PFD report

Dorothy Jennifer Nias · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Nov 2024•Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of medical fitness-to-drive assessment for drivers over 70
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably assess driver fitness and driving safety
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Analyse call-for-evidence research and evidence to assess whether further research or legislative changes are needed, including self-declaration.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 26 November 2024.
  2. Action

    Conducted a call for evidence on driver licensing for people with medical conditions.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 November 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    The Secretary of State for Transport will provide the substantive response on behalf of both interested persons.

    Stated by Driver and Vehicle Licensing AgencyRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of medical fitness-to-drive assessment for drivers over 70

Wider context from the report

“It was clear from the evidence that there were concerns raised by family members to Miss Nias regarding her ability to continue to drive having had a number of minor incidents prior to this collision. Despite encouragement to use alternative means of transport she was described as independent and chose to continue. The accident was caused by confusion between her brake and accelerator pedals in an automatic transmission vehicle, allowing her speed to increase without restriction and as a result she was unable to negotiate the roundabout leading to the collision. At present there is no upper age limit for drivers. Drivers over 70 are required to apply for a new licence every 3 years and there is no requirement for there to be any form of medical check or assessment to confirm fitness to drive. The applicant must make a self-declaration. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably assess driver fitness and driving safety.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Analyse call-for-evidence research and evidence to assess whether further research or legislative changes are needed, including self-declaration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In 2023, the DVLA carried out a call for evidence about driver licensing for people with medical conditions. The call for evidence sought views on the current legislative basis for assessing fitness to drive and what changes may be made. This was an important first step in gathering a wide range of views and evidence that may support future changes to the legal framework. The DVLA is considering the research and evidence provided and the need for any further research that may be required to inform potential changes to the legislative framework governing driver licensing for those with medical conditions. This will include the process of self-declaration. There are no plans for changes to the current driver licensing requirements while the analysis of the call for evidence responses continues.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 26 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conducted a call for evidence on driver licensing for people with medical conditions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In 2023, the DVLA carried out a call for evidence about driver licensing for people with medical conditions. The call for evidence sought views on the current legislative basis for assessing fitness to drive and what changes may be made. This was an important first step in gathering a wide range of views and evidence that may support future changes to the legal framework. The DVLA is considering the research and evidence provided and the need for any further research that may be required to inform potential changes to the legislative framework governing driver licensing for those with medical conditions. This will include the process of self-declaration. There are no plans for changes to the current driver licensing requirements while the analysis of the call for evidence responses continues.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 26 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Secretary of State for Transport will provide the substantive response on behalf of both interested persons.

Verbatim wording from the response

“My team has worked with Department of Transport colleagues on this matter and a full and substantive reply to your report, agreed on behalf of both Interested Persons, will be sent by the Secretary of State for Transport.”

Source location

Response from DVLA
Page 1 · response
Published 26 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No changes to driver licensing requirements are planned while the DVLA analyses call-for-evidence responses and determines whether further research is needed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In 2023, the DVLA carried out a call for evidence about driver licensing for people with medical conditions. The call for evidence sought views on the current legislative basis for assessing fitness to drive and what changes may be made. This was an important first step in gathering a wide range of views and evidence that may support future changes to the legal framework. The DVLA is considering the research and evidence provided and the need for any further research that may be required to inform potential changes to the legislative framework governing driver licensing for those with medical conditions. This will include the process of self-declaration. There are no plans for changes to the current driver licensing requirements while the analysis of the call for evidence responses continues.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 26 November 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026