PFD report

Brian Robert DORLING and Philippine Marthe Anne Marie de GERIN-RICARD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Oct 2013•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
25

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Insufficient education of cyclists and motorists about safer riding techniques
  2. Use of unbordered blue strips that confuse cyclists and motorists about cycle-lane status and positioning
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road markings for road-user safety
  3. Difficult-to-negotiate junction at Whitechapel High Street and Commercial Street
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.14

  1. Action

    Minimise unbordered blue surfacing near signalised junctions and on route links, using logo patches or advisory line markings where appropriate.

    Stated by Greater London AuthorityStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 October 2013.
  2. Action

    Develop an innovative junction layout, consult key stakeholders and conduct rigorous off-street safety testing.

    Stated by Greater London AuthorityStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 17 October 2013.
  3. Action

    Avoid applying unbordered blue surfacing at Bow Roundabout’s north-east and south-east slip roads pending further research.

    Stated by Greater London AuthorityStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 October 2013.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.5

  1. Position

    Further research is required before implementing new unbordered blue surfacing or retrospectively removing existing applications.

    Stated by Greater London AuthorityUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient education of cyclists and motorists about safer riding techniques

Wider context from the report

“2. It seems that, despite the efforts already made, more work could usefully be undertaken to educate cyclists (and motorists) about safer riding techniques. For example, it may seem counter intuitive to some cyclists to take the lane, in other words not always to ride over to the left of the lane, but sometimes more towards the middle. However, sometimes this is the safest option. And most especially, the dangers of a cycle overtaking vehicular traffic on the inside in the approach to a junction, cannot be over stressed. Public information advertising in cycle shops, on websites, or even on television, could assist in changing the culture in this respect. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use of unbordered blue strips that confuse cyclists and motorists about cycle-lane status and positioning

Wider context from the report

“1. Whilst the cycle super highways have been implemented with a range of measures that many cyclists have found helpful, the unbordered blue strips that have been painted on some roads are confusing. I heard evidence that many cyclists and motorists simply do not appreciate that such a blue strip without a white line border (whether unbroken or broken) is not a cycle lane. Whilst research has been carried out into the effect of the cycle super highways, no research has been carried out specifically into the effect of unbordered blue strips. The confusion has the following potential consequences. • Cyclists wrongly assume (as Mr Dorling may have done) that they have priority, and are lulled into a false sense of security. • Cyclists believe that they have to ride on the blue strips, which may not be the correct position for them to assume in particular circumstances, most particularly when going round a roundabout. • Motorists’ awareness of the possible presence of cyclists is raised, but they expect these cyclists to be on the blue strips, which the cyclists may not be if they are assuming the safest position, particularly when going round a roundabout. • When the strips are painted within a lane that is plainly not wide enough to accommodate vehicular and cycle traffic, motorists may form the incorrect view that they have to stay out of the strip and so straddle lanes, rather than simply overtaking a cyclist at the appropriate time. • Alternatively, motorists may drive over the blue strips, which they are perfectly entitled to do, but then get into the habit of driving over coloured strips, and not notice when these are actually bordered by white lines and so are cycle lanes. Thus, cyclists riding in cycle lanes elsewhere in London and the rest of the country, are put in greater danger. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road markings for road-user safety.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Difficult-to-negotiate junction at Whitechapel High Street and Commercial Street

Wider context from the report

“3. The junction of Whitechapel High Street and Commercial Street in London E1 (where Ms de Gerin-Ricard sustained her fatal injuries) remains difficult to negotiate. As I am sure you are aware, innovative solutions need to be considered, whether this be in terms of infrastructure or other. For example, I note that in York there is currently a trial of the Cycle Alert system, where an HGV can be fitted with a sensor that detects the presence of a cycle also so fitted, the cycle equipment being available for as little as £5. I do not say that this is the answer, I merely seek to illustrate the sort of thinking that may be helpful. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of research into the effects of unbordered blue strips

Wider context from the report

“1. Whilst the cycle super highways have been implemented with a range of measures that many cyclists have found helpful, the unbordered blue strips that have been painted on some roads are confusing. I heard evidence that many cyclists and motorists simply do not appreciate that such a blue strip without a white line border (whether unbroken or broken) is not a cycle lane. Whilst research has been carried out into the effect of the cycle super highways, no research has been carried out specifically into the effect of unbordered blue strips. The confusion has the following potential consequences. • Cyclists wrongly assume (as Mr Dorling may have done) that they have priority, and are lulled into a false sense of security. • Cyclists believe that they have to ride on the blue strips, which may not be the correct position for them to assume in particular circumstances, most particularly when going round a roundabout. • Motorists’ awareness of the possible presence of cyclists is raised, but they expect these cyclists to be on the blue strips, which the cyclists may not be if they are assuming the safest position, particularly when going round a roundabout. • When the strips are painted within a lane that is plainly not wide enough to accommodate vehicular and cycle traffic, motorists may form the incorrect view that they have to stay out of the strip and so straddle lanes, rather than simply overtaking a cyclist at the appropriate time. • Alternatively, motorists may drive over the blue strips, which they are perfectly entitled to do, but then get into the habit of driving over coloured strips, and not notice when these are actually bordered by white lines and so are cycle lanes. Thus, cyclists riding in cycle lanes elsewhere in London and the rest of the country, are put in greater danger. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Minimise unbordered blue surfacing near signalised junctions and on route links, using logo patches or advisory line markings where appropriate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Unbordered blue surface on the approach to and exit from signalised junctions”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 2 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop an innovative junction layout, consult key stakeholders and conduct rigorous off-street safety testing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“TfL anticipates announcing plans for an innovative layout for consultation in early 2014. In the meantime, TfL is working with key stakeholders on these designs which will also be used at other junctions. In view of the innovative nature of the design, TfL will also oversee rigorous off street testing to ensure that the design meets safety requirements.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 6 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Avoid applying unbordered blue surfacing at Bow Roundabout’s north-east and south-east slip roads pending further research.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Unbordered blue surface across the entry and exit slip roads at Bow Roundabout”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 3 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Replace unbordered blue surfacing at signal-controlled junctions with logo patches, retaining blue patches where junctions contain yellow boxes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the meantime, where unbordered blue surface was to be used across signal controlled junctions, it will be replaced by appropriately sized and placed ‘logo patches’ which will comprise a square patch of blue colour with a cycle and the Cycle Superhighway route number logo marked in white on top. Where a junction contains a yellow box, the white logo markings will not be used, but the blue patches will be retained. This will retain some of the demonstrated benefits of the blue surface strips, but will not provide any opportunity to be mistaken as any form of continuous cycle lane marking.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 2 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install full segregation and cycle-separated junctions on Whitechapel High Street as part of the Cycle Superhighway 2 upgrade.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Junction of Whitechapel High Street and Commercial Street”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 6 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Trial cycle-separated junctions and cyclist-specific traffic lights through Transport Research Laboratory safety research before on-street implementation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The cycle-separated junctions, which are proposed to be used at all the busy junctions on the route, are the first in Britain. They are planned to be trialled as part of TfL’s cycle safety research being undertaken at the Transport Research Laboratory before being implemented on street. They will include segregated approaches and special cycle-specific traffic lights with a cyclist phase to guard against conflict with turning motor traffic.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 6 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commission, manage, review and act on research into coloured cycle-route surfacing and road-user interaction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As was included in the evidence from ████████ TfL had commissioned research into the use of unbordered blue surfacing on the Cycle Superhighways. Further research into the use of coloured carriageway surfacing on cycle routes (and in particular Cycle Superhighways) and the interaction of road users with regards to that colour. That research will be commissioned, managed, reviewed and acted upon by TfL. TfL anticipate that it will take six months to conclude and we will let you know the findings of this work once complete.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 1 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Replace existing blue surfacing at Bow Roundabout’s north-west and south-west slip roads with blue logo patches.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Unbordered blue surface across the entry and exit slip roads at Bow Roundabout”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 3 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue using advisory cycle lanes with dashed white lines through signal-controlled junctions on Cycle Superhighway 2.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Blue colour through signal controlled junctions”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 3 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Minimise unbordered blue surfacing at priority junctions and use blue surfacing with dashed white lane markings wherever possible.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Unbordered blue surface at priority junctions”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 2 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Design the Aldgate-to-Bow Cycle Superhighway 2 upgrade, including improved junctions and segregation measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The new section of Cycle Superhighway 2, between Bow and Stratford, has just under 2 miles of new cycle lanes physically separated from traffic, along with “bus stop bypasses” to protect cyclists. Two more substantially-segregated cycle routes will be built through the heart of central London with a north-south route from Elephant and Castle to the London Borough of Islington complementing the east-west route previously announced in my Cycling Vision.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 6 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Suspend new applications of unbordered blue surfacing through signal-controlled junctions pending risk assessment and further research.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is evidence provided through existing research, commissioned by TfL, that there are safety benefits from the use of unbordered blue surface through signalised junctions. However there is currently no evidence to address the observational claims of a ‘false sense of security’ for cyclists. Such use of unbordered blue therefore becomes a balance between an established benefit and a potential risk.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 2 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider changes to current and planned Cycle Superhighway designs after the further surfacing research concludes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Pending the completion of this further research TfL will consider what actions, if any, should be taken with regards to the current design of Cycle Superhighway extensions and upgrades as well as on new Cycle Superhighway routes.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 1 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate and fund cycle and HGV safety education, training, advertising campaigns and cyclist-driver awareness events.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You poignantly pointed out at the inquest into the death of Philippine De Gerin-Ricard that she had no awareness of the danger she had put herself in. And as you acknowledged at the inquest into the death of Brian Dorling, both Mr Dorling and the HGV driver had gone through a red light. I remain absolutely committed to providing education and training for road users in the Capital. Alongside substantial investment in improving infrastructure and funding the MPS Task Force, TfL also organises and funds an extensive programme of safety training and marketing campaigns, aimed at both drivers and cyclists. Details of this are outlined below.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 3 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Further research is required before implementing new unbordered blue surfacing or retrospectively removing existing applications.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Until the potential risk can be properly assessed through further research, no new applications of unbordered blue surface through signal controlled junctions will be implemented. Unbordered blue surface may be adopted and applied again in the future if a net safety benefit is concluded as a result of consideration and further research.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 2 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The existence of cyclist and road-user confusion from unbordered blue surfacing is neither substantiated nor negated by existing research.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The acknowledgement in your report that the current use of unbordered blue surfacing may have consequences in terms of the perceptions and behaviours of cyclists and other road users is noted. You refer to the fact that possible confusion (the existence of which is neither substantiated nor negated by any existing research) has “potential” consequences, without stating definitively that these consequences arise, or have arisen, in practice.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 1 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Blue surfacing will be retained in bus lanes because mandatory markings and bus-lane enforcement provide cyclists with formally protected space.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A 1.5m wide blue surface will be retained in bus lanes as the enforcement of the bus lane itself (at the minimum operating during peak usage times for cars commuting cyclists, and sometimes for longer) provides a formally protected space for cyclists, with a mandatory line at the edge of the bus lane.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 2 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unbordered blue surfacing will be retained at limited locations where lane width prevents formal cycle-lane markings and traffic conflict is not expected.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In a limited number of circumstances, where there is insufficient lane width to formally mark an advisory or mandatory cycle lane, the unbordered blue will be retained where there is no potential conflict with left turning vehicles and there is considered to be benefits to cyclists as there is sufficient room for most motorised traffic to avoid overrunning the blue surface.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 2 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

TfL is responsible for commissioning, managing, reviewing and acting on further research into coloured cycle-route surfacing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As was included in the evidence from ████████ TfL had commissioned research into the use of unbordered blue surfacing on the Cycle Superhighways. Further research into the use of coloured carriageway surfacing on cycle routes (and in particular Cycle Superhighways) and the interaction of road users with regards to that colour. That research will be commissioned, managed, reviewed and acted upon by TfL. TfL anticipate that it will take six months to conclude and we will let you know the findings of this work once complete.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 1 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.11

  1. 1

    Operate the Industrial HGV Task Force to inspect vehicles and take enforcement action against unsafe operators and vehicles.

    Stated by Greater London AuthorityStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 October 2013.
  2. 2

    Work with industry, manufacturers and enforcement bodies to improve construction-vehicle safety, retrofit equipment and establish common work-related road-risk standards.

    Stated by Greater London AuthorityStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 17 October 2013.
  3. 3

    Require contractors and subcontractors through TfL contracts to fit specified vehicle safety equipment beyond minimum legal requirements.

    Stated by Greater London AuthorityStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 October 2013.
  4. 4

    Install similar cycle-separated junctions at other network locations and deliver further junction, segregation and semi-segregation improvements.

    Stated by Greater London AuthorityStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 October 2013.
  5. 5

    Upgrade existing Cycle Superhighway routes, complete new routes to segregated standards and build two substantially segregated central-London routes.

    Stated by Greater London AuthorityStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 October 2013.
  6. 6

    Launch a consultation on a Safer Lorry Scheme requiring basic safety equipment on HGVs operating in London.

    Stated by Greater London AuthorityStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 October 2013.
  7. 7

    Refrain from retrospective removal of other existing unbordered blue surfacing applications pending further research and risk assessment.

    Stated by Greater London AuthorityStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 October 2013.
  8. 8

    Trial a high-visibility construction lorry and work with industry to identify and promote similarly designed vehicles.

    Stated by Greater London AuthorityStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 October 2013.
  9. 9

    Engage vehicle manufacturers and the EU to improve lorry-cab visibility of cyclists and vehicle safety design.

    Stated by Greater London AuthorityStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 17 October 2013.
  10. 10

    Complete technical reviews of cycle-detection systems and invite participants to further trials.

    Stated by Greater London AuthorityStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 17 October 2013.
  11. 11

    Update Delivery and Servicing Plans and Construction Logistics Plans, and encourage their inclusion in relevant planning applications and construction plans.

    Stated by Greater London AuthorityStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 October 2013.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate the Industrial HGV Task Force to inspect vehicles and take enforcement action against unsafe operators and vehicles.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am committed to taking action against bad operators and unsafe vehicles through the recently created Industrial HGV Task Force. Since the task force was launched in September 2013, more than 800 vehicles have been stopped and checked, with less than a quarter being satisfactory. Over 250 Fixed Penalty Notices have been issued so far for a variety of offences including mobile phone use, insurance and driving licences offences and unsecured loads, with 14 vehicles seized for being unfit to operate on the UK’s roads.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 5 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with industry, manufacturers and enforcement bodies to improve construction-vehicle safety, retrofit equipment and establish common work-related road-risk standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“More than half of the cyclists sadly killed or seriously injured in London over recent years were involved in a collision with a goods vehicle and a high proportion of these collisions are with construction vehicles. Although the construction industry has made great strides in reducing serious incidents and fatalities within construction sites, it sadly remains the case that too many construction-related vehicles are involved in fatal collisions involving cyclists in London. TfL has been working closely with the construction logistics industry, vehicle manufacturers and enforcement and regulatory bodies since the beginning of 2013 to tackle this issue and create a step-change in the way work-related road safety is managed within the construction industry.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 4 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require contractors and subcontractors through TfL contracts to fit specified vehicle safety equipment beyond minimum legal requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“TfL also have standard provisions in all contracts requiring its contractors to fit specified safety equipment to certain types of vehicles and to ensure that their subcontractors also comply with these obligations which are in excess of current minimum legal requirements.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 5 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install similar cycle-separated junctions at other network locations and deliver further junction, segregation and semi-segregation improvements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Similar junctions will also be installed at other locations on the network as part of future work. Not all existing Cycle Superhighways are capable of full segregation, but there will be a number of further improvements using a combination of better junctions, segregation, semi-segregation and other measures to reduce exposure to road risk.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 7 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Upgrade existing Cycle Superhighway routes, complete new routes to segregated standards and build two substantially segregated central-London routes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“First, I would like to express my sincere condolences to the family and friends of Brian Dorling and Philippine de Gerin-Ricard. Every death on London’s roads is one too many and I, together with TfL, will continue to do everything we can to reduce the risk to all users, and we are redoubling our efforts to improve safety for cyclists. This is why I am spending almost £1bn to provide for cycling, including two fully segregated highways through the heart of central London, remodelling dozens of the most dangerous junctions and a network of back street ‘Quietway’ routes. In my cycling vision, published earlier this year, I also committed to upgrading all existing superhighway routes, introducing full or semi-segregated cycle lanes where possible and committed to complete all new Cycle Superhighways to the same standard.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 1 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Launch a consultation on a Safer Lorry Scheme requiring basic safety equipment on HGVs operating in London.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the New Year, I will launch a consultation on a Safer Lorry Scheme to ensure HGV vehicles driving in London meet basic safety requirements, such as ensuring that side bars and blind spot safety mirrors are fitted.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 5 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Refrain from retrospective removal of other existing unbordered blue surfacing applications pending further research and risk assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Retrospective changes”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 3 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Trial a high-visibility construction lorry and work with industry to identify and promote similarly designed vehicles.

Verbatim wording from the response

“TfL have also announced that it will be trialling a new construction lorry with vastly improved driver visibility and safety equipment. The Laing O’Rourke vehicle, which will be used to transport commercial waste away from the Crossrail project, has a cab with larger front and side windows, significantly reducing the blind spot compared to similar vehicles. TfL will also be working with the industry to identify other models of vehicles with similar high-visibility cabs to help the construction industry further adopt them into their fleet and press manufacturers to adopt these designs for vehicles.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 5 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage vehicle manufacturers and the EU to improve lorry-cab visibility of cyclists and vehicle safety design.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This shows a cyclist just how little the driver can see from the driver's seat. However, TfL is also looking at long-term solutions and is working with the EU and the motor industry to design vehicles that give drivers good visibility without relying on technology.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 4 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete technical reviews of cycle-detection systems and invite participants to further trials.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Thank you for illustrating the example of the York cycle alert system. TfL continues to pursue innovative cycle detection solutions, although full recognition of cyclists is important that every cyclist is detected and not just those fitted with tags. Therefore, TfL is currently carrying out further technical reviews of available systems and once these are completed, will invite participants to further trials.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 6 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update Delivery and Servicing Plans and Construction Logistics Plans, and encourage their inclusion in relevant planning applications and construction plans.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Reducing both freight journeys at the busiest times and the number of larger vehicles reduces the risk of collisions with other road users, especially cyclists and pedestrians. By encouraging better compliance and higher safety levels TfL can also reduce the risk of collisions involving goods vehicles. This work also includes updating TfL’s Delivery and Servicing Plans/Construction Logistics Plans, which encourage best practice in all types of freight vehicle movement to and from buildings and construction sites. Alongside TfL’s work with the construction industry TfL will be working to encourage developers and boroughs to include them in all relevant planning applications and construction plans.”

Source location

2013-0265-Response-by-Mayor-of-London
Page 5 · response
Published 17 October 2013

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026