PFD report

PAUL DAVID ANTHONY JAMES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 Apr 2018•Mid Kent and Medway

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to prevent access to razor blades
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of access to means of self-harm
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Consider options for managing disposable-razor risks, including further access controls and safer alternatives.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 25 September 2018.
  2. Action

    Issue a learning bulletin reinforcing razor-blade risks and providing guidance on managing access to disposable razors.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 September 2018.
  3. Action

    Pilot a revised ACCT case-management process with documentation prompting case managers to assess razor-blade risks and consider access restrictions during reviews.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 September 2018.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to prevent access to razor blades

Wider context from the report

“That Mr James was given access to razor blades in all the circumstances. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of access to means of self-harm.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider options for managing disposable-razor risks, including further access controls and safer alternatives.

Verbatim wording from the response

“and provides further guidance on how to manage them. Second, early in 2019 we will be piloting a revised version of the ACCT case management process for prisoners at risk of self-harm and suicide, and we will ensure that the revised documentation that is being introduced prompts case managers specifically to consider the risks associated with razor blades, and whether or not it is appropriate to take steps to restrict access, as part of each individual case review. Finally, the Prison Safety Team is giving further consideration to a broader range of options for managing this issue, including the practicality of further controls on access and the availability of safer alternatives to disposable razors.”

Source location

2018-0254-Response-by-HM-Prison-Probation-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 25 September 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue a learning bulletin reinforcing razor-blade risks and providing guidance on managing access to disposable razors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to your concerns, we are taking a number of further actions. First, we will be issuing a learning bulletin within the next few weeks that draws on the example of this case to re-emphasise the risk presented by access to razor blades”

Source location

2018-0254-Response-by-HM-Prison-Probation-Service
Page 1 · response
Published 25 September 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Pilot a revised ACCT case-management process with documentation prompting case managers to assess razor-blade risks and consider access restrictions during reviews.

Verbatim wording from the response

“and provides further guidance on how to manage them. Second, early in 2019 we will be piloting a revised version of the ACCT case management process for prisoners at risk of self-harm and suicide, and we will ensure that the revised documentation that is being introduced prompts case managers specifically to consider the risks associated with razor blades, and whether or not it is appropriate to take steps to restrict access, as part of each individual case review. Finally, the Prison Safety Team is giving further consideration to a broader range of options for managing this issue, including the practicality of further controls on access and the availability of safer alternatives to disposable razors.”

Source location

2018-0254-Response-by-HM-Prison-Probation-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 25 September 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026