PFD report

Margaret Aitchison · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 Sep 2024•South Yorkshire (Eastern)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of formal systems for checking residents after fire alarm activations
  2. Failure to effectively cascade care processes, protocols and expectations to staff providing care to residents
  3. Failure to effectively cascade care processes, protocols and expectations to staff
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Cascade lessons learned to sister services across the organisation’s portfolio.

    Stated by Pristine Care Group LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 9 September 2024.
  2. Action

    Implement revised care processes and protocols addressing identified shortfalls.

    Stated by Pristine Care Group LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 9 September 2024.
  3. Action

    Conduct regular senior-management audits to identify discrepancies in care processes and protocols.

    Stated by Pristine Care Group LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 9 September 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing protocols, addressed shortfalls and regular senior-management audits are considered sufficient to identify and prevent future discrepancies.

    Stated by Pristine Care Group LimitedExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of formal systems for checking residents after fire alarm activations

Wider context from the report

“The evidence from a care worker who was at the home at the relevant time, and remains a care worker at the home, that there are still no formal systems for checking of residents after fire alarm activations, is at odds with the evidence I heard from the care manager that there had been comprehensive changes and a training programme implemented. I am concerned that the processes, protocols and expectations have not been effectively cascaded to those providing care to residents in homes. Accordingly, I invite you to consider the following and in particular whether there is a need for: 1. Further training of senior staff. 2. A requirement for senior staff to each put in place clear processes for staff to respond to fire alarm activations. 3. Training of carers, and any other relevant staff members, in terms of checking resident safety and fire door exits. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to effectively cascade care processes, protocols and expectations to staff providing care to residents

Wider context from the report

“The evidence from a care worker who was at the home at the relevant time, and remains a care worker at the home, that there are still no formal systems for checking of residents after fire alarm activations, is at odds with the evidence I heard from the care manager that there had been comprehensive changes and a training programme implemented. I am concerned that the processes, protocols and expectations have not been effectively cascaded to those providing care to residents in homes. Accordingly, I invite you to consider the following and in particular whether there is a need for: 1. Further training of senior staff. 2. A requirement for senior staff to each put in place clear processes for staff to respond to fire alarm activations. 3. Training of carers, and any other relevant staff members, in terms of checking resident safety and fire door exits. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to effectively cascade care processes, protocols and expectations to staff

Wider context from the report

“The evidence from a care worker who was at the home at the relevant time, and remains a care worker at the home, that there are still no formal systems for checking of residents after fire alarm activations, is at odds with the evidence I heard from the care manager that there had been comprehensive changes and a training programme implemented. I am concerned that the processes, protocols and expectations have not been effectively cascaded to those providing care to residents in homes. Accordingly, I invite you to consider the following and in particular whether there is a need for: 1. Further training of senior staff. 2. A requirement for senior staff to each put in place clear processes for staff to respond to fire alarm activations. 3. Training of carers, and any other relevant staff members, in terms of checking resident safety and fire door exits. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of formal systems for checking residents after fire alarm activations

Wider context from the report

“The evidence from a care worker who was at the home at the relevant time, and remains a care worker at the home, that there are still no formal systems for checking of residents after fire alarm activations, is at odds with the evidence I heard from the care manager that there had been comprehensive changes and a training programme implemented. I am concerned that the processes, protocols and expectations have not been effectively cascaded to those providing care to residents in homes. Accordingly, I invite you to consider the following and in particular whether there is a need for: 1. Further training of senior staff. 2. A requirement for senior staff to each put in place clear processes for staff to respond to fire alarm activations. 3. Training of carers, and any other relevant staff members, in terms of checking resident safety and fire door exits. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably monitor vulnerable residents during fire emergencies and drills.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Cascade lessons learned to sister services across the organisation’s portfolio.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As always the ethos of the organisation is ensuring the safety of our residents is paramount and the lessons learnt have been cascaded to our sister services within the portfolio.”

Source location

Response from Pristine Care Group
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement revised care processes and protocols addressing identified shortfalls.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm and agree with the statement made by my colleague ████████ when she gave evidence that the processes and protocols put in place after reviewing the original items are definitely in place (some of which were with immediate effect) and as an organisation we are confident as we can be that any identified shortfalls have been addressed and the auditing duties carried out by the senior management team on a regular basis should highlight any discrepancies in the future. I can also confirm that a CQC inspector visited the care home only this week to review the protocols after receiving notification from your office and she was more than happy with improvements made.”

Source location

Response from Pristine Care Group
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct regular senior-management audits to identify discrepancies in care processes and protocols.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm and agree with the statement made by my colleague ████████ when she gave evidence that the processes and protocols put in place after reviewing the original items are definitely in place (some of which were with immediate effect) and as an organisation we are confident as we can be that any identified shortfalls have been addressed and the auditing duties carried out by the senior management team on a regular basis should highlight any discrepancies in the future. I can also confirm that a CQC inspector visited the care home only this week to review the protocols after receiving notification from your office and she was more than happy with improvements made.”

Source location

Response from Pristine Care Group
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing protocols, addressed shortfalls and regular senior-management audits are considered sufficient to identify and prevent future discrepancies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm and agree with the statement made by my colleague ████████ when she gave evidence that the processes and protocols put in place after reviewing the original items are definitely in place (some of which were with immediate effect) and as an organisation we are confident as we can be that any identified shortfalls have been addressed and the auditing duties carried out by the senior management team on a regular basis should highlight any discrepancies in the future. I can also confirm that a CQC inspector visited the care home only this week to review the protocols after receiving notification from your office and she was more than happy with improvements made.”

Source location

Response from Pristine Care Group
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026