Recipient

Westwood Homecare (North West) Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 10 Jun 2015•Latest report 10 Jun 2015

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Westwood Homecare (North West) Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Walter Willows · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Walter Willows was at home on 3 October 2014 when he choked on a crumpet and asphyxiated. The concern was that his care and feeding plans were reviewed only every three months, although his diet should have been adjusted more frequently to reflect his swallowing ability.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Westwood Homecare (North West) Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Infrequent review of feeding regimes in care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of the inquest hearing I was told, inter alia, that the Care Plans for such clients were reviewed on a three monthly basis. This included their specific feeding regimes. In the case of Mr Willows it was apparent that this should have been looked at far more frequently so as to adjust his diet to suit his swallowing ability. I took the view that these plans (and especially that part relating to feeding) should be examined more frequently and it was within the power of yourselves to arrange for this to happen. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026