PFD report

Roy Burgess · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 21 Nov 2018•South Yorkshire (Eastern)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to adhere to the Early Warning System for identifying and escalating deteriorating patients
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deteriorationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical Early Warning Score systems for deteriorationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable escalation of abnormal clinical observations
  2. Failure to enter timed ward-round dictated notes in chronological order
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records
  3. Failure to record clinician input following escalation in clinical notes
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to adhere to the Early Warning System for identifying and escalating deteriorating patients

Wider context from the report

“(1) The hospital Early Warning System used to identify and escalate a deteriorating patient was not adhered to. This allowed missed opportunities for Mr Burgess’s care to receive Senior Medical reviews which could have altered his management. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration; Unreliable clinical Early Warning Score systems for deterioration; Unreliable escalation of abnormal clinical observations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to enter timed ward-round dictated notes in chronological order

Wider context from the report

“(3) Finally, untimed dictated notes of ward rounds, were then entered into the records in a non-chronological order, which was unhelpful and potentially misleading ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record clinician input following escalation in clinical notes

Wider context from the report

“(2) Inadequate record keeping by clinician within the Clinical notes. There were numerous examples of care having been escalated by nursing staff to doctors but no record of their input following this escalation was entered in the notes, e.g. on 4th December 2017, Mr Burgess’s care was escalated between 11:40 hours and 16:30 hours on at least 5 occasions and no entries were placed in his clinical records. This could have had a detrimental effect on his care and if this practice continues it will potentially affect other patients. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.