PFD report

Andrew Nathan Paul Kenward · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Jul 2025•Surrey

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Lack of restrictions on import of reportable substances
  2. Failure to consider whether sale purity and quantities are necessary for legitimate use
  3. Lack of domestic restrictions on purchase of reportable substances
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate controls on the sale and online access to highly toxic substances
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Assess the feasibility of additional regulatory and non-regulatory controls for the substance.

    Stated by Home OfficeStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 July 2025.
  2. Action

    Engage online platforms and retailers to promote responsible sales and voluntary removal of pure-form sales to the public.

    Stated by Home OfficeStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 July 2025.
  3. Action

    Issue Border Force officers guidance on control actions for suspected suicide-related goods at the border.

    Stated by Home OfficeStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 July 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    Border Force’s control actions for overseas acquisitions are limited to existing legal provisions.

    Stated by Home OfficeUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of restrictions on import of reportable substances

Wider context from the report

“A lethal dose of ████████ can be as small as 1g. Mr Kenward was able to procure a total of 1kg of ████████ at 99.999% purity. Coroners including myself have previously raised in Prevention of Future Death reports that there is no central monitoring system which is able to record incidents of sodium nitrite poisoning, although the use of sodium nitrite for self-harm is increasing. ████████ and ████████ are reportable substances under the Poisons Act 1972. The only obligation under this legislation is that domestic sellers must report reasonable grounds for believing transactions are suspicious. Whilst the source of this particular ████████ is not currently known, there are no restrictions on the import of ████████ or ████████ from abroad. Whilst these substances have legitimate uses, including meat preservation, there does not appear to have been consideration as to whether the purity can be diluted, or any other measures taken, to reduce the risk posed by the quantities in which these substances are currently sold, against the risk to life that they can pose. - ████████ can be purchased domestically with no restrictions save a duty on sellers to report suspicious transactions; - ████████ can be purchased from abroad and imported to Great Britain with no restrictions; - ████████ is sold at levels of purity (99%) and in quantities which represent significant risk to life (up to 1000 fatal doses for 1kg sale), whether by self-harm or terrorist use; - The quantities and purity in which ████████ are sold do not appear to be those required for their legitimate use, for example in meat preservation; - It does not appear there is any consideration of regulating/monitoring the use of ████████ outside the limited provisions of the Poisons Act 1972, and it is not clear which Government department would be responsible for this. Consideration should be given as to whether any steps can be taken to address the above concerns. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider whether sale purity and quantities are necessary for legitimate use

Wider context from the report

“A lethal dose of ████████ can be as small as 1g. Mr Kenward was able to procure a total of 1kg of ████████ at 99.999% purity. Coroners including myself have previously raised in Prevention of Future Death reports that there is no central monitoring system which is able to record incidents of sodium nitrite poisoning, although the use of sodium nitrite for self-harm is increasing. ████████ and ████████ are reportable substances under the Poisons Act 1972. The only obligation under this legislation is that domestic sellers must report reasonable grounds for believing transactions are suspicious. Whilst the source of this particular ████████ is not currently known, there are no restrictions on the import of ████████ or ████████ from abroad. Whilst these substances have legitimate uses, including meat preservation, there does not appear to have been consideration as to whether the purity can be diluted, or any other measures taken, to reduce the risk posed by the quantities in which these substances are currently sold, against the risk to life that they can pose. - ████████ can be purchased domestically with no restrictions save a duty on sellers to report suspicious transactions; - ████████ can be purchased from abroad and imported to Great Britain with no restrictions; - ████████ is sold at levels of purity (99%) and in quantities which represent significant risk to life (up to 1000 fatal doses for 1kg sale), whether by self-harm or terrorist use; - The quantities and purity in which ████████ are sold do not appear to be those required for their legitimate use, for example in meat preservation; - It does not appear there is any consideration of regulating/monitoring the use of ████████ outside the limited provisions of the Poisons Act 1972, and it is not clear which Government department would be responsible for this. Consideration should be given as to whether any steps can be taken to address the above concerns. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of domestic restrictions on purchase of reportable substances

Wider context from the report

“A lethal dose of ████████ can be as small as 1g. Mr Kenward was able to procure a total of 1kg of ████████ at 99.999% purity. Coroners including myself have previously raised in Prevention of Future Death reports that there is no central monitoring system which is able to record incidents of sodium nitrite poisoning, although the use of sodium nitrite for self-harm is increasing. ████████ and ████████ are reportable substances under the Poisons Act 1972. The only obligation under this legislation is that domestic sellers must report reasonable grounds for believing transactions are suspicious. Whilst the source of this particular ████████ is not currently known, there are no restrictions on the import of ████████ or ████████ from abroad. Whilst these substances have legitimate uses, including meat preservation, there does not appear to have been consideration as to whether the purity can be diluted, or any other measures taken, to reduce the risk posed by the quantities in which these substances are currently sold, against the risk to life that they can pose. - ████████ can be purchased domestically with no restrictions save a duty on sellers to report suspicious transactions; - ████████ can be purchased from abroad and imported to Great Britain with no restrictions; - ████████ is sold at levels of purity (99%) and in quantities which represent significant risk to life (up to 1000 fatal doses for 1kg sale), whether by self-harm or terrorist use; - The quantities and purity in which ████████ are sold do not appear to be those required for their legitimate use, for example in meat preservation; - It does not appear there is any consideration of regulating/monitoring the use of ████████ outside the limited provisions of the Poisons Act 1972, and it is not clear which Government department would be responsible for this. Consideration should be given as to whether any steps can be taken to address the above concerns. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls on the sale and online access to highly toxic substances.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of regulation and monitoring of substance use beyond the Poisons Act

Wider context from the report

“A lethal dose of ████████ can be as small as 1g. Mr Kenward was able to procure a total of 1kg of ████████ at 99.999% purity. Coroners including myself have previously raised in Prevention of Future Death reports that there is no central monitoring system which is able to record incidents of sodium nitrite poisoning, although the use of sodium nitrite for self-harm is increasing. ████████ and ████████ are reportable substances under the Poisons Act 1972. The only obligation under this legislation is that domestic sellers must report reasonable grounds for believing transactions are suspicious. Whilst the source of this particular ████████ is not currently known, there are no restrictions on the import of ████████ or ████████ from abroad. Whilst these substances have legitimate uses, including meat preservation, there does not appear to have been consideration as to whether the purity can be diluted, or any other measures taken, to reduce the risk posed by the quantities in which these substances are currently sold, against the risk to life that they can pose. - ████████ can be purchased domestically with no restrictions save a duty on sellers to report suspicious transactions; - ████████ can be purchased from abroad and imported to Great Britain with no restrictions; - ████████ is sold at levels of purity (99%) and in quantities which represent significant risk to life (up to 1000 fatal doses for 1kg sale), whether by self-harm or terrorist use; - The quantities and purity in which ████████ are sold do not appear to be those required for their legitimate use, for example in meat preservation; - It does not appear there is any consideration of regulating/monitoring the use of ████████ outside the limited provisions of the Poisons Act 1972, and it is not clear which Government department would be responsible for this. Consideration should be given as to whether any steps can be taken to address the above concerns. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of central monitoring of sodium nitrite poisoning incidents

Wider context from the report

“A lethal dose of ████████ can be as small as 1g. Mr Kenward was able to procure a total of 1kg of ████████ at 99.999% purity. Coroners including myself have previously raised in Prevention of Future Death reports that there is no central monitoring system which is able to record incidents of sodium nitrite poisoning, although the use of sodium nitrite for self-harm is increasing. ████████ and ████████ are reportable substances under the Poisons Act 1972. The only obligation under this legislation is that domestic sellers must report reasonable grounds for believing transactions are suspicious. Whilst the source of this particular ████████ is not currently known, there are no restrictions on the import of ████████ or ████████ from abroad. Whilst these substances have legitimate uses, including meat preservation, there does not appear to have been consideration as to whether the purity can be diluted, or any other measures taken, to reduce the risk posed by the quantities in which these substances are currently sold, against the risk to life that they can pose. - ████████ can be purchased domestically with no restrictions save a duty on sellers to report suspicious transactions; - ████████ can be purchased from abroad and imported to Great Britain with no restrictions; - ████████ is sold at levels of purity (99%) and in quantities which represent significant risk to life (up to 1000 fatal doses for 1kg sale), whether by self-harm or terrorist use; - The quantities and purity in which ████████ are sold do not appear to be those required for their legitimate use, for example in meat preservation; - It does not appear there is any consideration of regulating/monitoring the use of ████████ outside the limited provisions of the Poisons Act 1972, and it is not clear which Government department would be responsible for this. Consideration should be given as to whether any steps can be taken to address the above concerns. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for sodium nitrite poisoning risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Sale of reportable substances at lethal purity and quantities

Wider context from the report

“A lethal dose of ████████ can be as small as 1g. Mr Kenward was able to procure a total of 1kg of ████████ at 99.999% purity. Coroners including myself have previously raised in Prevention of Future Death reports that there is no central monitoring system which is able to record incidents of sodium nitrite poisoning, although the use of sodium nitrite for self-harm is increasing. ████████ and ████████ are reportable substances under the Poisons Act 1972. The only obligation under this legislation is that domestic sellers must report reasonable grounds for believing transactions are suspicious. Whilst the source of this particular ████████ is not currently known, there are no restrictions on the import of ████████ or ████████ from abroad. Whilst these substances have legitimate uses, including meat preservation, there does not appear to have been consideration as to whether the purity can be diluted, or any other measures taken, to reduce the risk posed by the quantities in which these substances are currently sold, against the risk to life that they can pose. - ████████ can be purchased domestically with no restrictions save a duty on sellers to report suspicious transactions; - ████████ can be purchased from abroad and imported to Great Britain with no restrictions; - ████████ is sold at levels of purity (99%) and in quantities which represent significant risk to life (up to 1000 fatal doses for 1kg sale), whether by self-harm or terrorist use; - The quantities and purity in which ████████ are sold do not appear to be those required for their legitimate use, for example in meat preservation; - It does not appear there is any consideration of regulating/monitoring the use of ████████ outside the limited provisions of the Poisons Act 1972, and it is not clear which Government department would be responsible for this. Consideration should be given as to whether any steps can be taken to address the above concerns. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls on the sale and online access to highly toxic substances.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess the feasibility of additional regulatory and non-regulatory controls for the substance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“includes targeted action on emerging methods of suicide. In recent months, my officials have been working with the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and other departments to assess the feasibility of additional regulatory and non-regulatory levers for the substance in question. A cross-government workshop took place in June to explore these options. Further meetings will shortly be held between senior officials to agree recommendations for a coordinated government response.”

Source location

2025-0346 Response from Home Office
Page 2 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage online platforms and retailers to promote responsible sales and voluntary removal of pure-form sales to the public.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the meantime, the Home Office continues to engage with industry to promote responsible sales practices. My officials have engaged with selected online platforms and retailers individually to encourage them to voluntarily remove the sale of these substances to members of the public in their pure form, and be vigilant for the possibility of purchase for self-harm or suicide. For all substances within scope of the Poisons Act, the Homeland Security Group works to improve retailer awareness of their legal obligation to report suspicious activity and to inform retailers sales practices. For example, we encourage suppliers to use declaration of use forms for sales of potentially harmful substances. This work will continue to ensure suppliers are meeting their obligations under the Poisons Act.”

Source location

2025-0346 Response from Home Office
Page 2 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue Border Force officers guidance on control actions for suspected suicide-related goods at the border.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Moreover, to target potentially harmful acquisitions of this substance from overseas merchants, last year Border Force issued guidance to its officers about the control actions they must take, within existing legal provisions, if they receive any form of information suggesting that goods at the border contain items intended to assist with suicide. This relies on Border Force working closely with police forces and other relevant agencies to safeguard vulnerable individuals to the full extent possible. This work is complex, and Border Force will continue to monitor its policies, exploring opportunities to improve its ability to act where possible and to ensure that frontline Border Force staff who may encounter these items know what action to take and are supported on a case-by-case basis when required.”

Source location

2025-0346 Response from Home Office
Page 2 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor Border Force policies, explore improvements to intervention capability, and support frontline staff encountering these items.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Moreover, to target potentially harmful acquisitions of this substance from overseas merchants, last year Border Force issued guidance to its officers about the control actions they must take, within existing legal provisions, if they receive any form of information suggesting that goods at the border contain items intended to assist with suicide. This relies on Border Force working closely with police forces and other relevant agencies to safeguard vulnerable individuals to the full extent possible. This work is complex, and Border Force will continue to monitor its policies, exploring opportunities to improve its ability to act where possible and to ensure that frontline Border Force staff who may encounter these items know what action to take and are supported on a case-by-case basis when required.”

Source location

2025-0346 Response from Home Office
Page 2 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Border Force’s control actions for overseas acquisitions are limited to existing legal provisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Moreover, to target potentially harmful acquisitions of this substance from overseas merchants, last year Border Force issued guidance to its officers about the control actions they must take, within existing legal provisions, if they receive any form of information suggesting that goods at the border contain items intended to assist with suicide. This relies on Border Force working closely with police forces and other relevant agencies to safeguard vulnerable individuals to the full extent possible. This work is complex, and Border Force will continue to monitor its policies, exploring opportunities to improve its ability to act where possible and to ensure that frontline Border Force staff who may encounter these items know what action to take and are supported on a case-by-case basis when required.”

Source location

2025-0346 Response from Home Office
Page 2 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Poisons Act reporting obligation does not apply to sellers based overseas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The substance in question is currently classified as a reportable substance under the Poisons Act 1972. While this requires GB-based sellers to report suspicious transactions, we acknowledge that this obligation does not apply to sellers based overseas. My officials are currently carrying out research into the availability of the substance in question, both domestically and internationally.”

Source location

2025-0346 Response from Home Office
Page 1 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for concerns about access to large amounts of sodium nitrite sits with another organisation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The report raises concerns over the fact that Mr Kenward was able to buy large amounts of sodium nitrite. Officials within the Department of Health and Social Care have considered these concerns and concluded that the responsibility for these concerns sits within another organisation. I understand that this report was also made to the Home Office, and I hope that their response will be helpful.”

Source location

Response from Department for Health and Social Care
Page 1 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Hold senior-official meetings to agree recommendations for a coordinated government response.

    Stated by Home OfficeStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 July 2025.
  2. 2

    Improve retailer awareness of suspicious-activity reporting obligations and responsible sales practices, including use of declaration-of-use forms.

    Stated by Home OfficeStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 July 2025.
  3. 3

    Research the domestic and international availability of the substance.

    Stated by Home OfficeStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 July 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hold senior-official meetings to agree recommendations for a coordinated government response.

Verbatim wording from the response

“includes targeted action on emerging methods of suicide. In recent months, my officials have been working with the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and other departments to assess the feasibility of additional regulatory and non-regulatory levers for the substance in question. A cross-government workshop took place in June to explore these options. Further meetings will shortly be held between senior officials to agree recommendations for a coordinated government response.”

Source location

2025-0346 Response from Home Office
Page 2 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Improve retailer awareness of suspicious-activity reporting obligations and responsible sales practices, including use of declaration-of-use forms.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the meantime, the Home Office continues to engage with industry to promote responsible sales practices. My officials have engaged with selected online platforms and retailers individually to encourage them to voluntarily remove the sale of these substances to members of the public in their pure form, and be vigilant for the possibility of purchase for self-harm or suicide. For all substances within scope of the Poisons Act, the Homeland Security Group works to improve retailer awareness of their legal obligation to report suspicious activity and to inform retailers sales practices. For example, we encourage suppliers to use declaration of use forms for sales of potentially harmful substances. This work will continue to ensure suppliers are meeting their obligations under the Poisons Act.”

Source location

2025-0346 Response from Home Office
Page 2 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Research the domestic and international availability of the substance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The substance in question is currently classified as a reportable substance under the Poisons Act 1972. While this requires GB-based sellers to report suspicious transactions, we acknowledge that this obligation does not apply to sellers based overseas. My officials are currently carrying out research into the availability of the substance in question, both domestically and internationally.”

Source location

2025-0346 Response from Home Office
Page 1 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026