PFD report

Chad George ALLFORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Oct 2024•Derby and Derbyshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of police officer awareness of the risks and safety principles of manually removing drugs from a person's mouth
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable police safety response to suspected drug swallowing by detainees
  2. Failure to communicate the life-threatening risks of retaining concealed drugs in the mouth
  3. Lack of standard guidance or training for police officers responding to concealment of drugs in the mouth
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable police safety response to suspected drug swallowing by detainees
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Add guidance on communicating the life-threatening risks of swallowing drugs to future Personal Safety Manual and curriculum versions.

    Stated by College of PolicingStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 November 2024.
  2. Action

    Revise the Personal Safety Manual, including guidance on drugs or other articles concealed in the mouth and associated risks.

    Stated by College of PolicingStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 1 November 2024.
  3. Action

    Mandate delivery of at least one mouth-concealment scenario during initial and refresher safety training.

    Stated by Derbyshire ConstabularyStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 November 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing training curricula allow relevant guidance and risk mitigation where local needs analysis identifies drug concealment as a risk.

    Stated by College of PolicingExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of police officer awareness of the risks and safety principles of manually removing drugs from a person's mouth

Wider context from the report

“The evidence in this inquest focused, in part, on police officers’ response to concealment of drugs in the mouth. The officers were part of a team, acting on intelligence, to make a drug offence arrest. None of the officers concerned had received prior training in this regard. They employed various methods to try and control Mr Allford and although each instructed Mr Allford to spit the drugs out, none of them warned him of the risks to his life of not doing so. It was not clear that officers understood the importance of communicating the dangers. Attempts were made by officers to open his mouth and sweep the drugs out of the mouth with their hands. A number of officers gave evidence that they were not aware of some of the risks inherent in placing their hands in someone’s mouth, including the risk of packages entering the airway and therefore choking, and they were not aware of the relevant passages in the NPCC Personal Safety Manual or importantly, the principles relating to this contained within. This was not only the position in 2021 but remained the position at the time of the inquest. I am concerned that there is no standard provision for guidance or training for police officers in units tasked to make arrests for drug offences, to equip them to make informed decisions when faced with this situation. In the Personal Safety Manual ( Module 12 pg 42), it is described as a 'common tactic used by some subjects during arrest to conceal controlled drugs in their mouths'. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable police safety response to suspected drug swallowing by detainees.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to communicate the life-threatening risks of retaining concealed drugs in the mouth

Wider context from the report

“The evidence in this inquest focused, in part, on police officers’ response to concealment of drugs in the mouth. The officers were part of a team, acting on intelligence, to make a drug offence arrest. None of the officers concerned had received prior training in this regard. They employed various methods to try and control Mr Allford and although each instructed Mr Allford to spit the drugs out, none of them warned him of the risks to his life of not doing so. It was not clear that officers understood the importance of communicating the dangers. Attempts were made by officers to open his mouth and sweep the drugs out of the mouth with their hands. A number of officers gave evidence that they were not aware of some of the risks inherent in placing their hands in someone’s mouth, including the risk of packages entering the airway and therefore choking, and they were not aware of the relevant passages in the NPCC Personal Safety Manual or importantly, the principles relating to this contained within. This was not only the position in 2021 but remained the position at the time of the inquest. I am concerned that there is no standard provision for guidance or training for police officers in units tasked to make arrests for drug offences, to equip them to make informed decisions when faced with this situation. In the Personal Safety Manual ( Module 12 pg 42), it is described as a 'common tactic used by some subjects during arrest to conceal controlled drugs in their mouths'. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of standard guidance or training for police officers responding to concealment of drugs in the mouth

Wider context from the report

“The evidence in this inquest focused, in part, on police officers’ response to concealment of drugs in the mouth. The officers were part of a team, acting on intelligence, to make a drug offence arrest. None of the officers concerned had received prior training in this regard. They employed various methods to try and control Mr Allford and although each instructed Mr Allford to spit the drugs out, none of them warned him of the risks to his life of not doing so. It was not clear that officers understood the importance of communicating the dangers. Attempts were made by officers to open his mouth and sweep the drugs out of the mouth with their hands. A number of officers gave evidence that they were not aware of some of the risks inherent in placing their hands in someone’s mouth, including the risk of packages entering the airway and therefore choking, and they were not aware of the relevant passages in the NPCC Personal Safety Manual or importantly, the principles relating to this contained within. This was not only the position in 2021 but remained the position at the time of the inquest. I am concerned that there is no standard provision for guidance or training for police officers in units tasked to make arrests for drug offences, to equip them to make informed decisions when faced with this situation. In the Personal Safety Manual ( Module 12 pg 42), it is described as a 'common tactic used by some subjects during arrest to conceal controlled drugs in their mouths'. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable police safety response to suspected drug swallowing by detainees.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add guidance on communicating the life-threatening risks of swallowing drugs to future Personal Safety Manual and curriculum versions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since the time of Mr Allford's death the College of Policing has instigated a review of the current version of the Personal Safety Manual, as a result of this review it is currently being revised, which is a detailed and lengthy process. Part of this process includes an examination on the guidance for dealing with articles in the mouth. The current manual does not feature guidance on informing a subject regarding the risk to their life as a result of swallowing drugs, future versions of the manual and curriculum will do so. In the interim period while the manual is”

Source location

Response from College of Policing
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise the Personal Safety Manual, including guidance on drugs or other articles concealed in the mouth and associated risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since the time of Mr Allford's death the College of Policing has instigated a review of the current version of the Personal Safety Manual, as a result of this review it is currently being revised, which is a detailed and lengthy process. Part of this process includes an examination on the guidance for dealing with articles in the mouth. The current manual does not feature guidance on informing a subject regarding the risk to their life as a result of swallowing drugs, future versions of the manual and curriculum will do so. In the interim period while the manual is”

Source location

Response from College of Policing
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Mandate delivery of at least one mouth-concealment scenario during initial and refresher safety training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. It has been mandated that during both initial and refresher safety training, at least one scenario covering the concealment of an item in the mouth must be delivered.”

Source location

Response from Derbyshire Constabulary
Page 2 · response
Published 1 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Design and implement a lesson plan covering concealment of items in a subject’s mouth for Derbyshire Constabulary training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. A lesson plan has been designed and implemented to cover the necessary points pertaining to concealment of an item in a subject’s mouth for training within Derbyshire Constabulary.”

Source location

Response from Derbyshire Constabulary
Page 2 · response
Published 1 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing training curricula allow relevant guidance and risk mitigation where local needs analysis identifies drug concealment as a risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The issue of drugs being concealed in a subjects mouth may not be as widespread as the wording in the manual implies. Anecdotal evidence suggests it is ordinarily linked with a small number of subjects who practice the tactic frequently. In force areas where concealment of drugs in the mouth is an identified risk, training curriculums developed by the College of Policing allow for the provision of the relevant sections of the Personal Safety Manual to be delivered. This facility is available in both the historic Personal Safety Training and the latest Public &”

Source location

Response from College of Policing
Page 2 · response
Published 1 November 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Send national communication through the NPCC Self Defence Arrest & Restraint Panel advising forces of the recommendation.

    Stated by College of PolicingStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 November 2024.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Drug concealment in the mouth may not be as widespread as the manual’s wording implies.

    Stated by College of PolicingDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Send national communication through the NPCC Self Defence Arrest & Restraint Panel advising forces of the recommendation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“completed communication will be sent out nationally via the NPCC Self Defence Arrest & Restraint Panel to advise forces of this recommendation and implement appropriate changes.”

Source location

Response from College of Policing
Page 2 · response
Published 1 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Drug concealment in the mouth may not be as widespread as the manual’s wording implies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The issue of drugs being concealed in a subjects mouth may not be as widespread as the wording in the manual implies. Anecdotal evidence suggests it is ordinarily linked with a small number of subjects who practice the tactic frequently. In force areas where concealment of drugs in the mouth is an identified risk, training curriculums developed by the College of Policing allow for the provision of the relevant sections of the Personal Safety Manual to be delivered. This facility is available in both the historic Personal Safety Training and the latest Public &”

Source location

Response from College of Policing
Page 2 · response
Published 1 November 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026