PFD report

Susan EVANS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 13 Dec 2024•Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to ensure specialist bariatric team review of post-operative gastric bypass patients
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely medical review of admitted patientsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable post-operative monitoring and clinical reviewPart of recurring concern: Unreliable postoperative clinical review and complication response
  2. Failure of non-specialist medical staff to recognise the significance of post-operative pain
  3. Failure to escalate increased abdominal pain to a senior doctor within 2 hours
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior cliniciansPart of recurring concern: Failure to take timely escalation action when safety thresholds are breached
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Further disseminate the Bariatric Discharge Protocol at the Biannual AGM, nursing surgical study day and surgical ward-level safety huddles.

    Stated by Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 18 December 2024.
  2. Action

    Disseminate the Bariatric Discharge Protocol through surgical governance and team meetings and email it to surgical staff with bariatric out-of-hours or emergency responsibility.

    Stated by Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 December 2024.
  3. Action

    Implement a Bariatric Discharge Protocol in the pathway booklet requiring pre-discharge specialist review, pain-control assessment, discharge criteria and consultant discussion when criteria are unmet.

    Stated by Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 December 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure specialist bariatric team review of post-operative gastric bypass patients

Wider context from the report

“Queen Alexandra’s written post operative care pathway for patients who have undergone a gastric bypass operation states that: - There is to be a daily review by a bariatric specialist nurse, consultant or registrar. - A senior doctor is to review within 2 hours if there is increased abdominal pain in order to rule out anastomotic leak or bleed. In addition to this, the inquest heard evidence that patients should be seen by a member of the specialist bariatric team prior to discharge. This is not included in the written policy. Neither the written nor informal policy set out above were followed in Ms Evans’ case. She was not reviewed by a member of the specialist bariatric team at any point on day 2 after surgery and the pain she experienced from the early hours of 13 July 2023 was not escalated to a senior doctor at all. The inquest heard evidence that medical staff who were not part of the specialist bariatric team were unlikely to appreciate the significance of pain. The failure to follow policy contributed more than minimally to Ms Evans death and is therefore a matter of concern. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely medical review of admitted patients; Unreliable post-operative monitoring and clinical review; Unreliable postoperative clinical review and complication response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of non-specialist medical staff to recognise the significance of post-operative pain

Wider context from the report

“Queen Alexandra’s written post operative care pathway for patients who have undergone a gastric bypass operation states that: - There is to be a daily review by a bariatric specialist nurse, consultant or registrar. - A senior doctor is to review within 2 hours if there is increased abdominal pain in order to rule out anastomotic leak or bleed. In addition to this, the inquest heard evidence that patients should be seen by a member of the specialist bariatric team prior to discharge. This is not included in the written policy. Neither the written nor informal policy set out above were followed in Ms Evans’ case. She was not reviewed by a member of the specialist bariatric team at any point on day 2 after surgery and the pain she experienced from the early hours of 13 July 2023 was not escalated to a senior doctor at all. The inquest heard evidence that medical staff who were not part of the specialist bariatric team were unlikely to appreciate the significance of pain. The failure to follow policy contributed more than minimally to Ms Evans death and is therefore a matter of concern. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to escalate increased abdominal pain to a senior doctor within 2 hours

Wider context from the report

“Queen Alexandra’s written post operative care pathway for patients who have undergone a gastric bypass operation states that: - There is to be a daily review by a bariatric specialist nurse, consultant or registrar. - A senior doctor is to review within 2 hours if there is increased abdominal pain in order to rule out anastomotic leak or bleed. In addition to this, the inquest heard evidence that patients should be seen by a member of the specialist bariatric team prior to discharge. This is not included in the written policy. Neither the written nor informal policy set out above were followed in Ms Evans’ case. She was not reviewed by a member of the specialist bariatric team at any point on day 2 after surgery and the pain she experienced from the early hours of 13 July 2023 was not escalated to a senior doctor at all. The inquest heard evidence that medical staff who were not part of the specialist bariatric team were unlikely to appreciate the significance of pain. The failure to follow policy contributed more than minimally to Ms Evans death and is therefore a matter of concern. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior clinicians; Failure to take timely escalation action when safety thresholds are breached.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Further disseminate the Bariatric Discharge Protocol at the Biannual AGM, nursing surgical study day and surgical ward-level safety huddles.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The new protocol, (which includes safety netting advice, advising patients how to make contact if they become unwell following discharge) has been shared at the Surgical Clinical Governance meeting which is attended by surgical resident doctors and consultants. The protocol was also discussed in the Bariatric Team meeting and is going to be discussed again at the Biannual AGM on 7/3/2025.”

Source location

Response from Portsmouth Hospital NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 18 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate the Bariatric Discharge Protocol through surgical governance and team meetings and email it to surgical staff with bariatric out-of-hours or emergency responsibility.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The new protocol, (which includes safety netting advice, advising patients how to make contact if they become unwell following discharge) has been shared at the Surgical Clinical Governance meeting which is attended by surgical resident doctors and consultants. The protocol was also discussed in the Bariatric Team meeting and is going to be discussed again at the Biannual AGM on 7/3/2025.”

Source location

Response from Portsmouth Hospital NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 18 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a Bariatric Discharge Protocol in the pathway booklet requiring pre-discharge specialist review, pain-control assessment, discharge criteria and consultant discussion when criteria are unmet.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to the concerns set out above, there is already a policy in place which covers points 1 and 2. Unfortunately, on this occasion, it was sadly not followed. At least in part, because it was not clearly visible in the patient’s ward notes to act as a prompt. To counter this, the Bariatric lead surgeon has written a Bariatric Discharge Protocol (the new protocol) which has been incorporated into the bariatric pathway booklet which is completed for each patient undergoing bariatric surgery and kept in their medical notes for use by treating clinicians (doctors and nurses). This protocol requires a member of the bariatric team or suitable clinician to review the patient prior to discharge and ensure the patient’s pain is settling and controlled with suitable analgesia prior to discharge.”

Source location

Response from Portsmouth Hospital NHS Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 18 December 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026