PFD report

Victoria Cartwright · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Jun 2022•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure of collaborative working across organisations during hospital discharge
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processes
  2. Failure to include relevant community care organisations in multidisciplinary discharge planning
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processes
  3. Failure to ensure discharge accommodation is suitable for complex medical needs
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of collaborative working across organisations during hospital discharge

Wider context from the report

“████████ Consultant Psychiatrist for Greater Manchester Mental Health Trust stated he had recommended a 24 hour care placement for Victoria to meet her clinical needs. Despite this, she was discharged from hospital to the Mercure Hotel, used to house homeless individuals. ████████ stated that this hotel would have been unsuitable for Victoria’s medical needs and following her readmission back to hospital, raised similar concerns. He also stated that he was never notified of Victoria’s actual discharges. ████████ a Recovery Co-Ordinator, employed by We Are With You (formerly Achieve) stated he was never invited to Victoria’s MDT meeting and it would have been beneficial for his organisation to have been taken part in this meeting. He concurred that the Mercure Hotel would have been unsuitable accommodation to suit Victoria’s complex needs and was not involved in the hospital discharge processes. Evidence highlights a lack of collaborative working between the discharge team, Wigan Hospital, GMMH and Achieve. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to include relevant community care organisations in multidisciplinary discharge planning

Wider context from the report

“████████ Consultant Psychiatrist for Greater Manchester Mental Health Trust stated he had recommended a 24 hour care placement for Victoria to meet her clinical needs. Despite this, she was discharged from hospital to the Mercure Hotel, used to house homeless individuals. ████████ stated that this hotel would have been unsuitable for Victoria’s medical needs and following her readmission back to hospital, raised similar concerns. He also stated that he was never notified of Victoria’s actual discharges. ████████ a Recovery Co-Ordinator, employed by We Are With You (formerly Achieve) stated he was never invited to Victoria’s MDT meeting and it would have been beneficial for his organisation to have been taken part in this meeting. He concurred that the Mercure Hotel would have been unsuitable accommodation to suit Victoria’s complex needs and was not involved in the hospital discharge processes. Evidence highlights a lack of collaborative working between the discharge team, Wigan Hospital, GMMH and Achieve. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure discharge accommodation is suitable for complex medical needs

Wider context from the report

“████████ Consultant Psychiatrist for Greater Manchester Mental Health Trust stated he had recommended a 24 hour care placement for Victoria to meet her clinical needs. Despite this, she was discharged from hospital to the Mercure Hotel, used to house homeless individuals. ████████ stated that this hotel would have been unsuitable for Victoria’s medical needs and following her readmission back to hospital, raised similar concerns. He also stated that he was never notified of Victoria’s actual discharges. ████████ a Recovery Co-Ordinator, employed by We Are With You (formerly Achieve) stated he was never invited to Victoria’s MDT meeting and it would have been beneficial for his organisation to have been taken part in this meeting. He concurred that the Mercure Hotel would have been unsuitable accommodation to suit Victoria’s complex needs and was not involved in the hospital discharge processes. Evidence highlights a lack of collaborative working between the discharge team, Wigan Hospital, GMMH and Achieve. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to notify relevant clinical professionals of patient discharges

Wider context from the report

“████████ Consultant Psychiatrist for Greater Manchester Mental Health Trust stated he had recommended a 24 hour care placement for Victoria to meet her clinical needs. Despite this, she was discharged from hospital to the Mercure Hotel, used to house homeless individuals. ████████ stated that this hotel would have been unsuitable for Victoria’s medical needs and following her readmission back to hospital, raised similar concerns. He also stated that he was never notified of Victoria’s actual discharges. ████████ a Recovery Co-Ordinator, employed by We Are With You (formerly Achieve) stated he was never invited to Victoria’s MDT meeting and it would have been beneficial for his organisation to have been taken part in this meeting. He concurred that the Mercure Hotel would have been unsuitable accommodation to suit Victoria’s complex needs and was not involved in the hospital discharge processes. Evidence highlights a lack of collaborative working between the discharge team, Wigan Hospital, GMMH and Achieve. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.