PFD report

Gavin Anthony ROBERTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Mar 2014•Rotherham

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to set speed restrictions appropriate to the safe negotiation speed of the bend and approach to the bridge
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate speed control at hazardous road locationsPart of recurring concern: Uncontrolled collision risks at hazardous road bends
  2. Inadequate warning signs at the bend and bridge approach
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signagePart of recurring concern: Inadequate speed control at hazardous road locationsPart of recurring concern: Uncontrolled collision risks at hazardous road bends
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Prepare legal orders and consult interested parties to progress the proposed speed-limit amendment on Rollings Lane.

    Stated by Environment & Development ServicesStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 March 2014.
  2. Action

    Investigate collisions, traffic speeds, speed-limit suitability and warning-sign adequacy on Rollings Lane.

    Stated by Environment & Development ServicesStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 March 2014.
  3. Action

    Install a new bend-warning sign, reflective verge marker posts and a repainted SLOW road marking near the railway bridge.

    Stated by Environment & Development ServicesStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 March 2014.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to set speed restrictions appropriate to the safe negotiation speed of the bend and approach to the bridge

Wider context from the report

“(1) The current speed restriction of 60 mph is higher than the maximum speed at which The bend can safely be negotiated. (2) The speed restriction actually increases from 40 mph to 60 mph on the approach to the bridge. (3) The warning signs appear to be inadequate in the presence of (1) and (2) above given the number of recorded incidents at this location. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate speed control at hazardous road locations; Uncontrolled collision risks at hazardous road bends.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate warning signs at the bend and bridge approach

Wider context from the report

“(1) The current speed restriction of 60 mph is higher than the maximum speed at which The bend can safely be negotiated. (2) The speed restriction actually increases from 40 mph to 60 mph on the approach to the bridge. (3) The warning signs appear to be inadequate in the presence of (1) and (2) above given the number of recorded incidents at this location. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road warning signage; Inadequate speed control at hazardous road locations; Uncontrolled collision risks at hazardous road bends.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Prepare legal orders and consult interested parties to progress the proposed speed-limit amendment on Rollings Lane.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to reduce the number of collisions taking place and to ensure the speed limit is more appropriate to the characteristics, environment and measured speeds on the road, it is proposed to amend the speed limit to 50 mph, subject to cGIsG the necessary approvals and agreements, as shown on the attached plan.”

Source location

Response from Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
Page 1 · response
Published 14 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Investigate collisions, traffic speeds, speed-limit suitability and warning-sign adequacy on Rollings Lane.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have noted your concerns about the speed limit and warning signs currently in place on the section of Rollings Lane where the fatal collision took place. As a result we have carried out an investigation that has involved looking at the number and circumstances of collisions that have taken place, the speed of traffic, the suitability of the current speed limit and the adequacy of existing warning signs.”

Source location

Response from Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
Page 1 · response
Published 14 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install a new bend-warning sign, reflective verge marker posts and a repainted SLOW road marking near the railway bridge.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, it is planned to improve the warning of the bend near the railway bridge when travelling towards Thrybergh by providing a new bend warning sign, reflective verge marker posts around the bend and repainting an existing ‘SLOW’ marking. These proposals are also shown on the attached drawing.”

Source location

Response from Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
Page 2 · response
Published 14 March 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026