PFD report

Laura Hill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Jan 2014•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to carry out falls risk assessments during hospital admission and transfer
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Present the case and lessons learned to ward managers at a Surgical Sisters’ meeting for dissemination to their teams.

    Stated by Stockport NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 February 2014.
  2. Action

    Formally counsel the nurses responsible for failing to follow falls-risk assessment and care-planning policy.

    Stated by Stockport NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 February 2014.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to carry out falls risk assessments during hospital admission and transfer

Wider context from the report

“Despite training being in existence in relation to the carrying out of Falls Risk Assessments there was a missed opportunity throughout the time Mrs Hill was in hospital for this to be carried out. There was no assessment on her admission to Ward C3 nor when she was transferred to Ward B6. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Present the case and lessons learned to ward managers at a Surgical Sisters’ meeting for dissemination to their teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This case has been presented by the managers of both wards involved to a wider audience of ward managers at a Surgical Sisters’ meeting on 17th March 2014, so that they may disseminate the lessons learned to their respective teams.”

Source location

2014-0064-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Foundation-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 17 February 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Formally counsel the nurses responsible for failing to follow falls-risk assessment and care-planning policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a result of our investigations, in the case of the falls risk assessment undertaken on ward C3, the nurse failed to follow Trust Policy in applying the falls risk wrist-band and in completing the falls risk care plan; had she done so this would have alerted other staff to the fact that the patient was at a higher risk of falls. The nurse concerned has been formally counselled on her failure to follow Trust Policy.”

Source location

2014-0064-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Foundation-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 17 February 2014

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Instigate an escalation process for locating unavailable equipment through senior nurses and the hospital site manager, with Datix monitoring to assess further equipment needs.

    Stated by Stockport NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 February 2014.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Instigate an escalation process for locating unavailable equipment through senior nurses and the hospital site manager, with Datix monitoring to assess further equipment needs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Actions We have instigated an escalation process whereby, if any equipment cannot be located within the immediate ward environment, staff must contact the senior nurses on ‘professional cover’ for the Business Groups by bleep in the first instance to assist in locating the equipment. Should the bleep-holder be unable to resolve the problem, this is to be escalated to the hospital site manager who will either locate the equipment or assist in the re-assessment of those currently in use across the hospital. This will be monitored via the Datix incident reporting system to ascertain the need for further equipment to be purchased.”

Source location

2014-0064-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Foundation-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 17 February 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026