PFD report

Sheila Ann Nicholls · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 Jan 2025•Buckinghamshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
8

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised8

  1. Failure to provide and embed effective life-support training for emergency response
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate staff competence to provide first aidPart of recurring concern: Inadequate staff training for emergency response
  2. Failure to conduct adequate investigations of adverse incidents
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigations
  3. Failure to verify and record required review of internal policies
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Assess the competency of staff who will deliver emergency CPR training within one month.

    Stated by Chiltern Care ServicesStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 13 January 2025.
  2. Action

    Rewrite, tailor, implement and monitor the full suite of 85 internal policies through controlled review, staff circulation, acknowledgments, training and compliance checks.

    Stated by Chiltern Care ServicesStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 13 January 2025.
  3. Action

    Finalise the process document governing emergency CPR drills.

    Stated by Chiltern Care ServicesStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 13 January 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Emergency CPR drills have not started because trainer competency assessment is pending; drills are expected to begin within one month.

    Stated by Chiltern Care ServicesUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide and embed effective life-support training for emergency response

Wider context from the report

“2. At the time of Sheila’s death, of the several staff members that responded to her choking emergency, only one staff member (nurse GC) had currently valid training in life support, but still undertook CPR ineffectively without being corrected by other staff. Evidence was also given that no simulated emergency drills were ever performed, and some staff were never aware their training had expired. Whilst nurse GC still works for Grange Mandeville Nursing Home, it is unclear how that nurse will be supported in their ability to provide an adequate emergency response, bearing in mind their existing training appears to have been insufficient. The deficiency in training and embedding that training, both generally for all staff, and for that specific nurse, creates a risk of death to residents should future emergencies arise. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate staff competence to provide first aid; Inadequate staff training for emergency response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to conduct adequate investigations of adverse incidents

Wider context from the report

“3. Evidence was given of two internal investigations undertaken by Mandeville Grange management following Sheila’s death, both of which failed to adequately consider significant matters. The investigations were performed by staff untrained in investigating adverse incidents. The inability to adequately investigate such matters creates a risk of death to future residents given deficiencies in care may not be identified or remedied in a timely manner. At the time of the inquest, the nursing home’s expressed intention was to instruct an external person or organisation to investigate future unexpected or unnatural deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to verify and record required review of internal policies

Wider context from the report

“1. Mandeville Grange Nursing Home considered several existing policies required improvement, and so they were rewritten following Sheila’s death, some using template documents from a health and safety outsourcing website. However, some rewritten policies still included clauses that remained irrelevant to the nursing home (e.g. regarding ‘oral suction devices’), and several policies remained undated and unsigned, and it was therefore far from clear which policies had been ratified and were in force; with poor version control overall. It was not always clear when policies had been written or by whom; when and by whom they had been reviewed; and if and when they were circulated, and to which staff members. It was also unclear from the evidence of staff members, whether policies were properly embedded and/or understood, and/or had been read by all staff, as there were no checklists confirming staff had read and understood the policies. At the time of the inquest, staff training on new policies was said to be ongoing, and planned staff competency assessments had yet to be arranged. Deficient management of internal policies creates a risk of death to future residents where there is an inability to verify and record that all policies: (a) are relevant to Mandeville Grange in the first instance; (b) have been ratified and are in force; (c) have been reviewed as required; and (d) have been circulated to all relevant staff, with confirmation of those policies having been read and understood. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain emergency-response training through drills and expiry awareness

Wider context from the report

“2. At the time of Sheila’s death, of the several staff members that responded to her choking emergency, only one staff member (nurse GC) had currently valid training in life support, but still undertook CPR ineffectively without being corrected by other staff. Evidence was also given that no simulated emergency drills were ever performed, and some staff were never aware their training had expired. Whilst nurse GC still works for Grange Mandeville Nursing Home, it is unclear how that nurse will be supported in their ability to provide an adequate emergency response, bearing in mind their existing training appears to have been insufficient. The deficiency in training and embedding that training, both generally for all staff, and for that specific nurse, creates a risk of death to residents should future emergencies arise. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate staff competence to provide first aid; Inadequate staff training for emergency response; Unreliable emergency response arrangements in care homes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to verify staff circulation and understanding of internal policies

Wider context from the report

“1. Mandeville Grange Nursing Home considered several existing policies required improvement, and so they were rewritten following Sheila’s death, some using template documents from a health and safety outsourcing website. However, some rewritten policies still included clauses that remained irrelevant to the nursing home (e.g. regarding ‘oral suction devices’), and several policies remained undated and unsigned, and it was therefore far from clear which policies had been ratified and were in force; with poor version control overall. It was not always clear when policies had been written or by whom; when and by whom they had been reviewed; and if and when they were circulated, and to which staff members. It was also unclear from the evidence of staff members, whether policies were properly embedded and/or understood, and/or had been read by all staff, as there were no checklists confirming staff had read and understood the policies. At the time of the inquest, staff training on new policies was said to be ongoing, and planned staff competency assessments had yet to be arranged. Deficient management of internal policies creates a risk of death to future residents where there is an inability to verify and record that all policies: (a) are relevant to Mandeville Grange in the first instance; (b) have been ratified and are in force; (c) have been reviewed as required; and (d) have been circulated to all relevant staff, with confirmation of those policies having been read and understood. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to verify staff receipt and understanding of safety policies.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure internal policies are relevant to the nursing home

Wider context from the report

“1. Mandeville Grange Nursing Home considered several existing policies required improvement, and so they were rewritten following Sheila’s death, some using template documents from a health and safety outsourcing website. However, some rewritten policies still included clauses that remained irrelevant to the nursing home (e.g. regarding ‘oral suction devices’), and several policies remained undated and unsigned, and it was therefore far from clear which policies had been ratified and were in force; with poor version control overall. It was not always clear when policies had been written or by whom; when and by whom they had been reviewed; and if and when they were circulated, and to which staff members. It was also unclear from the evidence of staff members, whether policies were properly embedded and/or understood, and/or had been read by all staff, as there were no checklists confirming staff had read and understood the policies. At the time of the inquest, staff training on new policies was said to be ongoing, and planned staff competency assessments had yet to be arranged. Deficient management of internal policies creates a risk of death to future residents where there is an inability to verify and record that all policies: (a) are relevant to Mandeville Grange in the first instance; (b) have been ratified and are in force; (c) have been reviewed as required; and (d) have been circulated to all relevant staff, with confirmation of those policies having been read and understood. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete training and competency assessment on new policies

Wider context from the report

“1. Mandeville Grange Nursing Home considered several existing policies required improvement, and so they were rewritten following Sheila’s death, some using template documents from a health and safety outsourcing website. However, some rewritten policies still included clauses that remained irrelevant to the nursing home (e.g. regarding ‘oral suction devices’), and several policies remained undated and unsigned, and it was therefore far from clear which policies had been ratified and were in force; with poor version control overall. It was not always clear when policies had been written or by whom; when and by whom they had been reviewed; and if and when they were circulated, and to which staff members. It was also unclear from the evidence of staff members, whether policies were properly embedded and/or understood, and/or had been read by all staff, as there were no checklists confirming staff had read and understood the policies. At the time of the inquest, staff training on new policies was said to be ongoing, and planned staff competency assessments had yet to be arranged. Deficient management of internal policies creates a risk of death to future residents where there is an inability to verify and record that all policies: (a) are relevant to Mandeville Grange in the first instance; (b) have been ratified and are in force; (c) have been reviewed as required; and (d) have been circulated to all relevant staff, with confirmation of those policies having been read and understood. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to verify and control ratification and versions of internal policies

Wider context from the report

“1. Mandeville Grange Nursing Home considered several existing policies required improvement, and so they were rewritten following Sheila’s death, some using template documents from a health and safety outsourcing website. However, some rewritten policies still included clauses that remained irrelevant to the nursing home (e.g. regarding ‘oral suction devices’), and several policies remained undated and unsigned, and it was therefore far from clear which policies had been ratified and were in force; with poor version control overall. It was not always clear when policies had been written or by whom; when and by whom they had been reviewed; and if and when they were circulated, and to which staff members. It was also unclear from the evidence of staff members, whether policies were properly embedded and/or understood, and/or had been read by all staff, as there were no checklists confirming staff had read and understood the policies. At the time of the inquest, staff training on new policies was said to be ongoing, and planned staff competency assessments had yet to be arranged. Deficient management of internal policies creates a risk of death to future residents where there is an inability to verify and record that all policies: (a) are relevant to Mandeville Grange in the first instance; (b) have been ratified and are in force; (c) have been reviewed as required; and (d) have been circulated to all relevant staff, with confirmation of those policies having been read and understood. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess the competency of staff who will deliver emergency CPR training within one month.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have not carried out any emergency CPR drills to date as we have been trying to work through a process document to ensure that what we put in place is fit for purpose. The document is now finalised however the starting of drills is awaiting assessment of staff competency who will deliver the training. This will happen within 1 month.”

Source location

Response from Mandeville Grange Nursing Home
Page 3 · response
Published 13 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Rewrite, tailor, implement and monitor the full suite of 85 internal policies through controlled review, staff circulation, acknowledgments, training and compliance checks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Having considered this further, we took the decision to engage C4Q to re-write all of our policies to ensure they are (i) relevant (ii) specific and (iii) that we remain up to date with current legislation. ████████ (our new Nominated Individual) is managing this process.”

Source location

Response from Mandeville Grange Nursing Home
Page 1 · response
Published 13 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Finalise the process document governing emergency CPR drills.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have not carried out any emergency CPR drills to date as we have been trying to work through a process document to ensure that what we put in place is fit for purpose. The document is now finalised however the starting of drills is awaiting assessment of staff competency who will deliver the training. This will happen within 1 month.”

Source location

Response from Mandeville Grange Nursing Home
Page 3 · response
Published 13 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver emergency-response training through eLearning, recorded face-to-face sessions, expiry reminders, a maintained training matrix and weekly compliance review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Effective from 14 October 2024, we transitioned the majority of our training to an eLearning format provided by The Access Group (Access Learning for Care). This platform automatically generates a training matrix for Mandeville Grange and also records any face-to-face sessions, ensuring the matrix remains accurate and up to date.”

Source location

Response from Mandeville Grange Nursing Home
Page 2 · response
Published 13 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Obtain a PractiMan adult/child CPR training manikin for the home.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have ordered a PractiMan Advanced CPR Adult/Child Manikin, 2-in-1 Life-like CPR Training Manikin for Adult/Child CPR Training for the home.”

Source location

Response from Mandeville Grange Nursing Home
Page 3 · response
Published 13 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Instruct an external person or organisation to investigate each future death.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We remain committed to instructing an external person or organisation to investigate any future deaths.”

Source location

Response from Mandeville Grange Nursing Home
Page 3 · response
Published 13 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage four additional trainers to maintain consistency and capacity in face-to-face training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To maintain consistency in our face-to-face training, we have recently engaged four additional trainers.”

Source location

Response from Mandeville Grange Nursing Home
Page 3 · response
Published 13 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Emergency CPR drills have not started because trainer competency assessment is pending; drills are expected to begin within one month.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have not carried out any emergency CPR drills to date as we have been trying to work through a process document to ensure that what we put in place is fit for purpose. The document is now finalised however the starting of drills is awaiting assessment of staff competency who will deliver the training. This will happen within 1 month.”

Source location

Response from Mandeville Grange Nursing Home
Page 3 · response
Published 13 January 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026