PFD report

Mollie Bentham · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Dec 2015•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
11

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure to record family concerns, clinical attendances and observed symptoms in patient notes
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to maintain a shared clinical overview of patients' changing concernsPart of recurring concern: Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records
  2. Failure to document attendance, actions, assigned responsibility and timescales in Multi-Disciplinary Team Meeting notes
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably implement multidisciplinary team recommendationsPart of recurring concern: Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records
  3. Failure to conduct effective shift handovers between nursing and medical staff
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable shift handover processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.10

  1. Action

    Increase consultant attendance sessions at Darley Court Intermediate Care beyond the existing two sessions per week.

    Stated by The TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 December 2015.
  2. Action

    Review handover efficiency at shift changes and incorporate identified improvements into the handover procedures.

    Stated by The TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 December 2015.
  3. Action

    Disseminate record-keeping guidance and escalation guidance, and remind staff to document and escalate patient concerns appropriately.

    Stated by The TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 December 2015.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record family concerns, clinical attendances and observed symptoms in patient notes

Wider context from the report

“1. During the Inquest evidence was heard that i. The notes at Darley Court Intermediate Care Centre did not refer to the family concerns expressed to the nursing staff from the 23rd April 2015 onwards and the notes did not include a note from the out of hours General Practitioner, who attended Darley Court on the 26th April 2015, nor the attendance of ████████ on the 27th April 2015. The notes did not make any reference to abdominal pain suffered by Miss Bentham until the 28th April 2015, even though the family expressed concerns with regard to abdominal pain on the 23rd April 2015. ii. There was no evidence of liaison between the nursing staff and the medical staff at Darley Court Intermediate Care Centre, particularly in relation to the concerns expressed by the family and with regard to the attendance of the out of hours General Practitioner on the 26th April 2015. iii. There was no evidence of handovers at shift changes as between nursing staff and medical staff particularly in relation to the concerns expressed by the family and the attendance of the out of hours General Practitioner on the 26th April 2015. iv. The notes of the Multi-Disciplinary Team Meetings, including the Meeting on the 27th April 2015, did not give details of who was present at the Meeting, the actions to be taken following the Meeting together with the person who was given responsibility to take the actions and a timescale in relation to the actions. The above concerns are particularly relevant in relation to a patient, like Miss Bentham, who was unable to communicate with either nursing staff or medical staff. In such circumstances and in the absence of documented and noted information in relation to family concerns a condition suffered by the patient may be left untreated without consideration by a reviewing doctor or a Multi-Disciplinary Team Meeting. v. The above issues raise training issues in relation to staff, both nursing and medical, at Darley Court Intermediate Care Centre. vi. The evidence raised concerns that there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken to review the above issues, particularly where known symptoms observed by the family are not brought to the attention of the reviewing medical team and no investigations are conducted with regard to the observed symptoms. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to maintain a shared clinical overview of patients' changing concerns; Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to document attendance, actions, assigned responsibility and timescales in Multi-Disciplinary Team Meeting notes

Wider context from the report

“1. During the Inquest evidence was heard that i. The notes at Darley Court Intermediate Care Centre did not refer to the family concerns expressed to the nursing staff from the 23rd April 2015 onwards and the notes did not include a note from the out of hours General Practitioner, who attended Darley Court on the 26th April 2015, nor the attendance of ████████ on the 27th April 2015. The notes did not make any reference to abdominal pain suffered by Miss Bentham until the 28th April 2015, even though the family expressed concerns with regard to abdominal pain on the 23rd April 2015. ii. There was no evidence of liaison between the nursing staff and the medical staff at Darley Court Intermediate Care Centre, particularly in relation to the concerns expressed by the family and with regard to the attendance of the out of hours General Practitioner on the 26th April 2015. iii. There was no evidence of handovers at shift changes as between nursing staff and medical staff particularly in relation to the concerns expressed by the family and the attendance of the out of hours General Practitioner on the 26th April 2015. iv. The notes of the Multi-Disciplinary Team Meetings, including the Meeting on the 27th April 2015, did not give details of who was present at the Meeting, the actions to be taken following the Meeting together with the person who was given responsibility to take the actions and a timescale in relation to the actions. The above concerns are particularly relevant in relation to a patient, like Miss Bentham, who was unable to communicate with either nursing staff or medical staff. In such circumstances and in the absence of documented and noted information in relation to family concerns a condition suffered by the patient may be left untreated without consideration by a reviewing doctor or a Multi-Disciplinary Team Meeting. v. The above issues raise training issues in relation to staff, both nursing and medical, at Darley Court Intermediate Care Centre. vi. The evidence raised concerns that there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken to review the above issues, particularly where known symptoms observed by the family are not brought to the attention of the reviewing medical team and no investigations are conducted with regard to the observed symptoms. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably implement multidisciplinary team recommendations; Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to conduct effective shift handovers between nursing and medical staff

Wider context from the report

“1. During the Inquest evidence was heard that i. The notes at Darley Court Intermediate Care Centre did not refer to the family concerns expressed to the nursing staff from the 23rd April 2015 onwards and the notes did not include a note from the out of hours General Practitioner, who attended Darley Court on the 26th April 2015, nor the attendance of ████████ on the 27th April 2015. The notes did not make any reference to abdominal pain suffered by Miss Bentham until the 28th April 2015, even though the family expressed concerns with regard to abdominal pain on the 23rd April 2015. ii. There was no evidence of liaison between the nursing staff and the medical staff at Darley Court Intermediate Care Centre, particularly in relation to the concerns expressed by the family and with regard to the attendance of the out of hours General Practitioner on the 26th April 2015. iii. There was no evidence of handovers at shift changes as between nursing staff and medical staff particularly in relation to the concerns expressed by the family and the attendance of the out of hours General Practitioner on the 26th April 2015. iv. The notes of the Multi-Disciplinary Team Meetings, including the Meeting on the 27th April 2015, did not give details of who was present at the Meeting, the actions to be taken following the Meeting together with the person who was given responsibility to take the actions and a timescale in relation to the actions. The above concerns are particularly relevant in relation to a patient, like Miss Bentham, who was unable to communicate with either nursing staff or medical staff. In such circumstances and in the absence of documented and noted information in relation to family concerns a condition suffered by the patient may be left untreated without consideration by a reviewing doctor or a Multi-Disciplinary Team Meeting. v. The above issues raise training issues in relation to staff, both nursing and medical, at Darley Court Intermediate Care Centre. vi. The evidence raised concerns that there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken to review the above issues, particularly where known symptoms observed by the family are not brought to the attention of the reviewing medical team and no investigations are conducted with regard to the observed symptoms. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable shift handover processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate training of nursing and medical staff in the above information-management processes

Wider context from the report

“1. During the Inquest evidence was heard that i. The notes at Darley Court Intermediate Care Centre did not refer to the family concerns expressed to the nursing staff from the 23rd April 2015 onwards and the notes did not include a note from the out of hours General Practitioner, who attended Darley Court on the 26th April 2015, nor the attendance of ████████ on the 27th April 2015. The notes did not make any reference to abdominal pain suffered by Miss Bentham until the 28th April 2015, even though the family expressed concerns with regard to abdominal pain on the 23rd April 2015. ii. There was no evidence of liaison between the nursing staff and the medical staff at Darley Court Intermediate Care Centre, particularly in relation to the concerns expressed by the family and with regard to the attendance of the out of hours General Practitioner on the 26th April 2015. iii. There was no evidence of handovers at shift changes as between nursing staff and medical staff particularly in relation to the concerns expressed by the family and the attendance of the out of hours General Practitioner on the 26th April 2015. iv. The notes of the Multi-Disciplinary Team Meetings, including the Meeting on the 27th April 2015, did not give details of who was present at the Meeting, the actions to be taken following the Meeting together with the person who was given responsibility to take the actions and a timescale in relation to the actions. The above concerns are particularly relevant in relation to a patient, like Miss Bentham, who was unable to communicate with either nursing staff or medical staff. In such circumstances and in the absence of documented and noted information in relation to family concerns a condition suffered by the patient may be left untreated without consideration by a reviewing doctor or a Multi-Disciplinary Team Meeting. v. The above issues raise training issues in relation to staff, both nursing and medical, at Darley Court Intermediate Care Centre. vi. The evidence raised concerns that there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken to review the above issues, particularly where known symptoms observed by the family are not brought to the attention of the reviewing medical team and no investigations are conducted with regard to the observed symptoms. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to maintain a shared clinical overview of patients' changing concerns; Inadequate staff training for clinical and care record keeping.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of nursing and medical staff to liaise about patient concerns and clinical attendances

Wider context from the report

“1. During the Inquest evidence was heard that i. The notes at Darley Court Intermediate Care Centre did not refer to the family concerns expressed to the nursing staff from the 23rd April 2015 onwards and the notes did not include a note from the out of hours General Practitioner, who attended Darley Court on the 26th April 2015, nor the attendance of ████████ on the 27th April 2015. The notes did not make any reference to abdominal pain suffered by Miss Bentham until the 28th April 2015, even though the family expressed concerns with regard to abdominal pain on the 23rd April 2015. ii. There was no evidence of liaison between the nursing staff and the medical staff at Darley Court Intermediate Care Centre, particularly in relation to the concerns expressed by the family and with regard to the attendance of the out of hours General Practitioner on the 26th April 2015. iii. There was no evidence of handovers at shift changes as between nursing staff and medical staff particularly in relation to the concerns expressed by the family and the attendance of the out of hours General Practitioner on the 26th April 2015. iv. The notes of the Multi-Disciplinary Team Meetings, including the Meeting on the 27th April 2015, did not give details of who was present at the Meeting, the actions to be taken following the Meeting together with the person who was given responsibility to take the actions and a timescale in relation to the actions. The above concerns are particularly relevant in relation to a patient, like Miss Bentham, who was unable to communicate with either nursing staff or medical staff. In such circumstances and in the absence of documented and noted information in relation to family concerns a condition suffered by the patient may be left untreated without consideration by a reviewing doctor or a Multi-Disciplinary Team Meeting. v. The above issues raise training issues in relation to staff, both nursing and medical, at Darley Court Intermediate Care Centre. vi. The evidence raised concerns that there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken to review the above issues, particularly where known symptoms observed by the family are not brought to the attention of the reviewing medical team and no investigations are conducted with regard to the observed symptoms. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to maintain a shared clinical overview of patients' changing concerns; Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increase consultant attendance sessions at Darley Court Intermediate Care beyond the existing two sessions per week.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust recently recruited a permanent doctor to Darley Court Intermediate Care (IMC) on a full time basis and this doctor is now in post. Prior to the commencement of ████████ the medical cover had been provided by locum doctors on long term contracts. I believe this permanent arrangement will enhance communication between the medical and nursing teams and provide continuity of care for patients. The level of consultant cover has also been reviewed and it is planned to increase the number of sessions a consultant will attend Darley Court IMC from the current provision of two sessions per week.”

Source location

Mollie-Bentham-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 30 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review handover efficiency at shift changes and incorporate identified improvements into the handover procedures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) have been developed with regard to improving the handover of information. The Daily Safety Huddle which takes place every morning now includes the doctor and a senior member of the therapy team. In addition, the senior Sister at Darley Court has been reviewing the efficiency of the handover process at the end of and commencement of a shift. Further improvements are identified these will be included in the SOP for handovers.”

Source location

Mollie-Bentham-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate record-keeping guidance and escalation guidance, and remind staff to document and escalate patient concerns appropriately.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Matron ████████ has reminded all staff that any concerns raised regarding a patient need to be clearly documented in the patient’s ongoing records and escalated where appropriate. A copy of the NMC guidelines has been circulated to all nursing staff highlighting the importance of accurate record keeping. Escalation guidance has also been produced to be read in conjunction with National Early Warning Score (NEWS) guidance.”

Source location

Mollie-Bentham-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop standard operating procedures for information handover.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) have been developed with regard to improving the handover of information. The Daily Safety Huddle which takes place every morning now includes the doctor and a senior member of the therapy team. In addition, the senior Sister at Darley Court has been reviewing the efficiency of the handover process at the end of and commencement of a shift. Further improvements are identified these will be included in the SOP for handovers.”

Source location

Mollie-Bentham-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review multidisciplinary team meetings and paperwork, and address poor documentation and failures to follow up meeting actions through a task-and-finish group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A review of the conduct of MDT meetings including evaluation of the paperwork used at the meetings has been lead by Ann Lloyd, Consultant Nurse for Older People. ████████ has set up a task and finish group and taken steps to address the issues of poor documentation and failure to follow up actions identified at MDT meetings. I am advised this work is still ongoing however its purpose will be to ensure there is improved clinical decision making from all disciplines attending the MDT with appropriate timescales set for actions to be taken and completed, ultimately this will facilitate the safe discharge of our patients. It is expected that this work will be complete by 31 March 2016.”

Source location

Mollie-Bentham-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide weekly and monthly documentation and record-keeping training for Darley Court staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Documentation training is also now included in the new weekly training programme, furthermore additional training is being provided on a monthly basis in respect of documentation and record keeping. Monthly documentation audits are now being undertaken to ensure compliance with this action and ensure the quality of record keeping is improved.”

Source location

Mollie-Bentham-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct monthly documentation audits to monitor compliance and improve record-keeping quality.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Documentation training is also now included in the new weekly training programme, furthermore additional training is being provided on a monthly basis in respect of documentation and record keeping. Monthly documentation audits are now being undertaken to ensure compliance with this action and ensure the quality of record keeping is improved.”

Source location

Mollie-Bentham-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recruit and place a permanent full-time doctor at Darley Court Intermediate Care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust recently recruited a permanent doctor to Darley Court Intermediate Care (IMC) on a full time basis and this doctor is now in post. Prior to the commencement of ████████ the medical cover had been provided by locum doctors on long term contracts. I believe this permanent arrangement will enhance communication between the medical and nursing teams and provide continuity of care for patients. The level of consultant cover has also been reviewed and it is planned to increase the number of sessions a consultant will attend Darley Court IMC from the current provision of two sessions per week.”

Source location

Mollie-Bentham-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 30 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include the doctor and a senior therapy-team member in the daily morning safety huddle.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) have been developed with regard to improving the handover of information. The Daily Safety Huddle which takes place every morning now includes the doctor and a senior member of the therapy team. In addition, the senior Sister at Darley Court has been reviewing the efficiency of the handover process at the end of and commencement of a shift. Further improvements are identified these will be included in the SOP for handovers.”

Source location

Mollie-Bentham-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide Darley Court staff direct access to an out-of-hours GP and require consultation details to be documented in Darley Court medical notes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Darley Court staff now have direct access to an Out of Hours (OOH) General Practitioner (GP) who is attached to the Admission Avoidance Team (AAT). The GP is with the AAT from 18:30 to 22:00 Monday to Friday and 9:00 to 22:00on Saturday and Sunday. Patients that require urgent medical attention outside of the hours of medical cover by the doctor at Darley Court but within the hours stipulated above will be seen by the OOH GP based at the AAT. It has been agreed with BARDOC (OOH GP Provider) that the GP will document details of the consultation in the medical notes at Darley Court. This will ensure that both the nursing and medical staff are informed of the treatment plan for the patient. I understand that this service has been utilised and positive feedback has been received from staff at Darley Court.”

Source location

Mollie-Bentham-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 30 December 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Introduce and update the SAFER care bundle for senior review, timely assessment, patient flow, early discharge and regular multidisciplinary review.

    Stated by The TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 December 2015.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce and update the SAFER care bundle for senior review, timely assessment, patient flow, early discharge and regular multidisciplinary review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since coming into post Matron ████████ has undertaken significant pieces of work to improve the standard of documentation and handover at Darley Court. This has included the adoption of the”

Source location

Mollie-Bentham-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 30 December 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026