PFD report

Anthony Eric Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 1 Dec 2023•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Shortage of specialist scanning facilities causing delays in cancer diagnosis
  2. Delays in compliance with the two-week cancer pathway
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable two-week-wait cancer referral pathways
  3. Delays in accessing cancer treatment after diagnosis
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Support NHS trusts to increase diagnostic reporting capacity through additional reporting radiographers, radiologist trainees, international recruitment and workforce planning tools.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 6 December 2023.
  2. Action

    Consolidate cancer waiting-time requirements into the Faster Diagnosis, 62-day referral-to-treatment and 31-day decision-to-treat standards.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 December 2023.
  3. Action

    Develop a national network of diagnostic hubs and roll out at least 100 community diagnostic centres to expand testing capacity and reduce waiting times.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 6 December 2023.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Shortage of specialist scanning facilities causing delays in cancer diagnosis

Wider context from the report

“The inquest heard evidence that a national shortage of specialist scanning facilities such as was required in Mr Williams’ case meant that there were delays nationally with the diagnosis of cancers. This in turn led to delays in treatment and poorer outcomes for cancer patients as delays in diagnosis meant that the cancer would often have advanced further, and treatment was less likely to be successful. This was compounded by the fact that additional complications such as cord compression could arise whilst a scan was awaited and that the patient would be less able to cope with treatment such as chemotherapy when it ultimately started. The inquest also heard evidence that there were significant delays nationally in compliance with the two-week cancer pathway which led to poorer outcomes for patients as any delay in treatment reduced the likelihood of a successful outcome. Evidence was also heard that the delay Mr Williams faced between diagnosis and being seen for a plan to be developed was also part of a wider national picture of delay in accessing treatment and again reduced the chances of a successful treatment outcome. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in compliance with the two-week cancer pathway

Wider context from the report

“The inquest heard evidence that a national shortage of specialist scanning facilities such as was required in Mr Williams’ case meant that there were delays nationally with the diagnosis of cancers. This in turn led to delays in treatment and poorer outcomes for cancer patients as delays in diagnosis meant that the cancer would often have advanced further, and treatment was less likely to be successful. This was compounded by the fact that additional complications such as cord compression could arise whilst a scan was awaited and that the patient would be less able to cope with treatment such as chemotherapy when it ultimately started. The inquest also heard evidence that there were significant delays nationally in compliance with the two-week cancer pathway which led to poorer outcomes for patients as any delay in treatment reduced the likelihood of a successful outcome. Evidence was also heard that the delay Mr Williams faced between diagnosis and being seen for a plan to be developed was also part of a wider national picture of delay in accessing treatment and again reduced the chances of a successful treatment outcome. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable two-week-wait cancer referral pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in accessing cancer treatment after diagnosis

Wider context from the report

“The inquest heard evidence that a national shortage of specialist scanning facilities such as was required in Mr Williams’ case meant that there were delays nationally with the diagnosis of cancers. This in turn led to delays in treatment and poorer outcomes for cancer patients as delays in diagnosis meant that the cancer would often have advanced further, and treatment was less likely to be successful. This was compounded by the fact that additional complications such as cord compression could arise whilst a scan was awaited and that the patient would be less able to cope with treatment such as chemotherapy when it ultimately started. The inquest also heard evidence that there were significant delays nationally in compliance with the two-week cancer pathway which led to poorer outcomes for patients as any delay in treatment reduced the likelihood of a successful outcome. Evidence was also heard that the delay Mr Williams faced between diagnosis and being seen for a plan to be developed was also part of a wider national picture of delay in accessing treatment and again reduced the chances of a successful treatment outcome. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support NHS trusts to increase diagnostic reporting capacity through additional reporting radiographers, radiologist trainees, international recruitment and workforce planning tools.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The guidance includes caveats for sufficient availability of workforce as the numbers of reporting staff (radiologists and reporting radiographers) are not increasing in line with demand. We are supporting Trusts to increase reporting capacity by increasing the number of reporting radiographers and radiologist trainees per financial year, international recruitment initiatives and workforce demand and capacity planning tools.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 6 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consolidate cancer waiting-time requirements into the Faster Diagnosis, 62-day referral-to-treatment and 31-day decision-to-treat standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of the NHS reform of cancer standards, it was announced in August 2023 that cancer targets would be consolidated into three key standards:”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 6 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a national network of diagnostic hubs and roll out at least 100 community diagnostic centres to expand testing capacity and reduce waiting times.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In August 2022, NHS England published the Delivery plan for tackling the COVID-19 backlog of elective care. The plan sets out how NHS intends to recover elective care (which includes cancer pathways) over three years with one of the ambitions including ensuring that 95% of patients who need diagnostic tests receive them within six weeks of referral. To do this, we have committed to patients having three more convenient access to diagnostic procedures and tests, by developing a network of diagnostic hubs across England. The plan is supported by a government spend of £28 billion, and this includes £2.3 billion to help increase the volume of diagnostic activity and reduce patient waiting times through the roll out of at least 100 community diagnostic centres to help clear backlogs of people waiting for tests such as MRI, ultrasound and CT scans.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 6 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish imaging reporting turnaround-time guidance, including a three-day maximum for outpatient cancer-pathway PET-CT reporting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In August 2023, NHS England published the Image report turnaround time guidance available here: NHS England » Diagnostic imaging reporting turnaround times. The guidance sets out the maximum turnaround times for referral for a number of imaging services, including position emission tomography CT scans (PET CT). The turnaround times for PET CT scans for outpatient cancer pathway diagnosis is three days.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 6 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the NHS Long Term Workforce Plan through expanded healthcare staff training, retention and reform to improve service capacity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In June 2023, NHS England also published the NHS Long Term Workforce Plan, in response to the current lack of sufficient workforce. The plan sets out how we will train, retain and reform healthcare staff across the NHS over the next fifteen years, and is underpinned by the biggest recruitment drive in NHS history which will further improve service capacity and delivery.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 6 December 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Discuss all Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share resulting learning across national and regional NHS services.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 December 2023.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    The Trust found no requirement for further investigation into the patient’s diagnosis or subsequent intervention.

    Stated by NHS EnglandNo action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss all Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share resulting learning across national and regional NHS services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 6 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust found no requirement for further investigation into the patient’s diagnosis or subsequent intervention.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England has also engaged with Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board on some of the elements of Anthony’s care. We are advised that Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust have reviewed Anthony’s care and treatment and have found no requirement for further investigation into diagnosis or subsequent intervention. It is noted both by the Trust and by NHS England cancer specialists that Anthony’s cancer unfortunately took an unusually aggressive course.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 6 December 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026