PFD report

Kuldeep Singh Dhillon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Oct 2013•East London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Insufficient enforcement and auditing of road-goods loading and transport requirements
  2. Lack of restraint for palletised loads during loading, unloading and road transport
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably secure loads on road vehiclesPart of recurring concern: Unsafe loading and unloading of heavy vehicle loads
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient enforcement and auditing of road-goods loading and transport requirements

Wider context from the report

“5. Evidence was given at the inquest that it is the Department of Transport that is responsible for enforcing and auditing compliance with the pieces of legislation (supported by specific guidance and codes of practice) that govern the loading and transport of goods by road in the UK. 6. Evidence was given that there, clearly, is insufficient enforcing and auditing of the guidance and codes of practice. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of restraint for palletised loads during loading, unloading and road transport

Wider context from the report

“1. Evidence was given at the inquest that the load which the deceased was carrying was sitting on the vehicle’s load bed without any restraint at all. 2. This, according to the evidence given, was ‘common practice nationwide with palletised loads’. You note that this evidence was given by a senior engineer from the Engineering Safety Unit of the Health and Safety Laboratory. 3. This type of lack of restraint not only puts a driver at risk whilst driving but also at risk during loading and unloading. 4. Evidence was given at the inquest by the senior engineer that similar evidence has been given be her at inquests nationwide over a number of years without any apparent change in industry practice. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably secure loads on road vehicles; Unsafe loading and unloading of heavy vehicle loads.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.