting a resident for the floor and states that the resident should not be moved until clinical assistance arrive. One such situation is if head, neck, back or hip injury is suspected. The incident log on advanced care cloud states there was ahead injury yet Mrs Dale was moved and no clinician saw her until she worsened and ambulance was called. Inaccuracies in reporting can lead to missed opportunities to provide care and inaccurate time recording of incidents can lead to the accurate appraisal of the developing clinic picture being made more difficult which in turn would lead to a delay in medical assistance being sought. This could lead to resident safety being compromised and deaths occurring. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026