Recipient

Withybush General Hospital

Pin Request correction

First report 12 Sep 2014•Latest report 12 Sep 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Withybush General Hospital linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Page · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Page was admitted to hospital after a fall, underwent surgery, and later fell from his bed, fracturing his cervical spine; his condition deteriorated and he died on 2 May 2014. Concerns included the absence of a falls risk assessment and low bed, communication needs after handover, and the provision of sufficient nursing staff when greater staffing levels were required.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Withybush General Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of training in communication following patient handover

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There was a training need identified regarding communication following patient handover. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Withybush General Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to carry out risk assessments identifying falls risk

    Wider context from the report

    “2. No risk assessment was carried out on Mr Page identifying the risk of falls. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Withybush General Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient provision of nursing staff when patient circumstances require greater staffing levels

    Wider context from the report

    “4. A review of the provision of nursing staff was identified when patient circumstances require greater staffing levels. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Withybush General Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of low beds for patients at risk of falls

    Wider context from the report

    “3. There was no low bed available to Mr Page. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026