PFD report

Audrey Lily Kelly · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Apr 2014•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to provide out-of-hours and hospital emergency department clinicians with direct access to patients’ GP notes
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care servicesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable consolidation and access to patients’ cross-service clinical risk information
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Work with Mastercall to provide fit-for-purpose mobile access to relevant patient information at the point of care through a governed improvement project.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 April 2014.
  2. Action

    Seek formal assurance from Mastercall on new-starter processes and contingencies for practitioners without NHS Smartcards.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 April 2014.
  3. Action

    Map and analyse shared-record access processes and systems with Mastercall to identify and mitigate further risks.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 April 2014.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide out-of-hours and hospital emergency department clinicians with direct access to patients’ GP notes

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the evidence it was made very clear to me by the attending doctor who prescribed the medication and also by the nurse who took the call at the Out of Hours service that they could not /are not allowed to obtain and see the electronic notes held by the patient's own GP. This fact was backed up by a senior administrator of the Out of Hours service who reiterated that neither they nor the hospital Emergency Departments, have direct access to GP Notes. It seems to me that this is a serious lapse in the procedures and will inevitably lead to further lives being lost when, if the notes were available, those lives might be saved. In the case of the Out of Hours service it seems particularly absurd that these notes are not available when in fact the Out of Hours doctor is deputising for that very GP who not allowing access to the notes. It would appear therefore that there is an immediate need for directions to be issued to ALL OUT OF HOURS PROVIDERS and the appropriate Clinical Commissioning Groups to the effect that there must be free and unfettered access to ALL the GP notes in these circumstances. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care services; Unreliable consolidation and access to patients’ cross-service clinical risk information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with Mastercall to provide fit-for-purpose mobile access to relevant patient information at the point of care through a governed improvement project.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Stockport CCG is already engaged in continual improvement work in this area. However, as a result of this investigation, the CCG is also planning the following measures:”

Source location

2014-0155-Response-by-Department-of-Health2
Page 2 · response
Published 8 April 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Seek formal assurance from Mastercall on new-starter processes and contingencies for practitioners without NHS Smartcards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Stockport CCG is already engaged in continual improvement work in this area. However, as a result of this investigation, the CCG is also planning the following measures:”

Source location

2014-0155-Response-by-Department-of-Health2
Page 2 · response
Published 8 April 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Map and analyse shared-record access processes and systems with Mastercall to identify and mitigate further risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Stockport CCG is already engaged in continual improvement work in this area. However, as a result of this investigation, the CCG is also planning the following measures:”

Source location

2014-0155-Response-by-Department-of-Health2
Page 2 · response
Published 8 April 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026