PFD report

Josh Yemi TARRANT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Feb 2026•Kent and Medway

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
19

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of ABD training for prison healthcare staff
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate prison staff training for responding to medical emergencies
  2. Failure of prison nurses to recognise ABD and treat it as a medical emergency
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute behavioural disturbance
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Develop and communicate a national framework defining healthcare roles and responsibilities for use-of-force incidents and ABD warning signs.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  2. Action

    Ensure establishments include clear ABD red-flag criteria and emergency escalation pathways in healthcare training and operational briefings, with governance review of incidents.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 10 February 2026.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    The available reviews do not identify ABD or excited delirium, suggesting the presentation was related to cocaine use and an undiagnosed heart condition.

    Stated by NHS EnglandDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of ABD training for prison healthcare staff

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that: (a) No training is provided to prison healthcare staff in relation to ABD (despite the clear advice of PSO 1600). (b) If prison nurses remain unaware of ABD and the need to treat it as a medical emergency, then further deaths are likely in future. Accordingly, this situation should be reviewed and consideration given as to whether any steps should be taken to reduce the risk of death by from ABD. In particular, training of prison clinicians should be carefully reviewed at a national level. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate prison staff training for responding to medical emergencies.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of prison nurses to recognise ABD and treat it as a medical emergency

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that: (a) No training is provided to prison healthcare staff in relation to ABD (despite the clear advice of PSO 1600). (b) If prison nurses remain unaware of ABD and the need to treat it as a medical emergency, then further deaths are likely in future. Accordingly, this situation should be reviewed and consideration given as to whether any steps should be taken to reduce the risk of death by from ABD. In particular, training of prison clinicians should be carefully reviewed at a national level. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute behavioural disturbance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and communicate a national framework defining healthcare roles and responsibilities for use-of-force incidents and ABD warning signs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In 2025 NHS England developed a framework for healthcare roles and responsibilities for planned and unplanned use of force in adult prisons and immigration removal centres which was communicated to all healthcare providers in August 2025. This framework supports HMPPS and Home Office policy documents and makes clear healthcare requirement to attend all planned, and where possible, unplanned use of force incidents.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure establishments include clear ABD red-flag criteria and emergency escalation pathways in healthcare training and operational briefings, with governance review of incidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will be sharing the details of this report with all prison and Immigration Removal Centre healthcare providers with an action to ensure all establishments have a clear red flag criteria and emergency escalation pathway within existing healthcare training structures and operation briefings. This should include a focus on early recognition of deterioration, prompt ambulance activation where indicated, minimising restraint duration and maintaining continuous observation until handover, with routine governance review of such incidents.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The available reviews do not identify ABD or excited delirium, suggesting the presentation was related to cocaine use and an undiagnosed heart condition.

Verbatim wording from the response

“South East Regional Colleagues have shared reports around the Trust’s PSII and PPOs independent review. South East Regional Colleagues have advised that both sets of reports identify that clinical staff should receive training in managing violence, aggression and mental health crises, as well as the fact some actions taken by staff, particularly around restraint, were not with current guidance and policy. Neither report shared mentions ABD or ‘Excited Delirium’, suggesting that Mr Tarrant’s presentation”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Prison healthcare staff cannot reasonably be expected to diagnose ABD reliably; safety depends on recognising severe agitation, physiological red flags and emergency escalation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Given the rarity and complexity of ABD and the operational realities of prisons, it is not reasonable to expect prison healthcare staff to diagnose ABD reliably. The critical safety issue is recognition of severe agitation accompanied by physiological red flags and escalation as a medical emergency.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.17

  1. 1

    Discuss received Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group to share learning and identify emerging trends requiring review or action.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  2. 2

    Table the case findings, information and learning at a future Health and Justice Delivery Oversight Group meeting.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  3. 3

    Share the report with all prison and immigration removal centre healthcare providers.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  4. 4

    Reinforce the ‘Call Don’t Fall’ and ‘Stay in the Bay’ safety campaigns across all sites.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  5. 5

    Deliver targeted falls-prevention training and maintain the Falls Champion programme with training at least every three months.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  6. 6

    Implement the ‘Think Yellow’ falls-prevention campaign across the organisation after piloting it in both Emergency Departments.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  7. 7

    Provide updated falls-prevention information to patients and families through clinical-area leaflets.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  8. 8

    Embed standardised orthostatic blood-pressure guidance into ward observation processes.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  9. 9

    Implement the revised electronic falls risk assessment across the Trust.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  10. 10

    Reiterate the importance of senior escalation for anticoagulation continuation or reversal during monthly resident-doctor safety briefings.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  11. 11

    Plan a trial of falls-prevention sensors for beds, chairs and toilets in designated elderly-care and rehabilitation wards.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  12. 12

    Operate the monthly Harm Free Care Audit Programme, including falls-prevention compliance audits.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  13. 13

    Use a multidisciplinary Falls Steering Group to oversee evidence-based falls-prevention strategies.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  14. 14

    Monitor inpatient falls by clinical area and share the data monthly with clinical-area senior leaders.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  15. 15

    Trial and invest in hospital beds with integrated falls alarms for higher-risk clinical areas.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  16. 16

    Maintain a dedicated quality-improvement workstream to reduce inpatient falls.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  17. 17

    Provide a multidisciplinary post-falls review form through the incident reporting system.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 February 2026.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.3

  1. 1

    The risks of anticoagulation are not poorly understood; clinicians understand the risks and know where to obtain expert advice.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  2. 2

    Two falls risk assessments were all that was required for this admission: on Emergency Department attendance and after the inpatient fall.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  3. 3

    Existing 24/7 haematology advice and longstanding accessible anticoagulation reversal guidance provide established arrangements for managing anticoagulation risks.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss received Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group to share learning and identify emerging trends requiring review or action.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Mr Tarrant, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Table the case findings, information and learning at a future Health and Justice Delivery Oversight Group meeting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, the findings, information and any learning from this case will be tabled at a future NHS England Health and Justice Delivery Oversight Group (HJDOG). The HJDOG is the senior leadership forum, which holds responsibility for the oversight of delivery and continuous improvement in Health and Justice commissioned services, through both national and regional teams. All health and justice related Reports to Prevent Future Deaths are shared and discussed at the HJDOG, and assurance is sought from regions where learning and action is identified.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the report with all prison and immigration removal centre healthcare providers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will be sharing the details of this report with all prison and Immigration Removal Centre healthcare providers with an action to ensure all establishments have a clear red flag criteria and emergency escalation pathway within existing healthcare training structures and operation briefings. This should include a focus on early recognition of deterioration, prompt ambulance activation where indicated, minimising restraint duration and maintaining continuous observation until handover, with routine governance review of such incidents.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reinforce the ‘Call Don’t Fall’ and ‘Stay in the Bay’ safety campaigns across all sites.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Prior to the inquest, two safety campaigns had already been initiated, including the relaunch of ‘Stay in the Bay’ and ‘Call Don’t Fall’. Both have now been reinforced across all sites. ‘Call Don’t Fall’ posters have been displayed in clinical areas, including all patient bathrooms in the organisation. ‘Stay in the Bay’ lanyards have been provided to all clinical areas for staff to use, to empower staff to decline leaving the bay / specific patient if providing enhanced / 1:1 care.”

Source location

Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver targeted falls-prevention training and maintain the Falls Champion programme with training at least every three months.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Targeted falls prevention training has been delivered across Heatherwood Hospital, Heathlands and Farnham Rehabilitation settings, alongside the introduction of a ‘Falls Champion’ programme to embed best practice at ward level. Training has been delivered to the fall's champions, and this will occur as a minimum of every 3 months.”

Source location

Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the ‘Think Yellow’ falls-prevention campaign across the organisation after piloting it in both Emergency Departments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust is also in the process of implementing a national campaign for falls prevention, the ‘Think Yellow’ campaign. This is planned to strengthen staff and”

Source location

Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide updated falls-prevention information to patients and families through clinical-area leaflets.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of the quality improvement workstream, the Trust has a multidisciplinary Falls Steering Group to oversee delivery, ensuring the implementation of evidence-based prevention strategies and sustained organisational focus. In the last financial year falls prevention information has been updated to better support patients and families in understanding risks and contributing to prevention, via a leaflet. These are available in clinical areas.”

Source location

Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Embed standardised orthostatic blood-pressure guidance into ward observation processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Orthostatic blood pressure guidance has been standardised and embedded within ward observation processes to improve identification and management of falls risk factors. Easy to follow laminated guides on the correct assessment of lying and standing blood pressures have been attached to all observation machines in clinical areas.”

Source location

Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the revised electronic falls risk assessment across the Trust.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A falls risk assessment was performed on attendance in the Emergency Department and following Mr Tarrant’s inpatient fall. For Mr Tarrant’s admission, these 2 falls risk assessments were all that was required. (Patients should be risk assessed for falls on admission to clinical areas, after a fall, or when their clinical picture changes). However, the Hester Davis scoring system which was in use at the time was calculated inaccurately by staff. Prior to Mr Tarrant’s inquest, the Trust had already acknowledged that the Hester Davis falls risk assessment was not intuitive for staff to use and, scoring mistakes were noted. Therefore, the Trust re-designed a new falls risk assessment which was launched on the electronic patient record system. The new falls risk assessment was in progress at the time of Mr Tarrant’s fall, and the Trust had been working on this for >12 months.”

Source location

Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reiterate the importance of senior escalation for anticoagulation continuation or reversal during monthly resident-doctor safety briefings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, the Trust has long-standing published guidance on reversal of all anticoagulant agents, and these are available on the Trust intranet, and this is easily accessible on individual’s mobile devices. The guideline has been in place since 2021. At the time of Mr Tarrant’s incident, the Trust guidance was in place and available for all to access. The chief medical officer has monthly safety briefings in person to all resident doctors. Going forward, this briefing will be aiming to increase awareness to all the importance in escalating to senior level in such circumstances where there is a risk of continuing anticoagulation and/or where reversal is a consideration.”

Source location

Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 5 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Plan a trial of falls-prevention sensors for beds, chairs and toilets in designated elderly-care and rehabilitation wards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has also identified advanced falls monitoring solutions are available. A trial of new falls prevention equipment (sensors for beds, chairs and toilets) is currently planned for a Care of the Elderly ward at Frimley Park Hospital, with a planned trial to also include Farnham Community Hospital – rehabilitation ward with single en-suite rooms. If the trial is successful, a phased rollout of the equipment will occur across the Trust.”

Source location

Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate the monthly Harm Free Care Audit Programme, including falls-prevention compliance audits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has a Harm Free Care Audit Programme which aims to promote high standards of nursing care. The Harm Free Care Audit Programme was introduced in July 2025 as a monthly audit, to be completed by senior ward leaders, and encompasses key aspects of nursing care including falls prevention. Twenty-five per cent of the patients in a clinical area are audited. This audit tool is one of several methods available to monitor compliance with nursing care standards, including spot checks on the ward and compliance monitoring by senior ward leaders.”

Source location

Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use a multidisciplinary Falls Steering Group to oversee evidence-based falls-prevention strategies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of the quality improvement workstream, the Trust has a multidisciplinary Falls Steering Group to oversee delivery, ensuring the implementation of evidence-based prevention strategies and sustained organisational focus. In the last financial year falls prevention information has been updated to better support patients and families in understanding risks and contributing to prevention, via a leaflet. These are available in clinical areas.”

Source location

Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor inpatient falls by clinical area and share the data monthly with clinical-area senior leaders.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A simplified multidisciplinary team review form has been developed to support frontline teams in undertaking timely, structured post-falls reviews and identifying learning. This is also available on our incident reporting system, ‘In-Phase’. The Trust monitors the number of inpatient falls and in which clinical areas these occur and the data is shared with the senior leaders of the clinical areas every month.”

Source location

Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Trial and invest in hospital beds with integrated falls alarms for higher-risk clinical areas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has trialled new hospital beds with integrated falls alarms and the Trust has invested in some of these beds. Falls data analysis has been used to identify high-risk clinical areas that would benefit most from these beds and other interventions.”

Source location

Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain a dedicated quality-improvement workstream to reduce inpatient falls.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has a dedicated quality improvement workstream to reducing the number of inpatient falls and this is led by one of our senior nurses. This workstream has been in place for the last 2 years. Nationally, the Royal College of Physicians state that approximately 20% of inpatient falls are preventable. Over the last financial year, the Trust has reduced the incidence of inpatient falls by 12% and the incidence of inpatient falls is currently at the lowest number the Trust has had for the last 5 years. It was unfortunate this was not communicated to the coroner as this would have provided a clearer view of initiatives undertaken in the Trust.”

Source location

Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide a multidisciplinary post-falls review form through the incident reporting system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A simplified multidisciplinary team review form has been developed to support frontline teams in undertaking timely, structured post-falls reviews and identifying learning. This is also available on our incident reporting system, ‘In-Phase’. The Trust monitors the number of inpatient falls and in which clinical areas these occur and the data is shared with the senior leaders of the clinical areas every month.”

Source location

Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The risks of anticoagulation are not poorly understood; clinicians understand the risks and know where to obtain expert advice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our consultant haematologist on-call service is available 24/7, 365 days of the year, and it is very common for the consultant haematologist on-call to be contacted for advice in just this scenario. The Trust does not accept that the risks of anticoagulation are ‘poorly understood’, which was evidence provided to the coroner during the hearing. One of the Trust’s Consultant Haematologists confirms that in her experience clinicians are very aware of the risks of anticoagulation together with the risks of inappropriately stopping these agents. In other words, it was probable that the evidence regarding a ‘poor understanding’ was related to the risk benefit balance which is what can make such decisions difficult. There is good understanding of the risks in the case of a bleeding anticoagulated patient and clear understanding of where to obtain expert advice.”

Source location

Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 5 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Two falls risk assessments were all that was required for this admission: on Emergency Department attendance and after the inpatient fall.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A falls risk assessment was performed on attendance in the Emergency Department and following Mr Tarrant’s inpatient fall. For Mr Tarrant’s admission, these 2 falls risk assessments were all that was required. (Patients should be risk assessed for falls on admission to clinical areas, after a fall, or when their clinical picture changes). However, the Hester Davis scoring system which was in use at the time was calculated inaccurately by staff. Prior to Mr Tarrant’s inquest, the Trust had already acknowledged that the Hester Davis falls risk assessment was not intuitive for staff to use and, scoring mistakes were noted. Therefore, the Trust re-designed a new falls risk assessment which was launched on the electronic patient record system. The new falls risk assessment was in progress at the time of Mr Tarrant’s fall, and the Trust had been working on this for >12 months.”

Source location

Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing 24/7 haematology advice and longstanding accessible anticoagulation reversal guidance provide established arrangements for managing anticoagulation risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our consultant haematologist on-call service is available 24/7, 365 days of the year, and it is very common for the consultant haematologist on-call to be contacted for advice in just this scenario. The Trust does not accept that the risks of anticoagulation are ‘poorly understood’, which was evidence provided to the coroner during the hearing. One of the Trust’s Consultant Haematologists confirms that in her experience clinicians are very aware of the risks of anticoagulation together with the risks of inappropriately stopping these agents. In other words, it was probable that the evidence regarding a ‘poor understanding’ was related to the risk benefit balance which is what can make such decisions difficult. There is good understanding of the risks in the case of a bleeding anticoagulated patient and clear understanding of where to obtain expert advice.”

Source location

Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 5 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026