PFD report

Mone Jahni Karl White · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 21 Jan 2014•North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to ensure that advice about clinical care for patients with special clinical requirements reaches all treating clinicians
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Implement and document a specialist-care flagging system, supported by a standard operating procedure and communicated across the Paediatric Directorate and Governance meeting.

    Stated by London North West University Healthcare NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 January 2014.
  2. Action

    Improve the functionality of the implemented specialist-care flagging system.

    Stated by London North West University Healthcare NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 January 2014.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Developing a specialist-patient flag system is a local matter; the NHS Trust must ensure relevant information is routinely accessed and acted upon.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure that advice about clinical care for patients with special clinical requirements reaches all treating clinicians

Wider context from the report

“(1) The development of a flag system for patients, under the care of specialist hospitals, with special clinical requirements to ensure that advice about clinical care is brought to the attention of all treating clinicians. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement and document a specialist-care flagging system, supported by a standard operating procedure and communicated across the Paediatric Directorate and Governance meeting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Further to the receipt of the above, I am able to confirm that The North West London Hospitals NHS Trust (NWLHT) has developed a flagging system for patients under the care of specialist hospitals with specialist clinical requirements. This will ensure the advice about the clinical care of these children is brought to the attention of all treating clinicians.”

Source location

2014-0031Response-2
Page 1 · response
Published 21 January 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Improve the functionality of the implemented specialist-care flagging system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am able to confirm that the flagging system has been implemented and further work is underway to improve its functionality.”

Source location

2014-0031Response-2
Page 1 · response
Published 21 January 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Developing a specialist-patient flag system is a local matter; the NHS Trust must ensure relevant information is routinely accessed and acted upon.

Verbatim wording from the response

“With regard to developing a flag system in specialist hospitals to ensure that advice about clinical care is brought to the attention of all treating clinicians, I consider that”

Source location

2014-0031-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 21 January 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026