PFD report

JOHN ALFRED ROBERTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Apr 2023•Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to communicate medication dosage errors to patients and GPs
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of hospital discharge-summary processes to provide accurate, complete and timely information to GPsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of critical medication information to GPs
  2. Failure to administer the prescribed steroid dosage accurately
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe medication administration
  3. Failure of prednisolone guidance to reflect bowel perforation risk in diverticular disease
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete medication safety guidance for prescribers
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Assess BNF information and review literature on bowel perforation risk in patients with diverticular disease.

    Stated by BNF PublicationsStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 May 2023.
  2. Action

    Add diverticular disease and increased risk of diverticular perforation to the Cautions section of all corticosteroid monographs in the August online update.

    Stated by BNF PublicationsStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 3 May 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Existing medicines reconciliation policies were applied and detected the dosage error before harm occurred.

    Stated by Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to communicate medication dosage errors to patients and GPs

Wider context from the report

“(1) Royal Cornwall Hospital (RCHT) • The concern is the inadvertent reduction of steroid dosage and the arrangements made in relation to the administration of medication dosages and the policies regarding dosage errors, and the application of those policies. • The Court heard that the dosage of 100mg prednisolone was inadvertently reduced to 25mg from 7 to 13 June. The full dose of 100mg was given either side of that period, on 5 and 15 June 2021. No explanation was offered for this reduction other than it being an inadvertent mistake. • RCHT Consultants accepted that the dosage error was a serious mistake. Furthermore, this mistake was not drawn to the patient John’s attention or to the attention of the GP via the discharge summary, which made no reference to the dosage error. It was unclear whether treating physicians or discharging physicians were aware of the dosage error. (2) The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) • The concern is regarding the accuracy and rigour of the British National Formulary (BNF) guidance on Prednisolone, published by NICE, The National Institute for Clinical Excellence • BNF provides Key information on the selection, prescribing, dispensing and administration of medicines. The BNF aims to provide prescribers, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals with sound up-to-date information about the use of medicines. • Evidence was taken at Inquest from a consultant neurologist that recent literature suggests an association between steroids (such as prednisolone) and the risk of bowel perforation in those with diverticular disease. This is not reflected in the BNF guidance regarding prednisolone. • In relation to a number of sections in the Prednisolone guidance it was found as follows • The ‘Important safety information’ section does not refer to the risk of perforation from using corticosteroids for those with diverticular disease • The ‘Contra-indications For all corticosteroids (systemic)’ section does not refer to need for caution in using corticosteroids for those with diverticular disease, albeit it does refer to caution in using with patients with diabetes mellitus and diverticulitis • The ‘Side effects’ section makes no reference to bowel perforation as a risk, albeit it does make reference to peptic ulceration. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of hospital discharge-summary processes to provide accurate, complete and timely information to GPs; Unreliable communication of critical medication information to GPs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to administer the prescribed steroid dosage accurately

Wider context from the report

“(1) Royal Cornwall Hospital (RCHT) • The concern is the inadvertent reduction of steroid dosage and the arrangements made in relation to the administration of medication dosages and the policies regarding dosage errors, and the application of those policies. • The Court heard that the dosage of 100mg prednisolone was inadvertently reduced to 25mg from 7 to 13 June. The full dose of 100mg was given either side of that period, on 5 and 15 June 2021. No explanation was offered for this reduction other than it being an inadvertent mistake. • RCHT Consultants accepted that the dosage error was a serious mistake. Furthermore, this mistake was not drawn to the patient John’s attention or to the attention of the GP via the discharge summary, which made no reference to the dosage error. It was unclear whether treating physicians or discharging physicians were aware of the dosage error. (2) The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) • The concern is regarding the accuracy and rigour of the British National Formulary (BNF) guidance on Prednisolone, published by NICE, The National Institute for Clinical Excellence • BNF provides Key information on the selection, prescribing, dispensing and administration of medicines. The BNF aims to provide prescribers, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals with sound up-to-date information about the use of medicines. • Evidence was taken at Inquest from a consultant neurologist that recent literature suggests an association between steroids (such as prednisolone) and the risk of bowel perforation in those with diverticular disease. This is not reflected in the BNF guidance regarding prednisolone. • In relation to a number of sections in the Prednisolone guidance it was found as follows • The ‘Important safety information’ section does not refer to the risk of perforation from using corticosteroids for those with diverticular disease • The ‘Contra-indications For all corticosteroids (systemic)’ section does not refer to need for caution in using corticosteroids for those with diverticular disease, albeit it does refer to caution in using with patients with diabetes mellitus and diverticulitis • The ‘Side effects’ section makes no reference to bowel perforation as a risk, albeit it does make reference to peptic ulceration. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe medication administration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of prednisolone guidance to reflect bowel perforation risk in diverticular disease

Wider context from the report

“(1) Royal Cornwall Hospital (RCHT) • The concern is the inadvertent reduction of steroid dosage and the arrangements made in relation to the administration of medication dosages and the policies regarding dosage errors, and the application of those policies. • The Court heard that the dosage of 100mg prednisolone was inadvertently reduced to 25mg from 7 to 13 June. The full dose of 100mg was given either side of that period, on 5 and 15 June 2021. No explanation was offered for this reduction other than it being an inadvertent mistake. • RCHT Consultants accepted that the dosage error was a serious mistake. Furthermore, this mistake was not drawn to the patient John’s attention or to the attention of the GP via the discharge summary, which made no reference to the dosage error. It was unclear whether treating physicians or discharging physicians were aware of the dosage error. (2) The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) • The concern is regarding the accuracy and rigour of the British National Formulary (BNF) guidance on Prednisolone, published by NICE, The National Institute for Clinical Excellence • BNF provides Key information on the selection, prescribing, dispensing and administration of medicines. The BNF aims to provide prescribers, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals with sound up-to-date information about the use of medicines. • Evidence was taken at Inquest from a consultant neurologist that recent literature suggests an association between steroids (such as prednisolone) and the risk of bowel perforation in those with diverticular disease. This is not reflected in the BNF guidance regarding prednisolone. • In relation to a number of sections in the Prednisolone guidance it was found as follows • The ‘Important safety information’ section does not refer to the risk of perforation from using corticosteroids for those with diverticular disease • The ‘Contra-indications For all corticosteroids (systemic)’ section does not refer to need for caution in using corticosteroids for those with diverticular disease, albeit it does refer to caution in using with patients with diabetes mellitus and diverticulitis • The ‘Side effects’ section makes no reference to bowel perforation as a risk, albeit it does make reference to peptic ulceration. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete medication safety guidance for prescribers.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to apply policies regarding medication dosage errors

Wider context from the report

“(1) Royal Cornwall Hospital (RCHT) • The concern is the inadvertent reduction of steroid dosage and the arrangements made in relation to the administration of medication dosages and the policies regarding dosage errors, and the application of those policies. • The Court heard that the dosage of 100mg prednisolone was inadvertently reduced to 25mg from 7 to 13 June. The full dose of 100mg was given either side of that period, on 5 and 15 June 2021. No explanation was offered for this reduction other than it being an inadvertent mistake. • RCHT Consultants accepted that the dosage error was a serious mistake. Furthermore, this mistake was not drawn to the patient John’s attention or to the attention of the GP via the discharge summary, which made no reference to the dosage error. It was unclear whether treating physicians or discharging physicians were aware of the dosage error. (2) The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) • The concern is regarding the accuracy and rigour of the British National Formulary (BNF) guidance on Prednisolone, published by NICE, The National Institute for Clinical Excellence • BNF provides Key information on the selection, prescribing, dispensing and administration of medicines. The BNF aims to provide prescribers, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals with sound up-to-date information about the use of medicines. • Evidence was taken at Inquest from a consultant neurologist that recent literature suggests an association between steroids (such as prednisolone) and the risk of bowel perforation in those with diverticular disease. This is not reflected in the BNF guidance regarding prednisolone. • In relation to a number of sections in the Prednisolone guidance it was found as follows • The ‘Important safety information’ section does not refer to the risk of perforation from using corticosteroids for those with diverticular disease • The ‘Contra-indications For all corticosteroids (systemic)’ section does not refer to need for caution in using corticosteroids for those with diverticular disease, albeit it does refer to caution in using with patients with diabetes mellitus and diverticulitis • The ‘Side effects’ section makes no reference to bowel perforation as a risk, albeit it does make reference to peptic ulceration. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess BNF information and review literature on bowel perforation risk in patients with diverticular disease.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In light of the findings from your report, we have carried out an assessment of the information currently contained in the BNF relating to prednisolone and the corticosteroids drug class, and reviewed relevant literature regarding the risk of bowel perforation in patients with diverticular disease. The result of that research is that, within the “Cautions” section of all corticosteroid monographs in the BNF, we will add “diverticular disease (increased risk of diverticular perforation)”. This will be actioned for the August online monthly update. The “Cautions” section of BNF content is used to highlight specific clinical situations in which the use of a drug for a given patient is known to present a risk of harm that is greater than usual and therefore a healthcare professional should be aware so that they can weigh the risks and benefits for their individual patient.”

Source location

Response from BNF Publications
Page 1 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add diverticular disease and increased risk of diverticular perforation to the Cautions section of all corticosteroid monographs in the August online update.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In light of the findings from your report, we have carried out an assessment of the information currently contained in the BNF relating to prednisolone and the corticosteroids drug class, and reviewed relevant literature regarding the risk of bowel perforation in patients with diverticular disease. The result of that research is that, within the “Cautions” section of all corticosteroid monographs in the BNF, we will add “diverticular disease (increased risk of diverticular perforation)”. This will be actioned for the August online monthly update. The “Cautions” section of BNF content is used to highlight specific clinical situations in which the use of a drug for a given patient is known to present a risk of harm that is greater than usual and therefore a healthcare professional should be aware so that they can weigh the risks and benefits for their individual patient.”

Source location

Response from BNF Publications
Page 1 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing medicines reconciliation policies were applied and detected the dosage error before harm occurred.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust’s policies concerning medicines reconciliation on admission and discharge were applied and did pick up the dosage error before any harm came to the patient. The picture was confused as Mr Robert’s summary care record and GP list recorded his dose as ████████ on alternate days. This was a causative factor in the discrepancy not being picked up on the admission reconciliation. The error was picked up at the discharge reconciliation and recorded on the ePMA system in an ‘intervention note’ but hindsight should also have been recorded on the Trust’s incident management system-Datix.”

Source location

Response from Royal Cronwall Hospitals NHS Trust
Page 8 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing procedures did not require reporting a no-harm dosage discrepancy to the GP when no post-discharge GP action was needed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As stated in evidence during the inquest hearing over 12 - 14 April 2023, the dosage discrepancy caused no harm to Mr Roberts and there was no action required by the GP in relation to the dose discrepancy of ████████ doses administered from the 7th-13th June. It is not within our procedures to communicate to the GP incidents that cause no harm to the patient and require no action by the GP following discharge.”

Source location

Response from Royal Cronwall Hospitals NHS Trust
Page 8 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    The ePMA records indicate that treating and discharging physicians were aware of the dosage error.

    Stated by Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The ePMA records indicate that treating and discharging physicians were aware of the dosage error.

Verbatim wording from the response

“RCHT Consultants accepted that the dosage error was a serious mistake. Furthermore, this mistake was not drawn to the patient John’s attention or to the attention of the GP via the discharge summary, which made no reference to the dosage error. It was unclear whether treating physicians or discharging physicians were aware of the dosage error.”

Source location

Response from Royal Cronwall Hospitals NHS Trust
Page 8 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026