PFD report

Mr Adrian Ashford · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 Feb 2020•Inner South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of a systematic process for recording weights
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably monitor patients' weightsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable recording and availability of patient weight, height and BMI information
  2. Failure to identify risks of gastrointestinal bleeding and reasons for urgent transfer
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding
  3. Failure to consider gastroenterology referral after clinical deterioration
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably refer patients to required specialist services
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Change the consultant’s clinical practice in response to learning from the case.

    Stated by Lewisham and Greenwich NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 March 2020.
  2. Action

    Operate a systematic weekly weight assessment process after admission, with weights and heights visible to Trust staff.

    Stated by Lewisham and Greenwich NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 March 2020.
  3. Action

    Implement a trust-wide electronic patient record enabling staff to record and view patient weights electronically.

    Stated by Lewisham and Greenwich NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 March 2020.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a systematic process for recording weights

Wider context from the report

“1. ████████ GP and ████████ Divisional Medical Director, both gave evidence of the value of having some system for regular weighing, and that it might save lives. This would enable reported weight loss to be verified and quantified and highlight triggers for investigation in a timely manner. But there appears to be no systematic process of recording weights. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably monitor patients' weights; Unreliable recording and availability of patient weight, height and BMI information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to identify risks of gastrointestinal bleeding and reasons for urgent transfer

Wider context from the report

“2. The consultant in acute medicine, who was on call when Mr Ashford was admitted to A&E on 11th December 2018 by psychiatrists, concerned about the risk of GI bleeding, diagnosed constipation and returned him to a psychiatric bed. It appears he failed to identify the risks of GI bleed identified in A&E on 11th, nor the reasons for concern for urgent transfer (dehydration and drop in haemoglobin from 126 to 102g/l). On 14th he also failed to consider referral to a gastro-enterologist, after his blood pressure fell to 83/59 with a tachycardia of 112. He told the court “he was not thinking GI bleed”. Asked about learning from this death, he said that there was no change in his practice, other than increased awareness. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider gastroenterology referral after clinical deterioration

Wider context from the report

“2. The consultant in acute medicine, who was on call when Mr Ashford was admitted to A&E on 11th December 2018 by psychiatrists, concerned about the risk of GI bleeding, diagnosed constipation and returned him to a psychiatric bed. It appears he failed to identify the risks of GI bleed identified in A&E on 11th, nor the reasons for concern for urgent transfer (dehydration and drop in haemoglobin from 126 to 102g/l). On 14th he also failed to consider referral to a gastro-enterologist, after his blood pressure fell to 83/59 with a tachycardia of 112. He told the court “he was not thinking GI bleed”. Asked about learning from this death, he said that there was no change in his practice, other than increased awareness. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably refer patients to required specialist services.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Change the consultant’s clinical practice in response to learning from the case.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have met with the consultant involved and we have discussed this case fully. The consultant has conducted a complete case review and reflection that he will use in his annual appraisal. He has changed his own clinical practice and has also made his colleagues aware through a grand round to share the learning. A new standard operating procedure for managing suspected upper GI bleeding has been produced and circulated.”

Source location

2020-0054-Response-from-Lewisham-and-Greenwich-NHS-Trust.-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 18 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a systematic weekly weight assessment process after admission, with weights and heights visible to Trust staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“- The Trust also has a systematic process in place that covers weekly weights. On admission, there is a nursing task called safety assessment. The safety assessment is a set of assessments bundled into one task. One of the assessments within the safety assessment is the Nutritional Assessment, which includes patient weight/ height/ BMI. This task is then presented automatically on a weekly basis following admission. Weights and heights are then viewable in iView for all staff within the Trust”

Source location

2020-0054-Response-from-Lewisham-and-Greenwich-NHS-Trust.-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 18 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a trust-wide electronic patient record enabling staff to record and view patient weights electronically.

Verbatim wording from the response

“- The Trust has now implemented a trust-wide electronic patient record system (since May-June 2019). The system enables weight to be consistently recorded electronically which can then be observed by all staff within the Trust”

Source location

2020-0054-Response-from-Lewisham-and-Greenwich-NHS-Trust.-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 18 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Produce and circulate a standard operating procedure for managing suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have met with the consultant involved and we have discussed this case fully. The consultant has conducted a complete case review and reflection that he will use in his annual appraisal. He has changed his own clinical practice and has also made his colleagues aware through a grand round to share the learning. A new standard operating procedure for managing suspected upper GI bleeding has been produced and circulated.”

Source location

2020-0054-Response-from-Lewisham-and-Greenwich-NHS-Trust.-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 18 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide an electronic medicines-management order for recording patient weights at a specified frequency.

Verbatim wording from the response

“- Additionally, the electronic medicines management system has recently implemented a new way in which to get weights onto the system. There is now an order on the system that can be ordered to any desired frequency. This needs to be completed from the drug chart. Once completed in the drug chart the weights are viewable in iView as well.”

Source location

2020-0054-Response-from-Lewisham-and-Greenwich-NHS-Trust.-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 18 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share learning with colleagues through a grand round.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have met with the consultant involved and we have discussed this case fully. The consultant has conducted a complete case review and reflection that he will use in his annual appraisal. He has changed his own clinical practice and has also made his colleagues aware through a grand round to share the learning. A new standard operating procedure for managing suspected upper GI bleeding has been produced and circulated.”

Source location

2020-0054-Response-from-Lewisham-and-Greenwich-NHS-Trust.-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 18 March 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026