PFD report

Josephine Foday and Komba Kpakiwa · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 23 May 2014•Essex

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
8

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised8

  1. Failure to ensure trained aquatic rescue staff are present when the pool is open
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate controls for drowning risks in swimming pools
  2. Inherently dangerous pool profile
  3. Unclear, inaccurate and ambiguous pool signage
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure trained aquatic rescue staff are present when the pool is open

Wider context from the report

“8) The pool operators did not ensure that in a pool of over 1.5m depth there were always on the premises, when the pool was open, staff trained in aquatic rescue techniques. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for drowning risks in swimming pools.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inherently dangerous pool profile

Wider context from the report

“1) The pool profile was inherently dangerous ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unclear, inaccurate and ambiguous pool signage

Wider context from the report

“7) Some of the signage provided was not clear, accurate and unambiguous. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to obtain swimming pool expert advice on controls for unsupervised pool use

Wider context from the report

“6) The pool operators had not sought the advice of a swimming pool expert in order to decide what would constitute adequate controls where constant pool supervision was not provided in this unusual hopper type pool. The operators were relying on CCTV as a method of supervision but this was not monitored and no system was put in its place when it became unavailable. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for drowning risks in swimming pools.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide lifeguards or effective drowning-risk controls

Wider context from the report

“4) There were no lifeguards provided and the duty holders of the pool did not ensure that there were in place effective controls in place to reduce the risk of drowning ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable lifeguard provision for aquatic safety.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider non-swimmers and poor swimmers in risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“5) It did not appear that non swimmers or poor swimmers had been considered in the risk assessment process. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable objective criteria for safety risk assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to assess the pool profile and specific risk factors

Wider context from the report

“2) The pool profile, including depths and gradients were not considered when carrying out the hazard identification that is required in the swimming pool guidance document HSG 179 3) The risk assessments did not cover the accurate profile information and any other specific risk factors ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to assess underlying process risks independently of existing controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to monitor CCTV supervision and provide a contingency when unavailable

Wider context from the report

“6) The pool operators had not sought the advice of a swimming pool expert in order to decide what would constitute adequate controls where constant pool supervision was not provided in this unusual hopper type pool. The operators were relying on CCTV as a method of supervision but this was not monitored and no system was put in its place when it became unavailable. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable safety CCTV monitoring systems.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026