PFD report

Russell William Sherwood · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Jun 2017•South Wales Central

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of equipment for closing highways
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable road closure arrangements for hazardous roads
  2. Failure to maintain road safety while flooding continues to pose a risk to life
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably manage flooding and standing-water risks on roadsPart of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signagePart of recurring concern: Unreliable road closure arrangements for hazardous roads
  3. Failure of Fire Service arrangements to enable road closure
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable road closure arrangements for hazardous roads
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Conduct a comprehensive review of operating procedures, including consideration of the coroner’s recommendations and flooding and inland water emergency response arrangements.

    Stated by South Wales Fire and Rescue ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 9 August 2017.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of equipment for closing highways

Wider context from the report

“(1) The evidence revealed that having rescued a motorist from flooding, at a time when the flooding continued to pose a risk to life, the Fire Service Unit departed the scene before the Highways authority arrived and without closing the road or leaving any warning signs. (2) The evidence further revealed that South Wales Fire and Rescue Service Units do not carry equipment to close highways and they only carry enough equipment to make a road safe when dealing with an incident. Furthermore, it was stated in evidence that the Fire Service rely on the Highways authority or the Police to carry out road closures and Fire Service protocols do not permit the closure of roads. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable road closure arrangements for hazardous roads.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain road safety while flooding continues to pose a risk to life

Wider context from the report

“(1) The evidence revealed that having rescued a motorist from flooding, at a time when the flooding continued to pose a risk to life, the Fire Service Unit departed the scene before the Highways authority arrived and without closing the road or leaving any warning signs. (2) The evidence further revealed that South Wales Fire and Rescue Service Units do not carry equipment to close highways and they only carry enough equipment to make a road safe when dealing with an incident. Furthermore, it was stated in evidence that the Fire Service rely on the Highways authority or the Police to carry out road closures and Fire Service protocols do not permit the closure of roads. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably manage flooding and standing-water risks on roads; Inadequate road warning signage; Unreliable road closure arrangements for hazardous roads.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of Fire Service arrangements to enable road closure

Wider context from the report

“(1) The evidence revealed that having rescued a motorist from flooding, at a time when the flooding continued to pose a risk to life, the Fire Service Unit departed the scene before the Highways authority arrived and without closing the road or leaving any warning signs. (2) The evidence further revealed that South Wales Fire and Rescue Service Units do not carry equipment to close highways and they only carry enough equipment to make a road safe when dealing with an incident. Furthermore, it was stated in evidence that the Fire Service rely on the Highways authority or the Police to carry out road closures and Fire Service protocols do not permit the closure of roads. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable road closure arrangements for hazardous roads.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a comprehensive review of operating procedures, including consideration of the coroner’s recommendations and flooding and inland water emergency response arrangements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are pleased to confirm that your recommendations for action ("your Recommendations"), as set out at paragraph 6 on page 2 of your Report, are currently being considered by the Service as part of its overarching response to the Fire and Rescue Services (Emergencies) (Wales) (Amendment) Order 2017 ("the Order"). For your information, the Order creates a new statutory duty for Fire and Rescue Authorities to make provision from 1 April 2017 for responding to flooding and inland water emergencies which present a risk of death, serious injury or serious illness to people.”

Source location

2017-0192-Response-by-South-Wales-Fire-and-Rescue-Services
Page 1 · response
Published 9 August 2017

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Report the outcome of the operating-procedure review to the Senior Management Team by 31 October 2017.

    Stated by South Wales Fire and Rescue ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 9 August 2017.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Report the outcome of the operating-procedure review to the Senior Management Team by 31 October 2017.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Service is in the process of conducting a comprehensive review of its operating procedures, both in response to the Order and as part of the Service’s regular assessments of all operational activity. You have our assurance that full and detailed consideration is being given to your Recommendations as part of this ongoing review. We anticipate that the outcome of the review will be reported by the Service’s Senior Management Team by 31 October 2017.”

Source location

2017-0192-Response-by-South-Wales-Fire-and-Rescue-Services
Page 1 · response
Published 9 August 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026