PFD report

Mark Anthony Fernandez · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Mar 2025•Manchester North

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
4

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
31

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to utilise hospital passports
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable use of hospital passports to support safe care
  2. Failure to provide adequate information about care needs in referrals to specialist services
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient detail in referrals for safe risk assessment and prioritisation
  3. Failure to take account of long-term carers' and social services' views and knowledge in best interest decisions
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to obtain relevant collateral information from family and social supportsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable best-interests decision-making processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.14

  1. Action

    Work with the commissioned IMCA service to ensure information is shared with decision-makers when interested persons are not invited to medical best-interest meetings.

    Stated by Oldham Borough CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  2. Action

    Create and disseminate a risk-rating framework for safe attendance decisions at other organisations’ medical best-interests meetings, including information-sharing considerations.

    Stated by Oldham Council ASCStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  3. Action

    Implement Patient Care Alert procedures to verify contact details, contact care providers, obtain Hospital Passports, and record unresolved information for nursing follow-up.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 March 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The initial absence of the Hospital Passport did not impact the patient’s care, although its immediate availability remains important.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to utilise hospital passports

Wider context from the report

“1. The hospital passport was not utilised. 2. A best interest decision was made without taking into account the views of the long-term carers and social services and their knowledge of him as an individual. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable use of hospital passports to support safe care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide adequate information about care needs in referrals to specialist services

Wider context from the report

“1. The referral to the specialist service did not provide adequate information as to his level of care needs to help assist the service conduct an appropriate examination. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient detail in referrals for safe risk assessment and prioritisation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to take account of long-term carers' and social services' views and knowledge in best interest decisions

Wider context from the report

“1. The hospital passport was not utilised. 2. A best interest decision was made without taking into account the views of the long-term carers and social services and their knowledge of him as an individual. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to obtain relevant collateral information from family and social supports; Unreliable best-interests decision-making processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with the commissioned IMCA service to ensure information is shared with decision-makers when interested persons are not invited to medical best-interest meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Council can also confirm that the commissioned IMCA service is able to cover medical best interest decisions. adult social care will work with them to ensure that where they feel interested persons have not been invited to medical best interest decision meetings, they ensure appropriate information is shared with the organisation leading the decision.”

Source location

Response from Oldham Council
Page 1 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create and disseminate a risk-rating framework for safe attendance decisions at other organisations’ medical best-interests meetings, including information-sharing considerations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Risk rating framework to support practitioners to make safe and informed decisions regarding attendance at medical best interest’s meetings led by other organisations to be created and disseminated across ASC.”

Source location

Response from Oldham Council - Action Plan
Page 1 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement Patient Care Alert procedures to verify contact details, contact care providers, obtain Hospital Passports, and record unresolved information for nursing follow-up.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Patient Care Alert (“PCA”)”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Roll out and develop the updated mental-capacity ward audit programme, including training lead nurses and reporting findings through governance groups.

Verbatim wording from the response

“MCA audits”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
Page 6 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver commissioned education sessions on Mental Capacity Act incapacitated-consent requirements and the importance of carers’ views in best-interest decisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“MCA training”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
Page 6 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete the multidisciplinary review of the Enhanced Patient Observation policy to address learning disability needs and active Hospital Passport use.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Review of the Learning and Disabilities and Autism policy and Enhanced Patient Observation (“EPO”) policy”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add a Hospital Passport prompt and learning disability indicator to the patient-status-at-a-glance board.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. A prompt will now appear on the ‘patient status at a glance’ board (the bed board) when a Hospital Passport is available and in use. This will reiterate the policy provision with regard to the visibility and prominence of Hospital Passports. The board features a learning disability symbol and staff can include written confirmation of “Hospital Passport in place”.”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use and further develop the Enhanced Patient Observation audit tool and targeted training to improve person-centred observation practice and quality assurance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Enhanced Patient Observation (“EPO”) policy review and audit tool”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
Page 5 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the Learning Disability and Autism Policy to add guidance on specialist referrals and Hospital Passport use.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Review of the Learning and Disabilities and Autism policy and Enhanced Patient Observation (“EPO”) policy”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate the Share Learning Take 5 education on learning disability care, diagnostic overshadowing, communication, Hospital Passports and carer involvement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Share Learning Take 5”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Define Mental Capacity Act and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards training to support wider practical application beyond DoLS authorisation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust Level 3 safeguarding adult mandatory training programme has a significant focus on the MCA and its application in practice. Current organisational compliance with Level 3 Safeguarding adult training is at 95%. MCA and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) training have been better defined to support the application of MCA beyond the requirement for application of a DoLS authorisation to ensure the MCA is more effectively considered for a wider group of patients, including those with learning disabilities. The application of the MCA is essential to the EPO procedures to ensure the least restrictive option of observation and support is provided.”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
Page 6 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Red-flag patients with learning disabilities or Hospital Passports in daily safety huddles and assign senior nurse oversight of vulnerable patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Daily safety huddles Further to the PCA, any patient with a learning disability/Hospital Passport will automatically be ‘red flagged’ during daily safety huddles for nursing staff. This adds a further layer of awareness of this cohort of patients and their specific needs. The senior nurse (ward manager) will have oversight of vulnerable patients.”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue quarterly Senior Nurse Walkabout reviews of learning disability identification, safety-huddle flags, Hospital Passport availability and currency.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Senior Nurse Walkabout”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
Page 5 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind staff to check for and seek Hospital Passports at every presentation, regardless of whether records or systems identify one.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• As a health and care system, we recognise the importance of Hospital Passports. Staff have been reminded to immediately aware of and seek out whether a Hospital Passport is held, regardless of whether or not one is noted on the patient records, Trust or community systems or is available at any given presentation to services for care.”

Source location

Response from NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Partnership Board
Page 2 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The initial absence of the Hospital Passport did not impact the patient’s care, although its immediate availability remains important.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust’s review determined that Mr Fernandez’s care was not impacted by the initial absence of the Hospital Passport. Notwithstanding this however, the Trust recognises that it’s proper utilisation depends on hospital staff being immediately aware as to the need for this document to accompany a patient with a learning disability or if one is not available to create one.”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.17

  1. 1

    Train duty workers to cover the Learning Disabilities and Autism hospital-discharge tracking role when the named worker is unavailable.

    Stated by Oldham Council ASCStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  2. 2

    Add learning and guidance documents to the Adult Social Care SharePoint site for ongoing practitioner use.

    Stated by Oldham Council ASCStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  3. 3

    Add the learning to mental-capacity-act theory-to-practice training.

    Stated by Oldham Council ASCStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  4. 4

    Assign responsibility for hospital-discharge work to a named worker within the Learning Disabilities and Autism Team.

    Stated by Oldham Council ASCStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  5. 5

    Establish proactive hospital-admission tracking and multiagency engagement by the named Learning Disabilities and Autism hospital-discharge worker.

    Stated by Oldham Council ASCStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  6. 6

    Create and disseminate a seven-minute briefing across Adult Social Care on learning from the case.

    Stated by Oldham Council ASCStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  7. 7

    Review how acute hospital admissions and discharges are managed by Adult Social Care mental-health teams.

    Stated by Oldham Council ASCStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  8. 8

    Ensure Adult Social Care mental-health teams track supported individuals’ admissions and engage fully in hospital admission and discharge planning.

    Stated by Oldham Council ASCStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  9. 9

    Complete Oliver McGowan Part 1 learning disability and autism training for Trust staff under the mandated programme.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  10. 10

    Develop Oliver McGowan trainer capability for Tiers 1 and 2 training.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  11. 11

    Audit monthly compliance with arrival checks for contact details and cross-referencing ambulance arrivals with patient report forms.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  12. 12

    Share learning from this PFD with Greater Manchester acute hospitals and the wider health and care system through Assistant Directors of Quality networks.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  13. 13

    Monitor Oliver McGowan mandatory training compliance and completion rates at Directorate and Trust levels.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  14. 14

    Share learning from the locality practice review across Greater Manchester.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  15. 15

    Conduct a locality practice review with stakeholders to improve care for patients with learning disabilities and complex needs in Oldham.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  16. 16

    Remind staff about safeguarding vulnerable patients and referral responsibilities and mechanisms through a Take 5 Briefing.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  17. 17

    Remind staff of their responsibilities towards patients with learning disabilities and complex needs through a Take 5 Briefing.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 March 2025.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Separate concerns are assigned to Northern Care Alliance, Oldham Social Services and Oldham Independent Mental Health Advocate for response.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Train duty workers to cover the Learning Disabilities and Autism hospital-discharge tracking role when the named worker is unavailable.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Learning Disabilities and Autism Team to train duty workers to cover this role when the named worker is not available.”

Source location

Response from Oldham Council - Action Plan
Page 3 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add learning and guidance documents to the Adult Social Care SharePoint site for ongoing practitioner use.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Documents to be added to ASC SharePoint site as ongoing practitioner learning and guidance.”

Source location

Response from Oldham Council - Action Plan
Page 1 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add the learning to mental-capacity-act theory-to-practice training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Learning to be added to MCA theory to practice training.”

Source location

Response from Oldham Council - Action Plan
Page 1 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assign responsibility for hospital-discharge work to a named worker within the Learning Disabilities and Autism Team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Key Actions: Learning Disabilities and Autism Team to assign responsibility for hospital discharge work to a named worker within the service.”

Source location

Response from Oldham Council - Action Plan
Page 3 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish proactive hospital-admission tracking and multiagency engagement by the named Learning Disabilities and Autism hospital-discharge worker.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Named Learning Disabilities and Autism hospital discharge worker to proactively track people open to the team who are admitted to acute hospital and fully engage in multiagency working.”

Source location

Response from Oldham Council - Action Plan
Page 3 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create and disseminate a seven-minute briefing across Adult Social Care on learning from the case.

Verbatim wording from the response

“7 Minute briefing to be created and disseminated across ASC re: Learning from the case of MF.”

Source location

Response from Oldham Council - Action Plan
Page 1 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review how acute hospital admissions and discharges are managed by Adult Social Care mental-health teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“ASC Mental Health teams to review how acute hospital admissions and discharges are managed by their area of service.”

Source location

Response from Oldham Council - Action Plan
Page 3 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure Adult Social Care mental-health teams track supported individuals’ admissions and engage fully in hospital admission and discharge planning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“ASC Mental Health Teams to ensure individuals open to their teams are appropriately tracked and full engagement in multi-agency working is in place from ASC re the hospital admission and discharge planning.”

Source location

Response from Oldham Council - Action Plan
Page 3 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete Oliver McGowan Part 1 learning disability and autism training for Trust staff under the mandated programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Oliver McGowan training”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop Oliver McGowan trainer capability for Tiers 1 and 2 training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Oliver McGowan training”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit monthly compliance with arrival checks for contact details and cross-referencing ambulance arrivals with patient report forms.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Hospital systems containing next of kin contact details must be checked for accuracy and updated on a patient’s arrival to the hospital. The Emergency Department Lead Nurse will raise this at an Emergency Department reception team meeting so that patient contact details are confirmed and if a patient has arrived by ambulance, cross referenced with the PRF (patient report form) on arrival.”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share learning from this PFD with Greater Manchester acute hospitals and the wider health and care system through Assistant Directors of Quality networks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Learning from this PFD will be shared specifically with the GM acute hospitals and the wider health and care system through the NHS GM Assistant Directors of Quality networks.”

Source location

Response from NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Partnership Board
Page 2 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor Oliver McGowan mandatory training compliance and completion rates at Directorate and Trust levels.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Compliance with the Oliver McGowan mandatory training and completion rates are being monitored at Directorate and Trust levels.”

Source location

Response from NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Partnership Board
Page 2 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share learning from the locality practice review across Greater Manchester.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A locality practice review process has begun in partnership with key stakeholders to lead forward improvement work in Oldham for patients who have a learning disability and complex needs to improve the care experience for our most vulnerable patients and residents. Learning from the”

Source location

Response from NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Partnership Board
Page 1 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a locality practice review with stakeholders to improve care for patients with learning disabilities and complex needs in Oldham.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A locality practice review process has begun in partnership with key stakeholders to lead forward improvement work in Oldham for patients who have a learning disability and complex needs to improve the care experience for our most vulnerable patients and residents. Learning from the”

Source location

Response from NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Partnership Board
Page 1 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind staff about safeguarding vulnerable patients and referral responsibilities and mechanisms through a Take 5 Briefing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Staff have been reminded via a Take 5 Briefing (attached with this letter) of the importance of Safeguarding vulnerable patients and the responsibilities and mechanisms of making referrals.”

Source location

Response from NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Partnership Board
Page 2 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind staff of their responsibilities towards patients with learning disabilities and complex needs through a Take 5 Briefing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Staff have been reminded via a Take 5 Briefing (attached with this letter) of their responsibilities towards patients with learning disabilities and complex needs.”

Source location

Response from NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Partnership Board
Page 2 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Separate concerns are assigned to Northern Care Alliance, Oldham Social Services and Oldham Independent Mental Health Advocate for response.

Verbatim wording from the response

“An investigation into this matter of concern has been undertaken by ████████, Associate Director Quality & Safety (Oldham) and ████████, Assistant Director Patient Services, both of NHS GM. I understand that separate matters of concern have been directed to Northern Care Alliance, Oldham Social Services and Oldham Independent Mental Health Advocate and that they will be provided their responses.”

Source location

Response from NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Partnership Board
Page 1 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
4/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026