PFD report

Malcolm James BASTEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Dec 2022•Surrey

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Lack of mandatory accredited health and safety training for principal contractors before project engagement
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate formal health and safety training for responsible staff
  2. Lack of mandatory accredited health and safety training for principal contractors after a project incident
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate formal health and safety training for responsible staff
  3. Lack of mandatory HSE notification of projects undertaken by principal contractors after an incident
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    CDM skills, knowledge and experience requirements, supported by guidance, are considered sufficient without mandatory accredited principal-contractor training.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of mandatory accredited health and safety training for principal contractors before project engagement

Wider context from the report

“2. There is no mandatory requirement for the principal contractor to undertake health and safety training from an accredited organisation before engaging in this type of project. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate formal health and safety training for responsible staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of mandatory accredited health and safety training for principal contractors after a project incident

Wider context from the report

“3. There is no mandatory requirement for principal contractors to undertake health and safety training from an accredited organisation after an incident such as this has occurred on one of their projects, nor to notify the HSE of any projects they undertake thereafter. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate formal health and safety training for responsible staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of mandatory HSE notification of projects undertaken by principal contractors after an incident

Wider context from the report

“3. There is no mandatory requirement for principal contractors to undertake health and safety training from an accredited organisation after an incident such as this has occurred on one of their projects, nor to notify the HSE of any projects they undertake thereafter. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of mandatory statutory agency inspection during construction

Wider context from the report

“1. This was a sizable project with considerable work at height. No statutory agency was required to be notified of the work and then inspect the project during the construction. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of mandatory notification of construction work to a statutory agency

Wider context from the report

“1. This was a sizable project with considerable work at height. No statutory agency was required to be notified of the work and then inspect the project during the construction. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

CDM skills, knowledge and experience requirements, supported by guidance, are considered sufficient without mandatory accredited principal-contractor training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although there is no mandatory requirement for the duty holder to undertake health and safety training Regulation 8 of CDM requires that anyone undertaking construction work must be able to demonstrate that they have the appropriate health and safety skills, knowledge, experience. Where they are an organisation, the organisation should have the capability to carry out the work in a way that secures health and safety. If the dutyholder cannot demonstrate that they have these attributes then they should not accept the work.”

Source location

Response from Health and Safety Executive
Page 2 · response
Published 9 January 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Current notification thresholds identify significant projects and help target finite regulatory resources; expanding them would add burdens without significant benefit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“For the year 2021/22 there were 51,530 new notifications of construction projects in Great Britain. This figure doesn’t include ongoing projects previously notified. Many more construction sites don’t meet the threshold for notification and go ahead without any formal notification, such as the site Mr Basten was working on.”

Source location

Response from Health and Safety Executive
Page 2 · response
Published 9 January 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing enforcement arrangements address post-incident capability concerns; previous performance informs future enforcement without mandatory training or project notification.

Verbatim wording from the response

“HSE’s Enforcement Policy Statement (EPS) sets out the principles inspectors should apply when determining what enforcement action to take in response to breaches of health and safety legislation. Fundamental to this is the principle that enforcement action should be proportional to the health and safety risks and the seriousness of the breach. This means that if a lack of health and safety capability played a part in an incident, then requiring a dutyholder to undertake training will be a potential line of enforcement for HSE.”

Source location

Response from Health and Safety Executive
Page 3 · response
Published 9 January 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026